Sony demos battery-powered, fully-wireless OLED TV
What's better than a (cheap) XEL-1? How's about a wireless, battery-powered XEL-1? Sony has recently shown off a completely cordless OLED TV with the same ultrathin chassis as used in the aforementioned 11-incher. Bulking things up a bit is the integrated HDTV tuner, and of course, it's wall-mountable for midgets who live in a Little Tikes playhouse. Unfortunately, there's no real mention of specs (aside from the whole "3-millimeter thin" part), and even worse, there's no telling how long we'll have to wait before we see it hit shelves (let alone grow to a size that's actually useful). Anywho, tap the read link for a plethora of images.























omfg nerdgasm
OLED is great and all, and I know the technology is making progress, but let me know when it hits a usable size. 11" is a joke, sorry.
would be useful for a laptop, just not as part of you home cinema!
Seems great for a portable screen to play games on. Although, since it is so thin it might be easy to break...
nothin beats a midget joke
OLED TVs! Please "grow to a size that's actually useful". Those sizes start at 30 inches for TVs and 22 inches for PC/Mac monitors (though I'd prefer to use same thing for TV and for PC monitor needs).
couldn't you just say 22 inches for computers? I mean what does monitor size have to do with the OS?
WTF must everybody not mention linux I use Linux!!!!!
Me too Hungry but i dont make a big deal outta it, i use windows XP too should i brag about that? i don't care for Macs much though they definitely have there uses who cares what you use as long as you like and are comfortable with whatever OS you use, damn fanboys
Fix the comment rating styles Engadget. Neutral comments shouldn't be so light ... you only need to bury the low ranked ones
Neutral - dark
Highly/Highest ranked - dark
Low Ranked - light
He's right. It's bit hard to read the neutral comments.
Isn't making comments lighter a kind of censorship? It was fine the way it was before!
OK if you really want to make the "low ranking" hurt more and hopefully drive off some of the tools that have infiltrated Engadget lately?.. Then just have the "low Ranks" collapse. That way they're not in view by default, the tools don't get the negative attention and if i was curious i could just expand there post...
P.S. - Your welcome!!
---Or---
Low Ranked - light
Neutral - dark
Highly/Highest ranked - "On Fire"
Reading comments is like driving through foggy weather.
bring back lowest ranked while you're at it... then it can be even more eye-straining to read!
I find myself voting comments that are low ranked up again just so people can read them.
(not all of them of course, the ones with content)
the main problem with the new commenting system is that it is actually bad for your eyes. The low contrast between the background and comments results in eye strain. Also, people without the best eyesight will find it very difficult to read. Surely there's a better way to emphasise high ranked comments, such as font size or border colour/width. E.g. lowest ranked could be smaller font (which can be increased by clicking a "show me properly" type button), and high ranked comments could be use a larger/bold font and have a darker/thicker border...
I made a temp fix for those comments by editing UserContent.css in my firefox's chrome folder, but since it uses '.level1' as indicator that might conflict with other sites that use .level1 for something I guess :/'
Hopefully someone can bust out a Grease Monkey script for Firefox. I can barely stand reading the comments. I know Engadget don't care, but if it isn't fixed, I'm outta here -- not going to strain my eyes just to read comments. As others have mentioned only neutral should be light (if at all). If it collapsed it would be much better, or just leave it like it was before, it wasn't bothering anyone.
Interestingly enough it uses opacity to make the text faint rather than a straight color, way to use advanced functions eh, sigh.
Attempting a paste from the CSS:
.level1 { filter: alpha(opacity=40); opacity: .4; -moz-opacity: .4; }
I'm seeing that big box on the floor, and I'm not thinking thin and light... wake me when the screen size is bigger, the case size is smaller, and the price is a heck of a lot cheaper... ;)
Am I really the first comment to ask about battery life?
I was also wondering the same thing. What kind of battery is in there? It's gotta be something powerful if it's going to have good battery life.
Just enough for you to watch the commercials :)
sony should use these in the tz series vaios (as an option ofcourse)
sony should use them in the tz series vaios (as an option ofcourse)
I must be honest this is pretty impressive. I wonder why this hasn't been done before? There could easily be high powerful batteries in some of todays bigger HD sets.
The question is why you would need batteries in a big TV set anyway?
The Office, Season 4, Dinner Party
That looks like the pathetically small tv in Micheal's living room.
Strange to demo them at a dentist (from the looks of it)
I'm fairly certain that the Jawas had one of them inside that sand crawler of theirs.
wireless...on a pole?