Though I agree with Nilay's comment that the OS on this is only slightly less ugly than Nokia's, I also have to agree with matic50 and ask what kind of drugs Nilay was taking when he wrote that it's not in the same league as *other* high-end touchscreen smartphones. The 'other' suggests that Nilay here thinks that the 5800 is intended to be high-end, which obviously shows that Nokia has done a good job as they've fooled yet another supposed tech expert into thinking that their mid-range device was aimed for the high-end.
"I'm moving to a small studio and for some reason the cable connection is in an awkward place and I need a way to transmit HD quality video and audio no more than 20 feet away. What is the best wireless HDMI transmitter / receiver for this situation? Thanks!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Though I agree with Nilay's comment that the OS on this is only slightly less ugly than Nokia's, I also have to agree with matic50 and ask what kind of drugs Nilay was taking when he wrote that it's not in the same league as *other* high-end touchscreen smartphones. The 'other' suggests that Nilay here thinks that the 5800 is intended to be high-end, which obviously shows that Nokia has done a good job as they've fooled yet another supposed tech expert into thinking that their mid-range device was aimed for the high-end.