"We want to give our wireless customers maximum choice – in innovative devices, applications, operating systems, and more. One way to maximize customer choice is to begin to reduce fragmentation in the wireless OS environment. That is why we are a member of the Symbian Foundation."
That doesn't make one bit of sense. What does he mean by "fragmentation" then? Well, he seems to go on to explain it a bit...
"...fragmentation puts a heavy burden on wireless carriers, handset makers, and especially apps developers, who have to create for multiple operating systems..."
OK, so first he wants to reduce fragmentation, which he eventually says is partially the result of multiple OS's, yet he says he wants people to have maximum choice with all sorts of devices, apps, OS's, and more, and then says, "by the way, we're adding Symbian too."?
That makes absolutely no sense. He's contradicting himself in the same train of thought. And how would offering maximum choices ever reduce fragmentation in the first place?
This guy would make a fantastic politician... Q: "Do you believe in the war?" A: "Yes. No. Yes. No."
Look, AT&T, if you reduce all of our choices, we're out, your loss. The end.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
"We want to give our wireless customers maximum choice – in innovative devices, applications, operating systems, and more. One way to maximize customer choice is to begin to reduce fragmentation in the wireless OS environment. That is why we are a member of the Symbian Foundation."
That doesn't make one bit of sense. What does he mean by "fragmentation" then? Well, he seems to go on to explain it a bit...
"...fragmentation puts a heavy burden on wireless carriers, handset makers, and especially apps developers, who have to create for multiple operating systems..."
OK, so first he wants to reduce fragmentation, which he eventually says is partially the result of multiple OS's, yet he says he wants people to have maximum choice with all sorts of devices, apps, OS's, and more, and then says, "by the way, we're adding Symbian too."?
That makes absolutely no sense. He's contradicting himself in the same train of thought. And how would offering maximum choices ever reduce fragmentation in the first place?
This guy would make a fantastic politician... Q: "Do you believe in the war?" A: "Yes. No. Yes. No."
Look, AT&T, if you reduce all of our choices, we're out, your loss. The end.