Can anyone tell me what "98% colour gamut" means? What colour space do manufacturers quote when they say this? sRGB?
It is a nice monitor though, but have to agree with the resolution - I'm struggling to read websites on 1280x800 on a 13" screen, and something tells me the text size would be similar on 23" panel at that native rez.
color gammut without other qualifications generally signifies NTSC, so it's still less than 90% aRGB
And i do laugh at that mac usage there... perhaps they want to get rid of the 23" cinema display by offering 30% more pixels and 100 times the contrast (though only cheap dynamic type)
The new FiOS HD DVR, arguably the biggest update since Verizon released a DVR, thanks to its external storage support, enhanced multi-room functionality and slick new 16x9 HD user interface.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Can anyone tell me what "98% colour gamut" means? What colour space do manufacturers quote when they say this? sRGB?
It is a nice monitor though, but have to agree with the resolution - I'm struggling to read websites on 1280x800 on a 13" screen, and something tells me the text size would be similar on 23" panel at that native rez.
They usually use the NTSC gamut as the benchmark.
it will actually be a lot easier. the pixel pitch (as i said above) is 0.249mm. your 13" has a 0.216mm pitch.
color gammut without other qualifications generally signifies NTSC, so it's still less than 90% aRGB
And i do laugh at that mac usage there... perhaps they want to get rid of the 23" cinema display by offering 30% more pixels and 100 times the contrast (though only cheap dynamic type)
@ Mike (or anyone)
So NTSC is exactly how wide in sRGB/aRGB terms?
HIGH PIXEL DENSITY does not have to mean SMALL TEXT. Just adjust the font scaling in the OS!