Windows 7 Beta in-depth impressions
We've covered a few tidbits of what the Windows 7 Beta has to offer, including the mess of machines we've installed it on, but we finally gathered together all our thoughts and impressions of the OS into one meaty pile of words and screencaps. Naturally, we're working with a beta here, so things can absolutely get better (or worse), and Redmond might be hiding a feature or two in the wings -- or for the inevitable SP1 -- but we'd say Microsoft has really put its best foot forward here. Check out all our ramblings after the break.
Note: all testing was performed by a real live human blogger, running clean installs of Windows 7 Beta (build 7000) natively on a years old Dell Dimensions 9150 and a brand new Vaio P.

It's fast, painless, and usually complication free -- what more could we ask? More here.
Speed improvements
This seems to be the thing people most wanted out of Windows 7, and it certainly seems to deliver. We'd say the benefits are most drastic in seriously underpowered hardware, like netbooks -- which is, of course, exactly where it's most needed. Our Vaio P, for instance, booted in two thirds the time it took with Vista. Naturally, the OS is by no means delay free. We bump into slowdowns all the time, with all sorts of apps, but they seem to happen less often, and Microsoft has done the work of mitigating the traditional "hurry up and wait" aspect of booting up the computer -- if you can see the desktop, you aren't far from making something happen, instead of waiting for 100,000 start-up items to do their thing. We would like to point out that most folks installing Windows 7 might be looking at their first clean install in a while, and the OS is definitely not immune to slow downs as more stuff is installed and more things are going on -- as we type this we're trying to sync a Zune and watching the rest of the OS grind to a halt in the process. Speed gains aren't just at the surface level, either. File transfer times have been improved, especially with SSD.
Stability
It's a beta, so we won't harp on this. We've had a few BSoDs, and a couple of failed installations that we feared would "brick" our computer, but ended up failing gracefully. Overall, a pretty tame experience for a beta, but Windows 7 definitely isn't bug free.
New Taskbar

Ooh, this is a tricky one. We'd say it's most likely going to boil down to a debate between power users and the casual types. It does introduce a certain amount of interface inconsistency to the OS, with non-active applications taking up the same amount of space and sitting right next to running applications, and it means you're an extra click away from switching windows within an app in certain scenarios -- extra windows are buried in a pop-up menu, though you can turn off this functionality. Also, Microsoft has made the odd move of removing any apps that you "pin" as a permanent icon to the taskbar from the frequent items section of the Start Menu -- which will no doubt prove frustrating for people expecting to see their frequented apps in that familiar place.

Certain apps also have "jump lists" that can be accessed by right clicking on the icon, bringing up recent documents, frequent tasks and the like. This kills two birds with one stone, allowing for easier access to more tasks right where they're relevant, and killing off some of the myriad of icons that tend to populate the system tray. Unfortunately, we'll have to wait for developers to catch on -- most of Microsoft's own apps don't even support this functionality yet.

Further cleaning up the system tray is an "Action Center" for listing various nagging warnings -- instead of closing them out and forgetting about them, you just leave them in the Action Center and forget about them.
Peek

Gimmicky? Sure. But it's not everyday that a little gimmick like Peek -- activated by hovering over a button on the bottom right hand corner of the screen, turning all open windows into just their borders -- gives new life to the frequent task of finding the desktop and hunting for windows.

Peek is also activated when you click on an item in the Taskbar with multiple windows open. A pop-up shows large thumbnails of each item, and when you hover over it all windows -- below and above it -- disappear into their borders. Perfect for finding that misplaced dialog box.
Windows Explorer

Microsoft has reworked some things here, reorganized some others, and made sure to put frequent and relevant tasks in an easy to find spot across the top. We won't get into all of it, but overall we'd say things are more intuitive and "pretty."
Windows Media Center
Microsoft hasn't done a ton here, mainly a new, easier setup method and some interface enhancements -- borrowing a bit from Zune in the now playing section. Engadget HD will be looking into this a bit more deeply, so stay tuned.
Window management

They really went overboard on this one, and we're loving it. There are bunches of ways to find, sort and place windows now, some of which include:
Gadgets run free

Microsoft axed that constricting sidebar, now allowing Gadgets to litter the desktop however you choose -- another good excuse for Peek. Unfortunately, some gadgets seem to chafe at this -- we'll have to wait for updates to many of them before they start to look "right" sans sidebar.
Networking

Microsoft's done a lot of work here, and it really shows. They might not be to the point of "it just works" yet, but the HomeGroups functionality actually allows mere mortals, using no magic tricks or slight of hand, to set up their own home network, and merge existing networks -- and actually find and share media, printers and documents! It's a crazy concept, we know, and won't get into all the technicalities -- through a string of bad luck or some broken functionality, it didn't "just work" on our first few tries -- but we were able to go through Microsoft's simple hand-holding process from enough different angles and do-overs to get our PCs talking to each other at last.
Multiple display support

Having set up many a projector in our day, we know the incredibly frustrating task that can be at times. Windows 7 makes it easy -- just tap Windows + P and there's a quick selector menu for choosing to extend, duplicate or isolate the screen to your monitor or the projector.

