Alright, alright. There's a few things going on here. First off, Reggie Fils-Aime told Forbes "I will be able to say our licensees 'get it' when their very best content is on our platform, and with very few exceptions today, that's not the case." That's a pretty good conversation starter right there. He also lamented the absence of Grand Theft Auto and Spore on his platform, teased community features without spilling anything at all, and for kicks threw us this utterly hopeless word on a price cut: "At some point, it will be time to adjust the [price], but we're nowhere near that point now." We're pretty astonished that a console honcho like Reggie would so summarily insult his third-party partners, but we can't help but agree -- though peep Nintendo Wii Fanboy's via link down there for an alternate perspective on the matter. To us, the question really lies in the blame game: is Nintendo's Wii strategy and unique hardware approach to blame, or is everybody else out there too dense to cash in? But really, this is just too wild, too incendiary, too awesome for us to hog all the discussion. Hit up the vaguely-applicable poll option, and then let loose in the comments. We're all ears!

[Via Nintendo Wii Fanboy]
What's to blame for a lackluster collection of third party games on the Wii?
Third parties aren't trying hard enough3908 (23.4%)
Peripheral-oriented first party strategy1286 (7.7%)
Nintendo's secrecy829 (5.0%)
Graphics / processing limitations 3887 (23.3%)
Lack of serious online functionality779 (4.7%)
None of the above262 (1.6%)
All of the above5311 (31.8%)
Lackluster? Not so fast.419 (2.5%)

0 Comments

Reggie thinks third-parties don't 'get' the Wii: discuss