Is stripped user agent data pointing to a Google OS?
By Jacob Schulman 
posted December 7th 2008 8:08PM
posted December 7th 2008 8:08PM
[Via Boy Genius Report]
posted December 7th 2008 8:08PM
A look back on popular stories from today in a specific year.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Chrome? You're using that as an indicator of a Google OS? I guess it must be based on the NT kernel then (;
Ummm... No. They're talking about the OS identifier strings that come along when a web client makes a request from an HTTP(s) server.
Chromes not even available on OSX yet...
What that suggests to me is that a Google OS will be only half baked..
Fo0, that makes no sense. If Google makes its own operating system, I would hope that it would be POSIX-compliant and run Linux apps, instead of having its own API's and having to start from scratch writing software for it ...but that is an entirely different issue from porting applications between operating systems.
I meant the snark to be at Oli D, not Fo0 ... My apologies, Fo0!
@HighTeckRedNeck
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OpenSolaris (and others) are completely different beasts than Linux, yet can run Linux Binaries. Some things, like VMware, that require certain kernel features, don't work, but FireFox, Staroffice, etc all work
Google already uses a customized FS for it's server farm operations, I'm sure it has a unbelievably customized version of linux as well. You can learn more about their operations here: http://blog.topix.com/archives/000016.html The article is a bit dated, circa 2004, but it gives you a nice picture of the state of their technology 4 years ago. My guess is that these obfuscated OS strings are being generated by machines running their custom OS for search testing purposes.
This is even worse than the apple speculation...
I remember some pretty outrageous speculation about some sort of "iPhone" way back in the day...
Apple make a phone?!
pshhhhhhhh
Nope, just a brick with a touch-screen.
iPhone is their marketing thing...
Will it be Linux based?
Likely, but like all linux distro's without configuring Wine or Crossover, itll be another hard to fight with compatibility fest
Actually I remember that when this speculation started, Google said that they ran Ubuntu but modified it a bit... which led to the Goobutntu speculation strand...
I would really like to see the chrome errr... chrome (i mean the web browser's toolbar, titlebar and such) designs into gnome... Imagine the skinning possibilities?
But I think that this might not happen.
It's about time for Google to put an OS out there, the way they have their applications (chrome, gmail, RSS feed, etc.) just does not make sense anymore, they need a desktop OS to bring everything toghether something like G.HO.ST did.
Google? World domination? Don't be ridiculous. I mean just because #THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN INTERCEPTED AND THE USER HAS BEEN TERMINATED THROUGH MEANS OF FRIGGIN' LASER BEAMS. HAVE A NICE DAY# End of Message.
If G-Mail is in beta now, I can't wait to see what it'll be like when it finally emerges. Maybe instead
of hotkeys it'll be a neural interface.
It is to early to talk abour google os even chrome is beta and not stable.
Google has a thing for betas, if Gmail ever leaves beta I'll... well, I don't know, but it'll be crazy.
when is a google product NOT beta? :P
I have this theory that Google's ultimate plan is to have all of their stuff come out of beta at once, and make a gigantic deal out of it.
Naw, Google plans to keep everything in beta until the human race is completely reliant on their products (ever go a day without Google?!), then pull everything out of beta and charge for it.
Or demand world domination.
I bet the OS will be called Google Beta.
Your spelling is not stable.
"When is a Google product NOT beta ?"
I'm not 100% sure but I'd say it's when you stop using IT and it starts using YOU.
I don't think a software developer ever makes a product that actually comes out of Beta. There is Beta, and Beta Release, they just worked a few more bugs out before releasing and then they patch it to get it in to final release. Hell look at 98 it didn't stop getting updates until after End of Life. This applies to all companies not just Microsoft, I am looking at you too Apple constant iPhone patches that we have to keep hearing even if all they do is add a pocket rocket app that causes the phone to vibrate at different frequencies and intervals.
my theory about why google keeps everything in beta is because software is never really "finished". there will always be an update of some sort, and bug fixes, especially web based apps. I dont think its meant to be used in the traditional way, but more as a tongue 'n cheek humor of the software industry.
Web software should be considered "Beta" since new updates and features are constantly added, and nothing is actually "released" to be installed to receive those updates. Software should come out of Beta when it's ready to be released as a new version (1.0, 2.5, etc...), which would mean it has something to actually install.
Everything Google does is permanently stuck in beta.
That said, gimme Google OS!!!
So... will I see relevant ads every time I turn on my PC? This notion actually frightens me, considering what most of my used disk space is comprised of.
The exact same arguments were made before Android was released.
* Every single application would be filled with ads.
* You would have to listen to a 30 second ad before making a phone call.
* It would be in constant beta.
Well, version 1.0 was released, and there were no built-in ads.
So much for rumors.
Thank you for alleviating me. I was worried Google would discover my complete, and meticulously organized, collection of My Little Pony animated series episodes.
the hell kind of porn is that??
Horses/ponies don't really do it for me.
Unicorns all the way.
I don't see that there would be ads in the OS - that's just totally unprofessional. I'm sure Google would make their money by signing deals with companies and preload tons of software on the OS (and of course all of Google's stuff).
Hilarious thread, one million internets each.
I ain't really into horse/ pony's/ unicorn porn, i prefer human porn.
Does that make me weird?
Rule 34 is alive and well.
It would only make sense for them to create an OS , android is going well. Google created a web browser, and donated a lot of time etc to the wine project. My guess is it will run all the windows apps or most , through wine.
I wouldn't mind a decent free operating system. A few unobtrusive ads on unused portions of my desktop/titlebar don't annoy me much. My main fear is that since google ads are based on what you are doing, is that when I am watching porn I will see some pretty weird ads.
Good 'ol Google's just trying to expand your horizons.
So you admit to watching porn? Well hey at least your honest
It's not like watching porn is unnatural. I guess for the underage it is.
Actually, I think it's more popular for the underaged people.
"Birthday is 1990"... So, 18. Now how long have you been doing this, then?
And I'd consider it unnatural.
Probably gone blind by now hehe
People watch porn. It's a multi-billion dollar industry. Online sales alone amount to several billion every year.
Paying for porn is unnatural.
In my opinion, it's much better for a kid to watch porn than stupid violence on CNN or alike.
Or is there anyone who thinks that exposed brains are "safer" for a kid to see than a beautiful naked woman with a rather handsome naked dude doing it?
Right, there's "porn" and there's "pr0n", but still, less of an ill-impact than guns, blood and violence imho...
Right... yankees, I forgot.
Feed your kids with war and shit like that instead of sex, but then don't be surprised at 14-year old having babies or worse, diseses, because of inapropriate sexual education.