they seem very easy photoshop to me. The reflections from below don't match the cameras, and also the way the camera's are stacked are WAY too flat. Just looking at the first image you can tell that the 3 camera's cannot be standing next to each other like that. They seem to be connected. I could do better 15 years ago with Photoshop 2.5. I would have gotten a "C" at most if I turned insomething like this for class.
In the A2000IS reflection IS the CANON logo is not even mirrored.
In the SX110is image, the reflection doesn't even show the front of the lens, that's some amazing light bending abilities.
I'm sorry, but whoever wrote this article needs to do a little more background check.
I'm waiting for the PowerShot G10. I don't have the budget for a dSLR, and would like a more professional camera.
The G9's image quality needs some improvement (canon increased the sensor size, but only tried to squeeze more pixels out of it), and it needs a wide-angle lens.
Okay, so the Photoshop work isn't perfect, but that doesn't mean they're fake. You're neglecting the camera mockups themselves, which appear to be quite legit!
You can buy a separate wide-angle lens from Canon for the G9, which I have to say works quite well. But, I do agree on the picture quality issue, it could use some improvement.
I don't know, the camera mockups looks fake to me too.
the back of the A1000IS looks good, with dimpled buttons, etc. But the back of the A2000IS looks totally flat.
the finger holding the camera profile looks odd too. If it's a top-down view to show the thickness of the camera... maybe. But try holding something in that manner, where you barely hold something from underneath ... possible yes but uncomfortable. Your thumb and index finger should be opposite each other for leverage, it's about to tip over and fall.
for the E1 the control pad on the back is not a Canon design style. Canon has been sticking with circular control style for a while. Not only that, the whole camera is bubbly and round EXCEPT the cross-type control.
It could be a no-name brand camera and someone could easily have photoshopped Canon on them and changed a few things... like I said, the cross-type pad seem unnatural.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
These seem legitimate.
Of course, what everyone's really waiting for is the 5D replacement :) which has to be the most anticipated camera in history!
they seem very easy photoshop to me. The reflections from below don't match the cameras, and also the way the camera's are stacked are WAY too flat. Just looking at the first image you can tell that the 3 camera's cannot be standing next to each other like that. They seem to be connected. I could do better 15 years ago with Photoshop 2.5. I would have gotten a "C" at most if I turned insomething like this for class.
In the A2000IS reflection IS the CANON logo is not even mirrored.
In the SX110is image, the reflection doesn't even show the front of the lens, that's some amazing light bending abilities.
I'm sorry, but whoever wrote this article needs to do a little more background check.
I'm waiting for the PowerShot G10. I don't have the budget for a dSLR, and would like a more professional camera.
The G9's image quality needs some improvement (canon increased the sensor size, but only tried to squeeze more pixels out of it), and it needs a wide-angle lens.
Okay, so the Photoshop work isn't perfect, but that doesn't mean they're fake. You're neglecting the camera mockups themselves, which appear to be quite legit!
@KarlW
You can buy a separate wide-angle lens from Canon for the G9, which I have to say works quite well. But, I do agree on the picture quality issue, it could use some improvement.
I don't know, the camera mockups looks fake to me too.
the back of the A1000IS looks good, with dimpled buttons, etc. But the back of the A2000IS looks totally flat.
the finger holding the camera profile looks odd too. If it's a top-down view to show the thickness of the camera... maybe. But try holding something in that manner, where you barely hold something from underneath ... possible yes but uncomfortable. Your thumb and index finger should be opposite each other for leverage, it's about to tip over and fall.
for the E1 the control pad on the back is not a Canon design style. Canon has been sticking with circular control style for a while. Not only that, the whole camera is bubbly and round EXCEPT the cross-type control.
It could be a no-name brand camera and someone could easily have photoshopped Canon on them and changed a few things... like I said, the cross-type pad seem unnatural.
xtian, your mom is fake. check this out, "http://ccsphoenixtest.com/"