BlackBerry Storm 9500 hands-on

Gallery: BlackBerry Storm hands-on
Hardware
RIM's going back to its roots here, and once again reminding us why corporate users tend to holster their phones instead of pocket them -- the Storm is a large one. It's not that you can't slide it into a jeans pocket (it's 0.55-inches thick), and in fact, there's no particular dimension that the Storm exaggerates beyond reason in comparison to, say, an iPhone, but folks who felt that Apple was already pushing boundaries there won't take kindly to this beefy phone. The traditional BlackBerry weight advantage is gone as well -- the Storm's large glassy touchscreen and related clicking mechanism, in addition to a very solid build means the weight certainly matches the size.

The 3.25-inch screen itself is bright, colorful and high-resolution (480 x 360). Video playback is sharp and smooth, and the extra pixels on the large screen means eye fatigue won't be much of an issue. Unfortunately, as far we can tell there's no hardware video acceleration, which shouldn't be a problem for correctly-compressed video, but there aren't any Apple or Nokia-style swooping transitions in, we don't have high hopes for gaming, and stuff like browsing through photos and and panning around web pages is fairly choppy. The lack of hardware acceleration could also cut down on battery life, which RIM is pegging at 15 days of standby and 5.5 hours of talk, but hasn't fleshed out with media playback figures.
In addition to the touchscreen, there's a full complement of standard buttons for getting things done: rocker switch and camera button on one side of the device; another function button on the other side; call, end, back and BlackBerry buttons on the face; invisible mute and lock buttons up top.

Software
Like we said before, RIM didn't want to reinvent the wheel here, and didn't. In fact, almost the entire interface -- besides the recent aesthetic overhaul enjoyed by both the Bold and the Storm, which brought much needed perks like readable fonts and a modicum of glamor -- is standard BlackBerry. That means the standard, business-friendly strengths of RIM remain intact, while some of the long-standing interface annoyances (like incessant scrolling) can be overcome with a simple tap or click of the touchscreen.

In standard RIM fashion, one-handed navigation is a priority and totally doable, but now there's actually room for two hands, which could speed all sorts of actions -- click the app switcher button with one thumb, tap your desired app with the other, not mind-blowing, but helpful. There are other perks brought on by touch that will take a bit of exploration to discover. For instance, if you tap and hold the screen (without clicking) on an email address or an email subject for a couple seconds, the phone will search for related emails. Multitouch makes a reluctant appearance in the form of two-fingered selection. Hold one finger above and another finger below a block of text to select it, then tap and drag to fine-tune the selection. Unfortunately, stuff like two-fingered zooming and rotation isn't happening here, but RIM promises to work on other helpful uses for touching -- it feels a tad underutilized in its present form.