Microsoft has also improved the general display settings, making it easier to detect and arrange multiple monitors.
Play to device

Speaking of talking to each other, one of our favorite new features is the new "play to device" functionality in Windows Media Player. After you set up device sharing -- which is vaguely but not really related to HomeGroup setup -- you can right click on a song or playlist and blast it out of any device you have set up to receive such blasts. That means an Xbox 360, a Media Center Extender, a family member's PC (they obviously have to approve this functionality at the outset), or whatever other devices support this function in the future. You can also stream music and video out of networked collections in the other direction, but that's way less fun.
Brand new Paint

Aww, it's so pretty!

A pretty neat feature, in theory, Microsoft brings device management straight into the OS -- no longer relegated to a sub-menu of some media player or control panel. Unfortunately, it didn't work with any of the myriad of devices we had laying around -- including the Zune, Samsung's super-basic YP-S2 mass storage player, a PowerShot SD1000 or the very D90 (pictured) that Ballmer has demoed this feature with. If Microsoft won't even drink the Kool-Aid with the Zune, or at least build in default support for mass storage devices and generic cameras, it's hard to see this catching on, but we're sure there will be more happening here at launch. There's a compatibility list here.
Multitouch
We're working on tracking down some gear to give Windows 7 multitouch capabilities the real once over it deserves. Stay tuned! In the meantime, check out this video of multitouch Virtual Earth 3D running on Windows 7 and a HP TouchSmart.

Sure, this is an incredibly subjective topic, but bear with us. You know that new Peek feature? Well, guess which one single app didn't show its border when we activated Peek: Zune. Sure, it's one of the best looking apps on our whole computer, but it's also incredibly at odds with the majority of our computing experience, and took us a week or so to master back in the day. If Microsoft can't latch onto some sort of consistent usability and interface paradigms, not to mention basic software development guidelines, how can we expect anyone else to? The "sameness" of software on the Mac side might be frustrating, but we'd say the frustration of re-learning how to operate nearly every single application on the Windows side greatly exceeds that. Also, we need some better Twitter apps.
WinFS
We keep making fun little baby steps in this direction -- for instance, the universal search features now built into the operating system makes it much easier and faster find that one particular file, app or function we were looking for -- but we still want the incredible power and promise of WinFS. It's clearly not happening this generation, but that doesn't mean we can't complain about it.
A unified vision
Overall, we get a certain vibe from Windows 7 -- and most Windows releases -- that there are too many cooks in the kitchen. There are too many ways to do the same or similar things, like set up a network, or play music. Sure, it's getting easier to accomplish those tasks, there's the new HomeGroup functionality, a myriad of setup wizards, and the ever-present and intimidating "advanced" setup modes; or the choice between Zune, Windows Media Player and Windows Media Center. Or if you're failing to accomplish something, the OS is all-too-ready to send you to a help page, but you don't get the idea that these groups really talk to each other. They might be "linked" together, but they're not "unified" in purpose. There have been plenty of times when we just had no idea where to begin a task, from the seeming endless options on the left side of the control panel, or when the OS forgot about helping us do the task, and just gave us a link to a help section instead -- even if a wizard would've been the more appropriate way to go. There's no simple solution to all of this, but the older and bigger Windows gets, the more obfuscated certain tasks become -- and that's not a fun trend.
Overall, Windows 7 is a very good Windows release, and that's going to be plenty for most folks -- but we just wonder how many generations we are away from Microsoft really gutting this OS and finding newer, better paradigms than, say, "windows" and "double click" for interfacing with a desktop computer. Multitouch is certainly part of it, but we're pining for the future, and nobody's delivering it just yet.
Note: all testing was performed by a real live human blogger, running clean installs of Windows 7 Beta (build 7000) natively on a years old Dell Dimensions 9150 and a brand new Vaio P.
What we love
Installation
Speed improvements
This seems to be the thing people most wanted out of Windows 7, and it certainly seems to deliver. We'd say the benefits are most drastic in seriously underpowered hardware, like netbooks -- which is, of course, exactly where it's most needed. Our Vaio P, for instance, booted in two thirds the time it took with Vista. Naturally, the OS is by no means delay free. We bump into slowdowns all the time, with all sorts of apps, but they seem to happen less often, and Microsoft has done the work of mitigating the traditional "hurry up and wait" aspect of booting up the computer -- if you can see the desktop, you aren't far from making something happen, instead of waiting for 100,000 start-up items to do their thing. We would like to point out that most folks installing Windows 7 might be looking at their first clean install in a while, and the OS is definitely not immune to slow downs as more stuff is installed and more things are going on -- as we type this we're trying to sync a Zune and watching the rest of the OS grind to a halt in the process. Speed gains aren't just at the surface level, either. File transfer times have been improved, especially with SSD.
Stability
It's a beta, so we won't harp on this. We've had a few BSoDs, and a couple of failed installations that we feared would "brick" our computer, but ended up failing gracefully. Overall, a pretty tame experience for a beta, but Windows 7 definitely isn't bug free.
New Taskbar



