Also, is it just me or does anyone else feel that when Engadget wants to fix a word in their articles, they first setup a meeting, discuss the issue for a couple of hours, create a poll in between them, then chose one of them to go in to the quest of changing that simple mistake?
Not only that, but the mistakes are pretty frequent. Engadget writers should re-read their articles before posting, or get another writer to read them over.
Just think of the damage it would do to Toshiba's stock price if an error like this was uncorrected. Engadget could be responsible for a japanese government bailout.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Perhaps you may want to reconsider writing "half-gig" as it has exceeded that many times over.
Yea is it just me or does it hurt your brain to read that... Atleast I'll only see the post once.
Also, is it just me or does anyone else feel that when Engadget wants to fix a word in their articles, they first setup a meeting, discuss the issue for a couple of hours, create a poll in between them, then chose one of them to go in to the quest of changing that simple mistake?
maybe they count the reader comments concerning and when they reach a certain number, they fix the mistake?
Not only that, but the mistakes are pretty frequent. Engadget writers should re-read their articles before posting, or get another writer to read them over.
Just think of the damage it would do to Toshiba's stock price if an error like this was uncorrected. Engadget could be responsible for a japanese government bailout.
Half a gig?
Man, I'm going to party like it's 1999.