[groggit Posted Sep 25th 2008 9:40AM]

Hopefully this is Jasper, along with a price drop

[KAL326 Posted Sep 25th 2008 9:49AM]

It probably is a Jasper box given the all around 45nm drop. However, I would not expect a price drop again any time soon. $199.99 is a pretty cheap cost of admission for a next gen console.

[kangmink6 (Unverified) Posted Sep 25th 2008 11:18PM]

Oh man I wish it was named CHROME!

[Mitch Posted Sep 25th 2008 10:23AM]

He's made a post on his blog on the website showing it isn't a slimmer xbox.

http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/25/slimmer-xbox-360-spied-in-the-wild-sorry-but-no.aspx

[lax Posted Sep 25th 2008 10:29AM]

Ulucky people
http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/25/slimmer-xbox-360-spied-in-the-wild-sorry-but-no.aspx

[Kris (Unverified) Posted Sep 25th 2008 10:35AM]

Get your facts straight Engadget. Paul has posted additional photos on his blog to prove this isn't a thinner XBox 360.

http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2008/09/25/slimmer-xbox-360-spied-in-the-wild-sorry-but-no.aspx

[Billy (Unverified) Posted Sep 25th 2008 10:43AM]

I don't know, it's weird... The shot on this site, they really do look different. The one on the left looks a LOT smaller, a good 30% or so. But the shots he posted to rebuke it obviously show they are the same.

Perhaps it is barrel distortion (or whatever it's called)? Don't most non-Pro digicams severely stretch the far corners of pictures?

[Ethan Posted Sep 25th 2008 12:24PM]

The cupboard's just blocking a bit of the 360 off, yes?

[BJ is Gooder (Unverified) Posted Sep 25th 2008 12:27PM]

Can we stop calling it a ' next-gen' console yet?? I think its been out long enough to be called current.

[xValentine Posted Sep 25th 2008 1:01PM]

Hairy arms.

Same ol' 360.