Peek


Windows Explorer

Windows Media Center
Microsoft hasn't done a ton here, mainly a new, easier setup method and some interface enhancements -- borrowing a bit from Zune in the now playing section. Engadget HD will be looking into this a bit more deeply, so stay tuned.
Window management

- Shake: grab the title bar and shake vigorously to minimize all other windows.
- Maximize at top (pictured): drag the title bar to the top of the screen and Windows 7 will try and grab it and maximize it if you let it go in the right spot.
- Pop to the left, pop to the right: Windows + Left or Right arrow key to maximize the window to that half of the screen.
Gadgets run free

Networking

Multiple display support


Play to device

Brand new Paint

What we're looking forward to
Device Stage
Multitouch
We're working on tracking down some gear to give Windows 7 multitouch capabilities the real once over it deserves. Stay tuned! In the meantime, check out this video of multitouch Virtual Earth 3D running on Windows 7 and a HP TouchSmart.
What it still needs
Good software
WinFS
We keep making fun little baby steps in this direction -- for instance, the universal search features now built into the operating system makes it much easier and faster find that one particular file, app or function we were looking for -- but we still want the incredible power and promise of WinFS. It's clearly not happening this generation, but that doesn't mean we can't complain about it.
A unified vision
Overall, we get a certain vibe from Windows 7 -- and most Windows releases -- that there are too many cooks in the kitchen. There are too many ways to do the same or similar things, like set up a network, or play music. Sure, it's getting easier to accomplish those tasks, there's the new HomeGroup functionality, a myriad of setup wizards, and the ever-present and intimidating "advanced" setup modes; or the choice between Zune, Windows Media Player and Windows Media Center. Or if you're failing to accomplish something, the OS is all-too-ready to send you to a help page, but you don't get the idea that these groups really talk to each other. They might be "linked" together, but they're not "unified" in purpose. There have been plenty of times when we just had no idea where to begin a task, from the seeming endless options on the left side of the control panel, or when the OS forgot about helping us do the task, and just gave us a link to a help section instead -- even if a wizard would've been the more appropriate way to go. There's no simple solution to all of this, but the older and bigger Windows gets, the more obfuscated certain tasks become -- and that's not a fun trend.
What we hope we never see
Three hundred different overpriced versions of Windows 7. We know that Microsoft sells its operating system to a lot of different people, and we're aware that some people only need the stuff that's in Vista Basic, while other people Media Center and motion-filled desktop backgrounds, but please, for the love of Bill Gates, don't hit us with Windows 7 Home / Basic / Business / Ultimate / Whatever. Build a smart installer and figure out how to put the right components on the right computers, but stick the OS in one box and sell it for one price. If you have to sell some crazy enterprise thing at an extra cost, so be it, but stop confusing consumers and stop overcharging -- pick a low, flat rate and stick to it.Wrap-up
We're not sure we necessarily agree with folks who say that Windows 7 is the "Vista that should have been." There are certainly plenty of improvements here that Vista could have benefitted from, and Vista very well might've been released undercooked, but Vista was what it was, and Microsoft has clearly moved on, with new features, a newly refined kernel and a new aim of supporting a wider swath of hardware. And yet, in many other ways, Windows 7 shows where Microsoft's industry dominating OS has hardly changed from its Windows NT heritage -- it doesn't take very many clicks to find the ugly underpinnings of the OS, aspects like the "true" device manager that have hardly received an aesthetic upgrade, not to mention a functionality upgrade, in the past decade.Overall, Windows 7 is a very good Windows release, and that's going to be plenty for most folks -- but we just wonder how many generations we are away from Microsoft really gutting this OS and finding newer, better paradigms than, say, "windows" and "double click" for interfacing with a desktop computer. Multitouch is certainly part of it, but we're pining for the future, and nobody's delivering it just yet.



























