Ha ha, true dat, and a way for us NYers to navigate from the left Manhattan-bound lane all the way to the right JFK-bound lane through traffic gaps would be a nice touch ;)
They're actually on the LIE in that shot, not the Van Wyck (the sign is to get onto the Van Wyck from the LIE)... not that that makes it any more convincing.
And what city is that supposed to be in the background, San Jose, CA?
Not the best shot to give out for publicity if you're touting the real-time traffic and 3D landmarks features.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Rob @ Aug 26th 2008 9:17AM
Not very convincing.... The permanent traffic jam on the Van Wyck Expressway is missing!!
buttabean @ Aug 26th 2008 9:24AM
haha you beat me to it
Dave B @ Aug 26th 2008 9:30AM
Ha ha, true dat, and a way for us NYers to navigate from the left Manhattan-bound lane all the way to the right JFK-bound lane through traffic gaps would be a nice touch ;)
Jeff @ Aug 26th 2008 10:48AM
They're actually on the LIE in that shot, not the Van Wyck (the sign is to get onto the Van Wyck from the LIE)... not that that makes it any more convincing.
And what city is that supposed to be in the background, San Jose, CA?
Not the best shot to give out for publicity if you're touting the real-time traffic and 3D landmarks features.