Speaking of the browser, RIM has made great strides in the past year or so, but its homebrewed Java-based app still doesn't quite match the Nokia / Apple / Google-favored WebKit in terms of rendering speed and accuracy. We also didn't see the sort of smooth and effortless scrolling the iPhone provides, that no other touch phone has managed to replicate so far.
RIM's core apps are obviously just as solid as ever when it comes to email, calendaring and contacts, and are increasingly being integrated with the browser and outside apps like Facebook. What's still lacking is a truly powerful and cohesive media player -- it still seems tacked-on, though the search feature in the music app is a nice touch. RIM's clearly working on this, but there's more to be done. At the time this post goes live we're still not sure if those leaked App Center screenshots are legit, but it'd certainly be a nice shot at Apple and Google, and a chance to bring RIM's existing developer community to the forefront.
Wrap-up
Carrier (Verizon) and budget (unknown) constraints aside, what it's probably going to boil down to is whether or not the BlackBerry OS is your style. RIM hasn't done an overhaul to make touchscreen viable, instead banking on its navigation / execution paradigm to make the transition to touch -- which for the most part it does brilliantly. RIM hasn't in any way made the phone unattractive to its traditional corporate loyalists, and might just manage to snag other users looking for a flashy phone with decent email, but when it comes to browsing, media playback and other forms of consumer-friendliness, RIM still has a ways to go.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Ebel3003 @ Oct 8th 2008 12:06AM
Finally, some action shots rather than videos of the phone flying around on the screen.
Thanks!
a ham sandwich @ Oct 8th 2008 1:33AM
this phone looks AWESOME!
some (probably stupid and obvious) questions:
1. what kind of calendar syncing does it support?
2. what email protocols (i assume the basic imap and pop3?) does it support push?
3. how does it group sms messages? (iphone-style conversation, or straight up inbox list?
thanks!
Jash Sayani @ Oct 8th 2008 4:40AM
Wow! It has a seriously amazing interface !!!
karondo @ Oct 8th 2008 5:22AM
@a ham sandwich:
if it's like a normal blackberry (which it probably will be since it's pretty much the same software)
1. exchange if you're on a bes or gmail sync if you're not (you've got to install the gmail app though)
2. pop3/imap4/owa/exchange (exchange only if you cough up for a bes)
3. both - it lists them all as an individual message, and then if you go into it, it then lists the history iphone style
Seanross @ Oct 9th 2008 8:39AM
@a ham sandwich
3. how does it group sms messages? (iphone-style conversation, or straight up inbox list?
You mean Palm Treo style conversation ;)
TheGuy @ Oct 14th 2008 6:13PM
Why is the WiFi missing????
Such a perfect phone and you had to skip out on one small thing....!! Why why why?!?!
Jack H @ Oct 18th 2008 10:41AM
@ TheGuy
"and enough radios to give your grandkids cancer"
they prolly couldnt fit any mor ein it
thefiendster @ Oct 8th 2008 12:07AM
im so getting this phone.
Newtown @ Oct 8th 2008 12:10AM
Looks nice but the no wifi is a huge letdown.
Seth @ Oct 8th 2008 1:09AM
Even though it is a letdown, I would take this over the T-Mobile G1 any day. It looks sexier, hardware and software both.
nerdtalker @ Oct 8th 2008 1:57AM
The sheer number of people who are always clamoring for wifi seriously drives me insane. I can honestly count the number of times I've used WiFi on my HTC Mogul on one hand. Perhaps with the counter intuitively rising cost of 3G data (or perhaps the positively draconian AT&T 3G data costs) drives everyone to whine for wifi all day, but, honestly, what's the point of having data everywhere if you're back to searching for a usable wifi hotspot?
WiFi is near, just nearly, worthless when you have "unlimited" (to 5GB) of data. Seriously. I keep wifi turned off all the time.
ryan @ Oct 8th 2008 2:01AM
you can thank Verizon for that.
Patriks7 @ Oct 8th 2008 2:18AM
Same for me. I'm looking for a nice touchscreen phone with wifi so that whenever I'm in school I don't have to take out my laptop to quickly check a site or my e-mail.
dotAaron @ Oct 8th 2008 6:38AM
@nerdtalker
Im sorry, but many many people love wifi as an option - its almost a standard in high end phones now and for this highly anticipated phone to lack it is a big let down.
Personally i use wifi all the time, my phone automatically connects to my home and uni networks when i walk near them - so i get a seamless, fast and free internet connection. Can't live without it :)
7on @ Oct 8th 2008 9:44AM
Last I checked Verizon doesn't allow WiFI on their phones in fear or VoIP or people not buying the Dataplans.
funnyperson1 @ Oct 8th 2008 11:45AM
Wifi is crucial for me. I go to college in the middle of nowhere, and theres no 3G signal, and when you're inside the stone buildings, there isn't a reliable Edge signal either (AT&T with Blackjack and iPhone3G). There is however Wifi coverage EVERYWHERE.
Kam @ Oct 8th 2008 2:27PM
Do you really need Wi-Fi? Verizon's superior 3G network is well deserved. Having wifi is not needed, providers like AT&T and Tmobile need wifi to substitute the terrible coverage, lol.
WickedEast @ Oct 8th 2008 5:49PM
With sucky 3G from iPhone+AT&T, you do need wifi.
TheAre @ Oct 10th 2008 8:29AM
The fact this has no wifi is a let down, I have 3G in daytona beach where I work, however there is no 3G 10 miles away where my home is and that is when edge is available, luckily my iPhone 3G will recognize my wifi setup (AirPort base stations, 1 master and a slave for extended coverage) so I don't have to rely on edge, I like to listen to internet radio on my iPhone and edge is not fast enough to stream music like 3G and wifi can.