I'm buying Windows 7 when it comes out!
Which one? The very Basic? Or maybe Home? Or Business? No, you surely want Ultimate for the best experience! No? Oh, wait, I know, Enterprise!
I don't care how many editions there will be, but please, MS, put 64-bit install disk in every box, not only with Ultimate.
I will also be torrenting it when it comes out
Nah I'm gonna buy Windows 7: Recession Edition. Hopefully it'll be the cheapest one :P
Enterprise is only purchasable through various volume licensing schemes.
Hunter: that would be called PIRATING and it would be a smart choice.
ENGADGET:
You've gotten this wrong a couple times, just wanted to bring it to your attention again (sending you an email too):
GADGETS CAN BE PUT ANYWHERE IN VISTA, TOO.
They don't have to be locked to the sidebar:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3501/3221437032_28eb72cdf7_b.jpg
When the sidebar is open:
1) Click and drag the gadgets to the desktop
2) Right click on the sidebar and click "close sidebar"
The gadgets will remain on the desktop and the docking bar will disappear.
Please correct your information! Hope this helps fellow vista users!
This may be the last version of Windows someone would buy. The operating environment is becoming so commoditized and web based. But of course Microsoft wants to preserve the idea of the operating environment being a special product (Vista Ultimate!), and will resist including internet based enhancements (why are there no chats, discussions, collaborative documents for support and development integrated in the OS?)
No Innovation?
Microsoft has Xbox Live. Everybody now has achievements, arcades and movie downloads. Steam is like a bad carbon copy.
Microsoft had touchscreen phones with apps for over a decade. It was mostly crappy because it was based on a decade old platform but the idea of a 'smart phone' wasn't Apple's (or Microsoft's but they certainly were on the forefront).
AppleTV? Bad Windows Media Center extender.
Desktop Search? That was in Vista public demos LONG before OS X had it.
Windows 1 had a dock/taskbar.
Tablet PCs anybody?
Netbooks are the Origami idea without a touchscreen.
I like the Ribbon in Office 2007. Office 2007 is still by far the most feature complete productivity suite.
Smart Displays were cool but too expensive.
Time Machine is pretty much shadow copy but with animation and on by default.
Windows Home Server?
Sideshow? Underutilized but the concept is really good.
DirectX is head and shoulders above OpenGL.
ZunePass is awesome. $15 a month for unlimited music and 10 free songs to keep. There is no equivalent for the iPod. The iPod can't wifi-sync. Zune had a wireless before the iPod.
"huh"
they do/will...the beginning of it is windows live essentials and office live...the web-linked programs are in beta but will be integrated in W7 along with every other MS software.....check out Live Mesh and Azure
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_Mesh
It'll still be slower than XP. =/
I don't think I'll be getting it right off the bat.
Steam being a carbon copy of XBOX Live? I hope that never happens!
Imagine paying monthly fees for something I don't even particularly like - just to play games online with other people. What an innovation!
Hell...
Imagine Avatars in Steam... just eww.
I hope Microsoft gets smart and either reduces the number of versions or just offer one copy. Since I know they won't do a single all-inclusive release (aka Mac OS X and most Linux distros), these are the only versions they need:
Windows 7 - This is the version you get if you're a consumer, it does everything that Vista Home Premium does. Has both 64-bit and 32-bit discs. This should be priced at $99 for upgrade and $149 for full version.
Windows 7 Business - This is tailored for the business market and won't be on retail shelves.
Windows 7 Ultimate - This is the one you get because you love spending $400 on OS to get Texas Hold 'Em as an extra, it has nothing else beyond the regular Windows 7 release. It does come with a gold chain and has a "I am Rich" desktop theme.
Or they could release just 1 version for $129. :)
@Taylor
Time to upgrade your hardware then.
Gavin, you had me until Steam is a bad carbon copy. Steam was doing it right all along.
Woah woah woah, what? Steam a bad copy of XBL? Since when do I pay for Steam, since when can you buy new releases over XBL, and when did Steam get avatars?!
@ Hashbrown Hunter
There's also Windows 7 Amish Edition :)
Support Microsoft: don't turn to torrents!
@Taylor and XP was slower than 98SE which is slower than DOS. You can't have more features and have it go faster on the same hardware. It's like the computer version of conservation of energy.
good god Sisyphus your desktop is massive. i am very jealous of that huge monitor you must be using.
@chris:
Yes you can get more features and speed while keeping same hardware. Just go Linux. Look:
