How come he doesn't decrease linearly with size? I mean I would expect him to be only one-quarter as good or even one-eighth at that small resolution and that low frame rate.... Then we should also consider synergy; do the two different performance hits work together to make the experience especially bad?
If not, then that Bale guy would do himself a favor by doing some asymptotic shrinking toward zero...
"I'm moving to a small studio and for some reason the cable connection is in an awkward place and I need a way to transmit HD quality video and audio no more than 20 feet away. What is the best wireless HDMI transmitter / receiver for this situation? Thanks!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
How come he doesn't decrease linearly with size? I mean I would expect him to be only one-quarter as good or even one-eighth at that small resolution and that low frame rate.... Then we should also consider synergy; do the two different performance hits work together to make the experience especially bad?
If not, then that Bale guy would do himself a favor by doing some asymptotic shrinking toward zero...