Yeah, but given that spin is a "physical property" and is either one or the other, a simple comparison with polarity works. A "real" and in-depth explanation about something that does not belong to classical physics has no end, not in the least on a website where apple and MS zealots fight it out.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
This is interesting, it could mean infinite stacks of transistors on a tiny tiny die.
Engadget: Spin is a quantum mechanical quantity without a physical analogue. It has nothing to do with magnetics or domains or anything like that.
Yeah, but given that spin is a "physical property" and is either one or the other, a simple comparison with polarity works. A "real" and in-depth explanation about something that does not belong to classical physics has no end, not in the least on a website where apple and MS zealots fight it out.
This conversation gives me renewed hope that there are intelligent commenters on Engadget.