I have one of those Acer Aspire lounge-oriented boxes (AMD Athlon 64) precharged with MCE2007. Myriads of problems, CPU fan 100% most of the time, BSODs, hangups with the screen plenty of small coloured squares (very ZX Spectrum-esque)...
Now I have the same computer running Linux... and this means:
-Months without rebooting (and only do because I make changes requiring it, not because of OS failures)
-MythTV with 2 USB DTV tuners and a SAT PCI Card. And serving Live TV and the whole video/music/photo to three other Pentium III PCs and a PS3 (using Mediatomb) attached to TVs around the house.
-X10 support via Misterhouse free application controlling over 25 light switches, shade motors, IR presence radio controlles, interface to home burglar alarm system
-Asterisk VoIP for all phones around the house, and connections to my office's asterisk server for cross-calling home-office an mobiles
-Weather station data collection and graph generation, with information exchange with MisterHouse X10 and VoIP (yes, I can call home and hear info about temp in/out, alarm status, can switch on/off heating...
-After buying a 40$ nVidia AGP card, I also have a gorgeous 3D compiz cylindrical desktop with four "sides" (more can be defined) at full 1920x1200 TFT monitor (yes, above FullHD, for video and nice OpenOffice experience) and another 15" TFT at 1024x768 for Amarok (music app) and Evolution (connected to the Exchange Server at office mailbox), one at each side of a double sided virtual desktop screen....
I think I do far more with the same hardware than I could even imagine doing with the MCE back four years ago, don't you agree? And I'm missing some other functionalities for sure!!
PS: The CPU only goes 100% when decoding HD content or performing some heavy (video transcoding, graphics editing in Gimp) tasks. 99% of the time I can't barely hear it.
Laughing @ huh, you must be someone's sister with such understanding of computers, web-based OS.. like hell.
Paint has been improved big time! And the Calculator is awesome. You can resize photos in Paint now, however you are limited to percentages, lets get pixels and inches at proportion and you have me sold!
For (much better) Paint alternatives, try:
Paint.Net (http://www.getpaint.net/) - tons of features
Sumo Paint (http://www.sumo.fi/products/sumopaint/index.php?id=0) - basically an online PhotoShop clone.
And it's been ages since I last used Calculator, as I do everything with Google (http://www.google.com/help/calculator.html), even conversions: currency, degrees, weight, etc.
@giuliop
how did you forget gimp!?
http://gimp.org/
@Daren
It's that when I think Gimp I think Unix. But you're right, of course.
uh, you can resize in the old paint. in the image menu.
GIMP is a horrible alternative to Paint. It is an image manipulation program, not a drawing program. There aren't even shape tools.
A good, simple, open source alternative to Paint would be something like Krita or Tuxpaint.
Well, I am impressed with your review, Paul Miller!
And please, please, please, no Paul Chapel commenting in this topic... ;)
QFT
@paul:
and eight year old OS will always outperform a new one. even os x. the fact the it even rivals xp is great. and as for sli support, it wont be natively supported by any os. you will need drivers for it, but it will work. Its not natively supported on xp and probably wont be
SLI and crossfire is for nvidia and AMD to sort out.
That "benchmarking" was idiotic. The tester ran ADO/MAPI tests on a consumer desktop OS and said that, surprise, the one that doesn't have as much background process work going on is better at balls to the wall performance because your desktop OS isn't made for pushing through the highest possible number of database transactions per second, it's made for running several applications quickly and responsively simultaneously and although this was done poorly in Vista with its memory hogging and overactive processes designed to speed up launching apps, if you'd ever tried 7 you would be hard pressed to find a reason to complain.
And also, the MP3 thing was a bug. That got fixed. Because it's a beta. And that's what you do with a beta. You find bugs. And you fix them. I hope I've broken it down clearly enough for you.
Paul, you really don't understand what they are talking about in regards to SLI do you?
They are putting the onus on the card manufacturer's - just like it is now. SLI will work the same as always, but nVidia and ATI NEED to be, are, and will continue to be responsible for making something they came up with work they way they want it to.
Why the hell should it be something supported natively within the O/S in the first place? Please explain to me in great detail the reason that this would be good, and something you feel you deserve.
Oh, and which O/S is faster, etc is such an unoriginal point that you stick to. Seriously, MS-DOS 3.1 will run a TON faster than any of the Windows will on the same hardware, but guess what - that doesn't make it better or something we should all cling to or start using again.
