Apple's 24-inch LED Cinema Display review

Design
Design wise, the new LED Cinema Display isn't a far cry from Apple's prior (er, still current, kind of) line. It's relatively sleek, completely fashionable and 100% Apple. It's simply silver and black, and it meshes well with the motif found on the outfit's latest laptop line. The "cheese grater" grille on the bottom of the screen -- which enables the "2.1" sound system to cut through -- is a nice touch, though you'll probably never look at it after giving it a peek upon the initial unboxing. We've never been a fan of the Cinema Display base, and we're no closer to falling in love now. The inability to adjust it north and south (it simply tilts down and back) is a real pain for us. Sure, you can remove the base entirely and mount it on a VESA-compatible arm, but seriously, who's doing that? In all honesty, the angle is just about right for most, but it's a niggle we can't help but point out.
'Round back, you'll find a large, mirrored Apple logo, a recessed port for the AC adapter and another port that's filled with a tri-prong cable (USB 2.0, MagSafe power and Mini DisplayPort). There's the obligatory Kensington security slot and a trio of USB 2.0 sockets too, but that's sadly where the connectivity options end. No HDMI input, no possibility for a breakout box, nothing. In other words, you can forget about hooking your Xbox 360 up to this thing when it's not handling your desktop activities. Needless to say, we were a bit bummed to see additional video inputs completely omitted, but strangely, not at all surprised.The recline on the base is nice and smooth, and it always held solid whenever we changed its position. Oh, and yeah, it's pretty striking to look at. Just make sure you have a good duster, as the glossy screen pulls dust out of places you never knew existed.
Sound
We generally wouldn't bother with mentioning a monitor's audio qualities specifically, but Apple has clearly given this screen something worthy of talking about. Audio is delivered automatically over USB 2.0 from one's laptop to the screen, and while we can only chuckle at the ".1" part of the "2.1" audio system, the quality is darn impressive. When hooking up your notebook, audio is instantly ported from the lappie's speakers to the monitor's speakers when the USB connector of the tri-prong cable is hooked up, and the clarity is superb. It gets plenty loud for desk use, and it does a noteworthy job of dispersing sound in a way that envelopes the user. In other words, it actually sounds like stereo, not just a puny tweeter doing its best to crank out full-range monaural sound.
Visuals
So, the $64,000 question -- does the thing even look good? In a word, yes. In a couple of words, absolutely yes. The LED backlight is responsible for delivering a striking, bright and incredibly crisp image that looks good while playing back fast-moving action or just displaying your mundane desktop. It's actually rather scary how bright this thing gets, so don't worry about being able to see it in broad daylight. Those familiar with the display on the new MacBook Pro are fully equipped to understand the LED Cinema Display, as the qualities between the two are practically identical. Whites are starkly white, blacks are decidedly deep and overall, it's just enjoyable to look at. Visually, we really don't have any complaints worth harping on.
Now, about that glossy coating. We mentioned that it's bright enough for use in an office surrounded by open windows, but sadly, you'll see every decoration in said office just as frequently (via reflections) as your see your applications. Particularly in bright light, the glossy coating doubles as a mirror, and while you can certainly look through and adjust your eyes to tone it out, it's a quality that's distinctive enough to make mention of. In fact, if you're not already comfortable with working on highly glossy displays, we wouldn't buy this one without a trip to the Apple Store to see it for yourself. Sure, the colors certainly "pop" more thanks to the glossy panel, but we still prefer matte when it comes down to it. Again, this is completely subjective -- you owe it to yourself to check it out and see if it's a bother.
On a related note, the viewing angles on this monitor were nothing short of terrific. We could see everything on the screen from practically every angle that you'd ever find yourself at, and we had no complaints from a small group that we rounded up to watch a 1080p movie trailer.
