Pandora pre-orders go live
By Nilay Patel 
posted September 30th 2008 11:32AM
posted September 30th 2008 11:32AM
posted September 30th 2008 11:32AM
A look back on popular stories from today in a specific year.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I ordered a Pandora and a TV-out cable 5 minutes after it went live around 7 AM Pacific. I didn't have money left for a case or dev fund donation, sadly.
As a dedicated Pandora fanboy and future developer, I would like to say a few words:
"WHEEEEEEEEE HA HA HAAAAA"
Shit, I might buy one.
This is either the coolest device ever, or the sexiest paperweight ever...
Ditto, although i was in such a hurry to get it preordered that I didn't even realize that there were extra accessories. What was the case? Did it have their logo on it or anything? Totally missed the Dev fund option. Oops.
In other words, the price is too high for a portable and they want to drum up fast sales by having a limited release, thus guaranteeing a complete sellout.
Yes, I do know there's a call for this item. If I can get a GP2X F200 for $170, then I should be able to get Pandora for around $200.
Orrrrr, they have to keep the first run limited because they're an entirely new company with no outside financial backing and as such could only afford to start off with 3000 units initially. These guys are enthusiasts who decided to give the open-source handheld market (not a very large one) a PROPER product. Whether it holds that promise remains to be seen, but there's very little speculation going on here.
No, actually they're having a limited release because of funding, Craigix is basically funding it all himself, so he does not have enough money to have a larger initial release. Plus the fact that the next batch can be revised, if any bugs get through the testing into this batch.
Wat.
Perhaps you could explain your logic, because that seems to make approximately zero sense. Since an Xbox 360 costs about $200, should I therefore be able to get a PS3 for ~$250? Perhaps more expensive maufacturing costs due to more expensive and better (more powerful and/or energy efficient) components would cause sale price to be higher? Nah, that's crazy talk.
The Wiz is a more direct successor to the GP2X than the Pandora. While their target demographic may be similar, the Pandora is a much more capable machine. If you just want to play homebrew games and emulators, if you really liked the GP2X, you'd probably like the Wiz. The Pandora is more powerful and versatile, so I don't see why the price is seen as so outrageous.
" If I can get a GP2X F200 for $170, then I should be able to get Pandora for around $200."
I can get an MSI Wind for $400, so I ought to be able to get a Macbook Pro for $600.
Seriously, you're comparing an admirable, yet underpowered and discontinued console against the Pandora and saying the Pandora could cost less. They would have a huge loss on each; the parts would cost more than the selling price.
Its akin to a sharp Zaurus but for gaming. That says ALOT because a Zaurus is almost double the price but with somewhat inferior hardware. So quit your bitchin and moaning.
It is 3000 because that is the lowest possible number you can get a manufacturer to make.
That has got to be the ugliest portable gaming handheld I've ever seen. It also seems insanely impractical to use.
1. That picture is not the final design.
2. That picture does not show the unclunkiness of the Pandora. The final case (injection molding costs too much to make small batches) will be smooth and streamlined; the console is slightly smaller than an original DS.
Here's an actual photo of the developer case:
http://openpandora.org/FDMphotos/9.jpg
Come on now Tuko, you know what its like to be referred to as “ugly” ;^). So, just ignore the “squareness” for a second. If you look at the layout, it’s actually quite well done. Nothing is missing from an ergonomics perspective. The only thing I would change is (1) a bigger screen and (2) a more rounded, organic looking design. Oh yea, and some coloreware pizzazz - http://www.colorwarepc.com/...
if they come up with an N64 emulator i would consider it.
"They" is the entire developer community, I take it?
ZodTTD was going to work on an N64 emulator, but he's put it on hold for now.
i'm really tempted by those specs, but alas i have no practical use for this.
Nice. That thing is so pwned!
wat?
xkcd
i am not gonna even read all the comments but i see a lot of people bitching about price.
its called economies of scale. they are running a limited release to make sure they really have a market for this product and its gonna cost more since they are not trying to produce 30,000 or 3,000,000 units. if they were making that many the price would surely be less.
I'm gonna wait for round two, and hope that any kinks that pop up in this first version get worked out with a lower price.
but, i hope this product gets a lot of support since this is that kind of thing that keeps companies competitive.
They're running a limited release because they don't have the funds to run a less limited one. It's not intended to be a huge commercial success (although that would be nice); their goal is to serve the community (and make some money on the side).
Whenever an article about the Pandora appears on a tech news site, there's always at least a couple, usually more, comments borne of ignorance about the target demographic and goals of the Pandora. The Pandora is not aiming to take on Sony or Nintendo. An average PSP or DS user who just wants to play games would probably have little interest in the Pandora. While a typical consumer could use and might even enjoy the Pandora, it tends to appeal more to the geek crowd, which as a whole tends to be more interested in function than form (one common criticism).
