Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"We need a digital camera that can be switched on and fire off that first shot fast. It's not a commonly tracked statistic on any review site, and nobody seems to have this information for every camera. We were hoping other readers could inform us as to what small digital cameras can fire off their first pics in under a second (ideally under half a second). It needs to be small, but mostly, just really quick in operation. Thanks!"
I have to echo what TJ said. I see no reason at all to pay extra for 22 Mbps with the same 250 GB cap in place. As it is, I get about 4.16 Mbps from Comcast. In download capacity alone, that would equate to 1.87 GB per hour. For a 30 day month, the service I pay for should allow for a total download of 1350 GB. So their cap is restricting me to less than 20% of my "unlimited" internet access. Bumping my speed to 22 Mbps drops my usage to about 3.3% of my "unlimited" internet access.
Do very very few people download that much ? Indeed. I am a big Dead fan, so in addition to the occasional TV show, movie, and music downloads, I also download - completely legal I might add - Grateful Dead concerts in FLAC or SHN format. Since Comcast instituted their cap, I am using a network meter and over the last 10 days I'm averaging about 5 GB per day (up and down - most stuff I get over BT).
I don't know that there is a point here, but if your network can support 22 Mbps on the one hand, then there is really no reason to be restricting total network traffic to 250 GB on the other hand.
Basically this all just supports the idea that Comcast is simply clueless when it comes to customer service. It's like the water company putting in new huge pipes and saying they can now deliver 1000 gallons per minute to every household. Oh, but each household is still limited to 750 gallons per day.