Usability
Apple makes no bones about the fact that this monitor was built with MacBook / MacBook Pro / MacBook Air owners in mind. It's a notebook owner's display, if you will. We didn't fully appreciate the convenience of an included MagSafe power adapter until we began moving from one floor to another. Not having to unplug and tote your AC adapter with you when moving to "desktop mode" is a really, really nice touch. You simply plug the monitor into the wall, connect the MagSafe / USB 2.0 / Mini DisplayPort adapter to your unibody MacBook (or Pro / Air), and you're ready to go. You can even connect it with the lid closed and operate in "lid closed" mode should you choose. Everything was extremely snappy in terms of connecting / disconnecting from the display; our MacBook Pro immediately adjusted to its new friend when the tri-prong cable was all hooked up, and it didn't lag up when things were suddenly unplugged on a whim.
Wrap-up
The 24-inch LED Cinema Display is a well thought-out product. It's the first display that isn't ashamed to be built for notebook owners, and the simple inclusions that make it unique are incredibly handy and entirely useful. A built-in power adapter (MagSafe) and integrated speakers that don't sound horrendous are two features we quickly learned to appreciate, and the visuals weren't too shabby, either. That said, we've got plenty of beef with this thing. The move to Mini DisplayPort is fine, but charging $29 for a Mini DisplayPort to DVI (or VGA, as a separate adapter) is kind of ludicrous. Leave it to Apple to equip its new display with a single output format; if you want to use any port that's been remotely popular in the past few years, you'll be coughing up some extra -- a lot extra if springing for the $99 Mini DisplayPort to dual-link DVI adapter.
Also, why not provide a few auxiliary inputs here? This would be a killer multi-faceted display if it would openly accept HDMI, VGA, component or even S-Video from alternate sources. These days, folks are looking for utility in the devices they buy, and we're not so sure a one-trick-pony display is going to be all that compelling when there are literally dozens of similarly sized alternatives that welcome standalone game consoles, DVD players and cameras / camcorders. Don't get us wrong, this device is exceptional at being a computer monitor, and the price isn't at all absurd given its size and LED backlight, but we're still left yearning for a tiny bit more in the connectivity department.
Our bottom line? Apple's 24-inch LED Cinema Display is a winner, but it's a winner with reservations. If you're totally kosher with Mini DisplayPort, and you don't mind the omission of additional inputs, and you're confident the glossy panel won't turn you off, you'll be hard pressed to find a better LED-backlit screen at this size and at this price point -- particularly if you're a MacBook / MBP / MBA owner.
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Cheddar @ Dec 15th 2008 11:57AM
Thing of beauty!! Have seen these in person, they are outstanding!
zioncat @ Dec 15th 2008 12:07PM
I must admit that this display is a beauty but for a thousand dollars after tax is it really worth the time of day.
Tom @ Dec 15th 2008 12:40PM
I've never met a person who enjoys mile-wide bezels before.... Seriously, that bezel is *at least* as wide as my Samsung 243T's bezel... and that thing is one of the first 24" monitors EVER. I don't think it looks good at all, and the stand is *yawn* uninspired - taking designs from old (same thing the towers, macbooks, ipod classics, etc have been doing - no risks whatsoever in the past 5 years or so from a company heralded as a great design firm).
And the removal of DVI (seriously, what video card doesn't have it) makes it even uglier. I counter your claims of beauty with arguments of bland, tired design and outrageous stupidity.
Stin @ Dec 15th 2008 1:19PM
You can get a 42" Panasonic 1080p plasma for less than this. No thanks Apple.
Tom @ Dec 15th 2008 1:31PM
Yes, it's beautiful. But, I just can't imagine spending that much for a 24" Monitor. I've been following 24-28" displays pretty closely lately and just picked up a 24" HP LCD (recertified) for $199.99 from a deal I found on TechDealDigger. The display is beautiful and has better connectivity than the Apple display. For the price of the Apple, I could buy 4 of these!
http://www.techdealdigger.com/deals/hewlett-packard-w2408h-199-at-buycom/5628
daniel @ Dec 15th 2008 2:00PM
Can someone take a pic of the screen next to an iMac to see how visually they look next to each other? It would important to see, since most iMac users might buy it for the aesthetic look of having dual monitor setup that is so space saving and nice to look at?
