Another way to look at it, this sensor is about half as big as some of the new Canon camcorders, which means Canon will continue to dominate in image quality and low-light performance.
Errr... the camcorders that have double the CMOS size from Canon also have more than double the pixel density, meaning low-light will not necessarily be better. They are also probably a lot more expensive.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
2.2mp sensor, thats rubbish! Canon's new low end cameras are over 3mp and the highend is 8.6mp.
Dude, this is a camcorder, not a camera.
He's actually talking about their new HD camcorders. Look a few posts back.
Another way to look at it, this sensor is about half as big as some of the new Canon camcorders, which means Canon will continue to dominate in image quality and low-light performance.
Errr... the camcorders that have double the CMOS size from Canon also have more than double the pixel density, meaning low-light will not necessarily be better. They are also probably a lot more expensive.