Comcast set to begin bandwidth capping come October 1st
By Joshua Topolsky 
posted August 29th 2008 9:28PM
posted August 29th 2008 9:28PM
posted August 29th 2008 9:28PM
A look back on popular stories from today in a specific year.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
"Then again, who likes the Man breathing down their pipeline?"
Not me!
ditto!
I dunno.. it would depend on how pretty he was :p.
sorry to cut but i have a question that nobody has answered yet. does this cap include streaming video from say hulu or youtube? if it does i hope charter communications doesn't adopt this.
THATS BULLSHIT.
I used 150GB down this month and 25GB UP
and i know that i did not download many things just P2P tv programs. thats stupid
What the fuck!?!?!?! At least this won't happen for a while for Cox users who are always around a year behind Comcast!!!
I'm laughing so hard because I know Comcast will lose a lot of customers. AT&T is going to get a crap load =D
@v3xx
it is applicable to everything u get from the net. say goodbye to downloading those movies to your ipod n xbox.
there is no way videos on demand is the future if they start capping bandwidth like this. i cant imagine how much 1080p movies would take up..
Jeeze, comcast already limit throttling dl speed so, now they even limit bandwidth, this sux. Booo comcast, I might just switch back to Earthlink or sumthing.
Ahhh 250GB!!!!
Us Canadians are capped at 90GB on our highest speeds - $100 a month, 8 Mbps.
Rogers sucks!!!
@erhan
you do realize that 150 + 25 = 175 and that 175 < 250, right? So you would be doing OK under the cap.
Oh goodie, right in time for Docsis 3.0!
You know, when Comcast makes these announcements, my area doesn't seem affected (which is kind of odd because I live in the suburbs of DC, which is almost Comcast's backyard). I've never experienced capping of any kind during the last few years. If anything it's annoying that they have increased there prices about 4 - 5 times for internet and digital TV. The cool part is we get HDTV DVRs for free for every TV and the internet speeds are much faster than as when we started (currently, 10mbit/1mbit, but the internet2 at college is a beast though [full gigabit ports/speed, w00t], sadly I don't live close enough to campus).
When Oct. comes around I'll do a mass loot of linux isos and see if I get capped/a phone call/etc.
darkstar,
You don't have to *imagine* how fast 1080p content would use up 250gb, all you have to do is break out a basic calculator.
Do not fear. I am sure comcast will let you buy more bandwidth. :) (how this is legal, I don't know) lets hope the throttling ends now and we see docsis 3.0 in october.
@brandon Too bad they already do. And have been for a while now.
http://www.cox.com/policy/limitations.asp
...yeah...it makes Comcast's new policy look like a godsend. However I don't think they've actually enforced it..since I use them too and haven't had any letters about it etc.
That's massive compared to what we get in Australia. $70/mo for 50GB, and we're slowed to 56k speeds if we go over. Bandwidth limits are usually split into peak/off-peak too (ie. 20GB between 0700 and 0100 (peak) and 30GB to use during the 'off-peak' time).
Your kidding!
I'm paying $50 for 7GB a month.
I'm paying $60 for 25GB. I don't want to see Comcast ruin broadband for America - tell Comcast it's NOT okay! Get a new provider! Get FIOS if you can, and if you can't ring em up and tell em you want it where you are :D
Wow. I used to feel like the US had the shaft with our comparatively inferior download speeds. But what good are download speeds with horrible monthly caps like that (and prices...even if they are AUD, are horrible). I truely pity you folks in Austrailia. I hope your telcoms get some sense knocked into them soon :-(
It reminds me of that ad being run by whatever phone company in Australia at the moment who claim that 3gig a month is "generous" and "huge".
I could go over that in an hour.
Sooo... greetings from Korea, land of someones unsecure router every block or so.
Fios is from Verizon, who are corporate shitheads just like comcast
250 GB is HUGE!
Here in India, I am paying equivalent to USD 23 for 8mbps link with a 6 GB cap. ugh! At 8mbps imagine how quickly I run out of my quota.
18/1 Mbps for 50 euros in Spain. No bandwidth cap.
Wow, I've used around 1GB today watching legal streams today. And that's just 3x25 mins...
I'm glad I have an ISP that charges for 2mbit but seems to cap it at 6mbit. Without any GB restrictions.
Excatly!