Phil @ Dec 15th 2008 1:55PM
Yes, you can get a $199 TN panel from HP, or get this instead which is an LED backlight (i.e., no more CCFL fading) IPS panel. This panel can display 16.7 million colours, that HP TN can display 255,000 as it's only 6 bit. The viewing angles on this will be fantastic (IPS has the best viewing angles), that HP TN will be bad the minute you move your head off centre.
When will people start realising that there are different quality (and technology) panels used in these things and they are priced accordingly.
The closest to this would be the HP LP2475W which is also H-IPS based and that costs around $500-600
icfleming @ Dec 15th 2008 3:46PM
@Phil
I guess I should get the HP then to match the crappy 6-bit LCD Apple put in my Macbook in 2007.
TREX6662k5 @ Dec 15th 2008 3:59PM
@Phil
People will realize once people notice a difference.
Chizzed @ Dec 15th 2008 4:12PM
Oh I love Engadget so much...but really..."Flaw, bright colors, flaw, expensive, flaw. But we still love you because you're an Apple product."
Don Goyo @ Dec 15th 2008 4:15PM
Re: "You can get a 42" Panasonic 1080p plasma for less than this. No thanks Apple."
A 42" "monitor" with 1920x1080 resolution... (How big do you want those pixels?) No thanks Stin.
Dave @ Dec 15th 2008 5:48PM
I like the display, but just recently Dell has been having sales on some of their monitors with basically the same feature-set as this one. The kicker is that those monitors were around the $300 mark (or even a few bucks less).
As nice as the monitor is, I have to ask myself if the ease of integration with an existing Apple notebook is worth $500. And, quite frankly, the answer is no. Not even close.
Hotrod @ Dec 15th 2008 6:55PM
I agree Cheddar, this is nicest monitor I have ever laid eyes on. It makes my Aluminum iMac look old, ugly, and fat.
Boards of Canada @ Dec 15th 2008 7:32PM
come on... it look like any pc screen now its black... you guys suck big time.
loosely_coupled @ Dec 15th 2008 11:58PM
Sorry for hijacking, but Engadget screwed up big time and I have to get this information out.
****************** ATTENTION ANYONE PLANNING TO BUY THIS DISPLAY *************
ENGADGET'S INFORMATION IS WRONG. THERE IS NO ADAPTER THAT ALLOWS THIS MONITOR TO WORK WITH A DVI OR HDMI COMPUTER! -- REPEAT -- THIS MONITOR IS **ONLY** COMPATIBLE WITH APPLE'S NEW LAPTOPS OR OTHER COMPUTER WITH NATIVE MINI-DISPLAYPORT OUTPUT.
****************** ATTENTION ANYONE PLANNING TO BUY THIS DISPLAY *************
The "mini-displayport -> dual-DVI" Adapter that is referenced in the post ONLY works for connecting a mini-displayport output on a computer to a DVI input on a monitor, *NOT* the reverse. It cannot be used to connect a DVI output on a computer to the mini-displayport input on the LED Cinema display.
Stin @ Dec 16th 2008 11:36AM
"A 42" "monitor" with 1920x1080 resolution... (How big do you want those pixels?) No thanks Stin."
What are you talking about? I'm surfing the web right now on a 50" 1080p plasma and it looks AWESOME.
Adderz @ Dec 15th 2008 12:00PM
Does Engadget do its own in depth reviews on other LCD's and notebooks, or just Apples?
I have seen Blackberry etc reviews, but the only computer and LCD reviews i remember are on Apple products....seems a bit....i wont say it...
Saad Rabia @ Dec 15th 2008 12:06PM
Mate, this is how it has been on Engadget since 4 years ago.
Many people offered them to write reviews about other products, then post it on Engadget, but it seems like if Apple is giving them something special, something to play with at night, in a hotel room, of course I'm talking about free Apple products.
kal326 @ Dec 15th 2008 12:12PM
Well they can't be on everybodies payroll, that would be just a little too obvious. Just imaging if they had a review link at the top of the page about the latest Dell XPS computer or Nokia phone for weeks. Or had 70 posts including preview, launch, and follow up including screen shots and paragraph upon paragraph of every new netbook that launched. Hell if that were the case we would still be reading about the first Eee PC or two.
