Man, you nailed that headline. Seriously, an iPhone nano is not going to happen anytime soon. Apple sells millions of full-sized iPhones and no one seems to complain. And it sells them for $200 out of the store, which would mean an imaginary nano must cost half that, and that would just destroy Apple's business plan(on top of being just a plainly dumb move). I'm sure Apples gunning for a more significant market share, but thats not the way to gain it.
Plus, iPhone as a brand is stronger than other any product in history (including Apple's own Mac and iPod), and Apple are not going to fuck it up by splitting the product line before the platform evolves.
And even if I am wrong, there is no way in hell they're calling it a nano.
Yeah, I agree, but the iPhone have some problems to get in some markets - in China it doesn't go without 3G working for example? And a full feature iPhone cost a leg in Latin America, since it's just sold with the most expensive 3G access plans. A "normal" iPhone, just for calls and apps, with ocasional edge/wap use would be great here.
A Nano would make sense if it's directed to specific markets - but it doesn't look like Apple, so it's unlikely.
there are allot of people that think the iPhone is too big. they will solve the smaller screen easily with a higher res screen my money is on the iPhone Nano rumors being true.
For those looking for a device strictly for reading, the new Kobo is a nice little option. It's small enough to slip into a pocket, can do more with a PDF than the competition, and at $129, it's $10 cheaper than both the Nook and Kindle WiFi.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Man, you nailed that headline.
Seriously, an iPhone nano is not going to happen anytime soon. Apple sells millions of full-sized iPhones and no one seems to complain. And it sells them for $200 out of the store, which would mean an imaginary nano must cost half that, and that would just destroy Apple's business plan(on top of being just a plainly dumb move). I'm sure Apples gunning for a more significant market share, but thats not the way to gain it.
Plus, iPhone as a brand is stronger than other any product in history (including Apple's own Mac and iPod), and Apple are not going to fuck it up by splitting the product line before the platform evolves.
And even if I am wrong, there is no way in hell they're calling it a nano.
Yeah, I agree, but the iPhone have some problems to get in some markets - in China it doesn't go without 3G working for example? And a full feature iPhone cost a leg in Latin America, since it's just sold with the most expensive 3G access plans. A "normal" iPhone, just for calls and apps, with ocasional edge/wap use would be great here.
A Nano would make sense if it's directed to specific markets - but it doesn't look like Apple, so it's unlikely.
there are allot of people that think the iPhone is too big.
they will solve the smaller screen easily with a higher res screen
my money is on the iPhone Nano rumors being true.
A higher res on a smaller screen? That makes it even harder to see!