Full HD at M-JPEG compression. Holy crap. Thats huge amounts of data. Shame they didnt implement H.264 compression.
Name
Email
Reason
In the article, it says they did. . . . . As to pricing, I'm hoping it's one of those things that works out to be £520/$550, cause ain't no way I'd pay $900 for a non DSLR. Sorry, brits.
Canon specs say M-JPEG. I wonder where Engadget got the H.264 spec from.
Canon's site says : Movies: MOV [H.264 + Linear PCM (stereo)]
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Full HD at M-JPEG compression. Holy crap. Thats huge amounts of data. Shame they didnt implement H.264 compression.
In the article, it says they did. . . . .
As to pricing, I'm hoping it's one of those things that works out to be £520/$550, cause ain't no way I'd pay $900 for a non DSLR. Sorry, brits.
Canon specs say M-JPEG. I wonder where Engadget got the H.264 spec from.
Canon's site says :
Movies: MOV [H.264 + Linear PCM (stereo)]