Dopefish @ Dec 15th 2008 12:13PM
They wouldn't do it if it didn't pull in the numbers...
Samurai Jack @ Dec 15th 2008 12:16PM
Maybe it's because your daft or a noob? Engadget has done reviews of countless Dell monitors, almost every significant netbook, notebooks galore, HP all-in-ones, you name it. This so called "Apple bias" you petty whingers like to attribute to Engadget just doesn't exist. Now STFU.
Oleg Prosalov @ Dec 15th 2008 12:24PM
...racist
myro255 @ Dec 15th 2008 12:54PM
or maybe because engadget is owned by AOL, which is a huge apple supporter?
nerdtalker @ Dec 15th 2008 2:34PM
Clearly, the only products worth spending any time on reviewing here are apple's. This *is* engadget, of course.
Other 24" LED monitors? They don't exist. They aren't good enough. They aren't apple. *bah* /scorns
Tyler Willis @ Dec 15th 2008 3:14PM
To be fair, this is substantially different than your run of the mill monitor.
How many other monitors on the market today will power your notebook, run on display port (exclusively) have a LED panel, and are glossy to a fault. Not saying its good or bad, just that I for one am curious about it (I won't be buying one b\c I don't have a displayport capable PC.
This monitor is more of an extension of the new mac-books than a typical commoditized display. It is worthy of some additional attention.
Brad @ Dec 15th 2008 4:15PM
How many other monitors on the market today will power your notebook:
This won't power my notebook.
Run on display port (exclusively)
None...wonder why?
have a LED panel
Hmm. A quick Google found about a half-dozen in this size. Where are those reviews? I like the Samsung one, for example.
and are glossy to a fault
A few.
-------
The point isn't that we DON'T want to see this review. It's that of ALL the monitors that are out in this quality / size / technology, how come this is the ONLY one they've reviewed, and they've devoted at least 4 or 5 stories to it? Therein lies the bias.
Hung @ Dec 15th 2008 6:04PM
Perhaps y'all don't understand how the review process works.
(1) The reviewer sends a request to the company that sells the product.
(2) The company decides whether or not to honor the request. They consider the reviewer's bias, scope of knowledge regarding the technology, the audience of the review, and how far along the product is developed.
(3) If the company decides to lend the reviewer said product, then—and only then—the reviewer may enact his or her review.
Anandtech or Head-fi (well, the admins of Head-fi, at least) usually get their way, but this is how I imagine Engadget gets treated.
"Hi Toshiba/Ultimate Ears/Apple? This is Johnny APPLEseed from Engadget. May we borrow your product to review it for our website?"
•Toshiba: We are unsure how impartially you will review our laptops
•UE: Do you guys even have an audio engineer on staff?
•Apple: LOLOLOL, ENGADGET? OF COURSE YOU CAN REVIEW OUR PRODUCT, OL' BUDDY, OL' PAL! HOW MANY DOZEN DO YOU NEED? YOU CAN RETURN THEM AT ANY TIME!
Jason White @ Dec 17th 2008 9:28PM
I've seem many, many intros on Dell and HP monitors but at the $900 (-tax) price point, this one deserves a review. Although Dell and HP seem to be the cheaper choice, Apple always has the better panels (no offense to non-apple fanbois).
Derrick @ Dec 15th 2008 12:02PM
apple can take this display and shove it up their ass
Eric @ Dec 15th 2008 12:15PM
Counseling is an option in many communities for people with anger issues. Give it a try.
Mam00th @ Dec 15th 2008 1:07PM
Well they must have a one-of-a-kind huge ass if they can do that
Darren @ Dec 15th 2008 12:31PM
Ha Ha Ha! You're pathetic.