sam @ Oct 12th 2008 11:42PM
@7on
You seem to be misinformed about wifi on verizon phones. I am a verizon customer and my last phone (as of last month) most definitely had wifi. and you can't use VoIP types of clients or servers on smartphone's meager browsers. so thats a mute point
Golferal @ Oct 23rd 2008 7:42PM
Those of you without solid 3G coverage *cough* *AT&T* *TMobile* *cough* seem to be the only ones who care about wifi. I've had it on my last 3 Sprint phones and have turned it on maybe 3 times. It's really not necessary when you have EVDO, especially rev A.
JB @ Oct 24th 2008 9:28PM
I am very much hoping that T-Mobile picks up this phone. Also hoping that, when they take out the Verizon radio, they put in a wifi radio. The ONLY reason I would get this phone is for the improved interface, but I can't live without my UMA wifi-calling. If they didn't put UMA on it, I wouldn't buy it.
who? @ Oct 8th 2008 12:10AM
No Wi-Fi. My iPod Touch tops that.
JohnTitor @ Oct 8th 2008 12:27AM
no flush? my toilet tops your touch
who? @ Oct 8th 2008 12:54AM
Ah, thank you for proving my real point- this does not top the iPhone because of a couple more features! ;-)
GON @ Oct 8th 2008 1:34AM
Like Copy & Paste?
iKurt @ Oct 8th 2008 12:10AM
No wifi = no sale.
Just another iPhone clone w/out WiFi... move along folks...
paul @ Oct 8th 2008 12:18AM
the iPhone didnt invent touchscreen phones. jesus christ stop talking about the iPhone like its the Wonder Bread of the cell phone world. No copy/paste? No video? NO MMS?!? who the fuck are you kidding.
iKurt @ Oct 8th 2008 12:22AM
^^ I didn't say that iPhone invented the touch screen phone. Keep the irrelevant comments to yourself.
The iPhone sets the industry standard for touchscreen phones, and that's a fact.
iDouche @ Oct 8th 2008 11:13PM
i can't wait to punch you in the face.
Eddie @ Oct 8th 2008 1:15AM
Am I the only one who doesn't sit at home on his wifi network with his phone? :(
GON @ Oct 8th 2008 1:35AM
Clones are supposed to be worse than the perceived original product.
Mark Anderson @ Oct 8th 2008 5:05AM
@iKurt
Did. Past tense.
walk @ Oct 8th 2008 4:02PM
@ chris
maybe he is french and therefore douche is shower.
do u shower? no? maybe should "open your mind" and move away from your computer for 5 minutes everyday
Jimmy @ Oct 27th 2008 5:04AM
@paul
you're totally right. the iPhone is *this close* to being a just another phone in an already cluttered market. Its missing integral parts of what we consider a smart phone to be. How is it that i can not take a photo and send it to friends, family or co-workers. Hell, ive used copy and paste three times in writing this reply. What Apple has down is integration, and its executed quite nicely. integration between apps and the iphone, integration between the i phone and other Mac systems (hardware and software). I have spent quite a bit of time exploring a friends first-gen iphone and am now considering a 3G iphone for myself. I currently have a RIM ( BlackBerry Pearl) and im wondering how the 3G would fair against it, but now the Storm and the upcoming HTC Touch HD in the mix, it changes things.
People (almost always Mac fanboys) think that the iPhone was completely ground breaking, which it was certainly not. It essentially just took what was already out there and brought it together with the Apple design standard and ease of use. so people, stop acting like the world revolves around a piece of fruit.
Ben @ Oct 8th 2008 10:42PM
LOL
enough radios to give you kids cancer.
Flashpoint @ Oct 8th 2008 12:13AM
I LOVE IT.
But that Verizon software has gotta go
reuvypoo @ Oct 8th 2008 12:21AM
The only Verizon software on it is VZNavigator.
sithlord 24 @ Oct 8th 2008 12:26AM
the verizon software is not on blackberry's
reuvypoo @ Oct 8th 2008 12:16AM
Does it have a proximity sensor?
Paul Miller @ Oct 8th 2008 12:20AM
Yup.
reuvypoo @ Oct 8th 2008 12:22AM
Thank you for replying so quickly. I assume you loved the device then?
Paul Miller @ Oct 8th 2008 12:56AM
Yeah, I do. Still waiting to hear what the price will be, but right now I'm personally torn between this, the G1 and the iPhone. They all have a ton of positives, and each have their fair share of drawbacks.
Pros:
G1: Google integration, cheap, cheap network, app potential, physical keyboard.
iPhone: iTunes integration, browser, apps, size.
Storm: BlackBerry OS, Verizon coverage, awesome typing.
Cons:
G1: Very beta-ey, T-Mobile, rather fat.
iPhone: App store lockdown, typing, AT&T 3G coverage
Storm: Probably more expensive, Verizon data charges, BlackBerry OS, no app store (yet).
Tough choice!
Eddie @ Oct 8th 2008 1:06AM
Paul pretty much summed up my thoughts...
In november I'll be deciding if I want to stay on Verizon with this or move to Tmo for the G1...
oh the choices.
Chris @ Oct 8th 2008 1:22AM
Oh. My. God.
An Engadget user who is open-minded and wants to choose the right device for his/her personal needs? What the hell is going on around here? You either love or hate Apple, Google, RIM, Nokia or Sony. Don't break the rules.
It's like an American who went into this Presidential election with an open mind. They don't exist.
vypergts @ Oct 8th 2008 8:44AM
Which one has the best battery life? All these huge screens gotta be sucking the juice. Maybe that is why they left out wi-fi?
Bob @ Oct 8th 2008 9:13PM
What does a proximity sensor do on the Storm?
Rabin @ Oct 9th 2008 11:24PM
@Bob,
Maybe it senses other idiot verizon users around, like myself, to laugh at 'em.
Bob @ Oct 26th 2008 10:06PM
Ok, this is the real Bob, my name has been hijacked twice now!!??
Anyway...
It's time to knock it off with the "beta-ey" comments on Android, come on guys, don't call something "beta-ey" if you haven't used it. I wouldn't call the Storm "beta-ey," cause I haven't used it. To do that is just ignorant and uninformed.
zach @ Oct 8th 2008 12:18AM
dock included?