I am probably in the Minority, but when I first sa 120Hz on my XBR4, my Jaw dropped. It was so realistic... I thought I could make out the camera movements and all... the isue I had was that on fast moving action, the processor could not generate the frames fast enough, the faster the motion the worse it got but that only happens in 1-2% of the time on a given movie... I figured they'd go up in multiples of 180Hz or 240Hz etc... but I would hold out for 1.2kHz (1200Hz).. lets see if I get that in 2012 in a XBR15.... :)
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I am probably in the Minority, but when I first sa 120Hz on my XBR4, my Jaw dropped. It was so realistic... I thought I could make out the camera movements and all... the isue I had was that on fast moving action, the processor could not generate the frames fast enough, the faster the motion the worse it got but that only happens in 1-2% of the time on a given movie... I figured they'd go up in multiples of 180Hz or 240Hz etc... but I would hold out for 1.2kHz (1200Hz).. lets see if I get that in 2012 in a XBR15.... :)