Francesco @ Dec 15th 2008 1:05PM
I agree with Derrick actually... though he could have expanded a bit. This monitor is COMPLETELY UNUSABLE for any photographer, retoucher, or design professional. Why does apple keep insisting on using that blasted high-gloss over all of their monitors? It makes the contrast so ridiculously high to the point that it can not be matched to any output device! Not to mention that it creates colors (in dark skin tones for instance) on screen that are not really there... so you could be sitting there retouching out something that doesn't even exist, thus wasting your time as a professional; which is what this monitor is... a waste of time to any professionals (that's right -- those same pros that made apple what it is, by swearing by it's quality and it's at one time loyalty to it's customers). Oh and lets not forget about the fact that if this is anything l ike those HORRID i-mac glossy screens, if you change your vertical angle of view even slightly, the color completely shits into who knows what where all highlights become yellow murky messes. Bad Apple, BAD! Good Derrick, Good!
RyanTV @ Dec 15th 2008 1:34PM
At least that would give it one more connectivity option :)
protozoider @ Dec 15th 2008 3:03PM
Agreed. So you pay $899 for a nice big photo frame. It still has horrible response time and still lacks a high contrast ratio found in other brands. Also, its usability is basically limited to your mac products and nothing else by what they said about the connections. Sounds like a huge waste when you could get 2 high end Samsung 24" monitors with HDMI inputs, HDCP, a much higher contrast ratio, and 5ms response time.
phill @ Dec 18th 2008 2:44PM
This is way too expensive, I know it is LED and all, but I can deal with that 24" HP display, pocket the difference, and upgrade in 6-12 months when HP and everyone else has the same technology in their 24" screens (plus, all the normal list of connections)
phill
Torrent-tatty@live.com @ Dec 15th 2008 12:02PM
sexy.
Sam Stone @ Dec 15th 2008 1:44PM
Please say thats not your email address as your Username?
AnyKey @ Dec 15th 2008 2:03PM
I'd so tap that thing.
Mic2000 @ Dec 15th 2008 2:24PM
He propably mistaken de username textbox with the email textbox while registering
The Sonic God @ Dec 15th 2008 12:02PM
I simply can't justify a monitor like this. Still with the old 14ms response time, and the ridiculous $900 price tag, and even the obscure Mini DisplayPort adapter makes me so confused.
I sell Apple products for a living, and I don't really think I'm going to be able to sell these. Curiously enough, a lot of people are asking for them.
Oh, and I really despise glossy screens. I work 90 hours a week, and most of that is behind a computer screen. A shiny surface monitor is just something I could not get used to.
aceley @ Dec 15th 2008 1:04PM
90 hours a week..... with apple products? 0_o
you must be steve jobs PA
Lowest Ranked @ Dec 15th 2008 12:09PM
Personal ASSistant.
Ray @ Dec 15th 2008 12:10PM
90 hours a week? Hmmm. I doubt that. Really.
joe23521 @ Dec 15th 2008 12:42PM
Maybe time for a new gig?
billy bob thorton @ Dec 15th 2008 1:04PM
90 hrs a week is possible but stupid. I did it for a while when I had absolutely no life and was fresh out of a relationship. But in all honesty no one actually works those entire hours. I worked like a slave but still probably laid back for 15% of the time. Besides since he has time to post here proves that he's not actually working those 90 hrs, logs 90 hrs maybe.
loocas @ Dec 15th 2008 1:28PM
To some, a week doesn't only have 5 days guys... please, consider that.
As for the photo above (the iBook and iMonitor) instantly invoked a question in my mind: "what a terrible waste of money".
Chris Dunning @ Dec 15th 2008 3:03PM
@loocas
That's not a question. Perhaps you meant, "Why the terrible waste of money?"
balls @ Dec 15th 2008 3:18PM
90 Hours a Week working with Apple = RDF ALERT!
Cory @ Dec 15th 2008 12:04PM
Of course it's worth it, this is engadget! For 95% of people, this monitor would provide almost no advantages over a normal 24 inch widescreen monitor. How many people need absolutely perfect colors? And those who do most likely wouldn't a glossy display. There's so many questions about this monitor and you guys didn't really address many of the problems.