The second criticism of the Pandora is about the price. If you're buying a Pandora just to play a few SNES games or something like that, you're making a mistake. Go read the Pandora's specs at openpandora.ca. They are significantly better than the PSP's or the DS's. Articles on new pocket-sized MIDs appear on the front page of Engadget all the time. The Pandora is certainly capable of most, if not all, things those devices are. Look at the price of those MIDs. Still think the Pandora costs too much? The Pandora is essentially one of those combined with a gaming handheld.
Of course its specs are better than the psp and ds take a look at the difference in release dates.
And with the same proc as the Archos 5 and 7, it should be capable of playing the same (and more) formats
"so you'd better act fast -- $329 is all it takes to be a part of history, kids.", yah, the part of history when you send off your hard earned green for something that aint real. Dont worry, the Phantom and Gizmondo investors will stand by your side!
I'm sorry, but what proof do you have exactly suggesting this isn't real?
Just haven't heard of the company before?
Dear oh dear...
If anyone is interested I have developed a very nice app to transorm your new Pandora in a turn by turn GPS device using google maps.
Voice recognition requires modding a mic in it but I'm working on that too.
The Pandora already has a microphone; it doesn't have GPS or an accelerometer though, so how are you doing this (other than with an addon GPS)?
Exactly as you said . With a GPS add-on.
Speech recog. (if you want to use one of the well tried prog. protocols) requires a better mic.
Unless the final commercial device will sport a stereo mic.
Yea, I just secured my pre-order. This is actually what I wanted from a MID, but most MIDs didn't plan on having gaming controls included.
This is the MID for the gamer.
Bought.
If I hadn't just sunk $300 on a G1 preorder, I'd be all over this thing. Sadly my gadget budget just can't afford it right now. Damn shame, too, I've been waiting for this thing for quite a while.
I'll stick to my iPod Touch and PSP. What's the point of being portable if this thing isn't portable?
It is portable and most of the size is due to the huge battery relatively speaking with 10+ hour avg battery life and 8 or so minimum. remember this thing is slightly smaller than the original DS
isn't portable? It's slightly smaller than an original DS I believe. It is 140x83x27mm
http://www.sizeasy.com/page/size_comparison/16292-Sony-PSP-vs-Nintendo-DS-vs-Pandora
If a PSP is portable then Pandora is as well. Not sure where you are going with this.
the picture on this page makes it look enormous! they should have included an everyday item for perspective. that's why people don't realize it's DS sized. that and they're too stubborn to read like the first 5 comments.
i think the specs are awesome for its size and what it's intended for -gaming. however, it would also be nice to have a front-face camera on that thing. imagine skype or other software developed for this platform. gps as well. i see potential there for much more, but sounds like a great start.
im certainly no ubuntu fanboy (I like debian itself better ) but it has been ported to the device and the video is on youtube with xfce and gimp running at quite respectable speeds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOPNurKei0I
How exactly is it not portable?
PSP Slim and Lite's dimensions: 170mm x 71mm x 19mm
Pandora's dimensions: 140mm x 83mm x 27mm
http://openpandora.ca/images/pand09050_logo3a.JPG
Whoops, that post failed. Didn't reply to correct post AND the wrong picture URL.
http://openpandora.org/images/comparison.jpg
Lack of X86 made me go for an Aspire One which is ALMOST handheld and good enough for me. If it were truly open source then the blueprints would be online now (perhaps they are and I am just ignorant to their presence). And if that is the case then the price should come down due to competition from other manufacturers and perhaps someone will make an X86 version. (Altho ARM Linux seems to be becoming more popular (I think android does it) and a few others so X86 may become unnecessary But till then it is not worth it for me as I want to use it for general purpose computing as well.
It's called "open source" because it runs Linux and you can mod it and make your own games for it. The blueprints aren't out because they wanted to make some money off of it (an admirable goal). Perhaps somebody will "make an x86 version" some day by cramming a pico-ITX motherboard into a modified case, but it isn't likely.
You don't realize that getting a chip as good as the OMAP one (and as cheap and portable) with a X86 would've been impossible.
Besides, ARM chips consume much less power as they're made for handhelds.
I wonder who will be the first to run Android on this. I mean, turning Pandora into a sound alternative of iPhone shouldn't be that hard. Which might perhaps help boost the sales a bit ...
no GSM CDMA or any cellular support for that matter other than maybe through a USB adaptor you will still need a cell phone of some type
Apples & Oranges? Does this thing have a cellular radio? Does it even have a mic? Would you want to hold this brick up to your ear? and why would it compete with iPhone? It would only compete with the Tmobile G1.
it has a mic ... quality yet to be determined
I know it's a private basement project, I know it's poorly funded, I know it emulates many machines (except what matters; the psp)... but sorry 329 is way too much. I can have a slim PSP with a memory stick loaded with PSP iso games (and MAME, and GBA, and SNES...) on ebay for less than $200....
I hope it sells well, though.
the pandora can clock up to 900mhz and has a pretty beefy GPU similar to the one in the dreamcast only a later iteration of it
the PSP clocks up to 333mhz isn't that right? so even at its defaults the pandora has a 200mhz edge
of course mhz isn't everything but don't forget that the arm cortex-a8 in the pandora is considerably faster than even ARM11's clocked at teh same speed