I would love to have 250GB a month! Right now i am stuck with 14GB on peek and off peek (so 28GB in total), and that is with 512kbs or something at $60 a month.
But really, it cant totally be blamed on the telcos. The main reason for sucky internet here is that there are hardly any underwater cables to get our internet. If there were more, i am sure the strain would be taken down, and our plans would get faster and cheeper
heh, you guys have it real easy!
i'm paying 30$ for 1 (yes ONE) GB per month for my wireless Broadband (3.5 G) HSDPA.
that's absurd, if i wanted 3GB per month it's 60$ and it goes on..
I do my heavy download at work :P
I was about to get really pissy about this, but then I read about other broadband providers considering limits in the 5-50GB range. So I'll just be only slightly pissy.
While I agree with you that the cap is certainly generous, it's not the size of the cap that bothers me. I feel like my habits fall well within the 250GB a month range.
Now they've said, "Here's the cap for everyone, it exists". I think that it will be much easier for them to start decreasing those caps slowly and most customers won't say anything, and when it starts to become the norm, who is stopping Verizon FiOS from adding caps to their service or any other ISP?
Good point - but adding regulations to my bandwidth in general just seems like blasphemy. And it would be nice if they countered that bandwidth regulation with some added features - like letting me freakin stream espn360!!!!
640K of memory, er um, 250 GB of bandwidth should be enough for anybody
I like how they still brag about the fast download speed in their ads. So it's great we have fast downloads and then they say you better watch what you're downloading. Q.
They actually have two speeds - "Fast" and "Banned for Life." What a delightful deal.
I have 8Mbps service from Comcast. If they give me an actual 8Mbps all the time (which of course they don't but they pretend to--even higher in bursts they say), then in less than 3 days I'll use up their 250GB cap. What am I supposed to do the rest of the month?
Simple, just sign up for 10 accounts :P
And what are people going to do when Comcast is the only provider available in their area? I'm glad I live in an area where I have alternatives.
....Comcast is the only one in my area. Verizon sold the Fios lines in New England so i have no hope of it coming here :-(
Massachusetts and New York are lousy with FIOS. So it's not all New England, and even then, Fairpoint is a good alternative to Comcast. But what about the people who live too far from the central office?
Data capping like this sets a dangerous precedent, especially when we're only going to be using more and more internet services as time goes on. This restriction by Comcast seems more like an admission that they can't keep up.
@mike: comcast just sold their lines in my area to fairpoint. we're fairpoint now :-) thank god.
@ JMM
not all the fiber was sold in New England. I was able to get FoIS here in Coventry (RI). Oddly enough we were able to get it because we live in an older section of a manufactured home park where ultily poles are still used (funny how the newer homes can't get FoIS yet due the underground cabling)
I hope though this doesn't become an industry standard
At least they are being honest about it.
Agreed.
They are being honest, and they've set the bar high.
If you're using that much, then you should be paying more (and they should provide a way for you to pay more) to do what you're doing.
This isn't just youtubing and email, here...you'd be doing a LOT of downloading to hit this limit.
You can hit the limit in legit ways too. Netflix is coming out next month for Xbox Live so streaming/downloading HD movies on a nightly basis will hit the cap too.
Plus think about all the services that are going to be going across the internet next year. Comcast is shooting themselves in the foot with this one.
If you don't have the infrastructure upgrade it if not lower speeds. Don't put a cap because you can't keep up...
So Microsoft sells me a unit and a subscription to it's XBOX Live. They also charge me for the content I choose to watch. Now Comcast is saying pay the "piper" for choosing to do those things. Trapped? I think so...Q
That's what is really bothering me about the cap. To be honest to exceed 250GB in a single month doing normal internet stuff, including torrents, seems unlikely. However, Microsoft and others are trying pretty hard to establish IPTV as a real alternative to cable television. So if you're using your internet for all the stuff your doing now plus all your TV and movie watching any kind of cap is going to be a problem. I think Comcast knows this too.
speaking of xbox live how much bandwidth does it actually take? never actually looked into it. i wonder if you play a few hours a day how much you'll use in a month
Games probably don't take that much. Downloading a video on the other hand...
Gaming is more about latency than bandwidth, i.e. how fast the water is going to flow versus how much fits in the pipe. Normal internet i.e. email and browsing adds up to so little it's inconsequential. The real big ones are the downloading of music (to a very small degree), videos, and programs.
Better start stacking up on those torrents people...doomsday draws near.