This idiot (Paul A. Chapel) goes through almost all posts on Engadget and replies to the first or second comment, so that everybody could read him bragging about Apple. Can we ban that idiot?
Wow, that was one wicked BURNNN. Voted down in no time.
Well, I'm not going to argue too much about Windows 7 because I probably won't be buying it. Torrent, yes, buying, no. And as far as the quality of my comments I just don't see how it's okay to criticize Apple and Sony, but not Microsoft.
The people here that praise Microsoft for doing what they should have done years ago are part the problem of why Microsoft has so much trouble innovating. Believe me when I say that if Microsoft had come out with something original, like the iPod or the Playstation or the iPhone, or the Wii, or the Google search engine, I would be praising them, but you see, they didn't. They came out with a bunch of products, (think Zune, think Xbox, think Live Search) only after someone else in the market showed them exactly what to do. They never make a product that's the answer to a problem, it's always a reaction to someone's success.
And then they embarrassed me in my fit of XP fanboyism by falling behind OS X. Seriously, I've ragged on some of my best friends because of this cult of Microsoft. I watched with sullen disbelief as Apple created upgrades ON TIME. I watched as Apple created devices that everyone wanted to copy.
No more. I'll use everything from now on, and if Microsoft can't up their game, I'll become what you call a "switcher."
lol @ John. Well put! :D
He's got a point about the lack of innovation. It does seem like all Microsoft does these days is play catch-up. Although, you could say the Xbox 360 Live service might be an exception.
@ Paul A. Chapel
you know what? microsoft doesnt want you to buy their product. infact they're not even going to sell it to you.. so go torrent your little trojan infected iwork09, and see how osx works out for ya eh?
@ Paul A. Chapel
I can agree that the zune is just a market reaction and it sorta failed, but to be fair so was the iPod except it didn't fail.
The x-box is also a market reaction, and it is doing pretty good but that is because they knew how it should be done, they could support it with software and services, hows the gaming on your flashy new macbooks?
And coincidently that's why the iPod did so good, because it had iTunes.
No one ever just invents something completely new all the time, it's a steady phase of baby steps to evolve it to something better, Microsoft has seemingly hit the mark this time, they did their homework and they will come out on top in the public eye thanks to this.
It's no accident they are getting pretty decent reviews this time around.
Meanwhile the folks at apple are starting to wonder what the f happened, they didn't learn the lesson, they didn't do the work to reduce the threat from viruses, and their system is probably riddled with bugs that no one notices because there are almost no third party drivers running on it.
They now have to start the same process that microsoft did after win me and not just add new shiny graphics to everything.
Nothing apple does is innovation, it's mainly just marketing something that already exists somewhere else that you didn't know about.
Paul,
If you're looking for some multitouch hardware to mess around with Windows 7 on, I'd recommend either a Latitude XT or one of those admittedly awful HP Touchsmart machines.
The Latitudes have been Microsoft's multitouch reference hardware for a while now. Just be aware, the N-Trig drivers that are Windows 7 compatible only work in either pen, or multitouch mode. For some reason, they haven't released ones that do both at the same time yet. It isn't a windows limitation, it's a we-haven't-finished-the-drivers thing. I can't speak to the touchsmart ones, but I've seen virtually every demo on those.
Something nobody has talked about are exactly those features, especially for tablets. I ran windows 7 on my Latitude for a while and was very impressed. They've clearly taken a lot of time to think about the tablet functionality this time around, and nice things like persistent glowy on-screen keyboard presses, auto-transparency of the tablet input panel, as well as the inclusion of a math input panel (which is absolutely mindblowing, by the way. It fully understands virtually every Greek character I throw at it, functions, integrals, square roots, complicated polynomials, trig functions, matrices, everything I use). It's well-worth getting some hardware to mess around with those. Plus, OneNote seems (qualitatively) snappier.
How about a cheap upgrade.. Vista users should only have to pay $50 to upgrade to the equal version of 7!
Agreed. I've had Vista about a year now and I'm gonna have to pay $120 to upgrade it? No.
Microsoft can call it the "Oops, Our Bad" Upgrade.
Boo hoo why should they give you a cheap upgrade? Vista is fine and will continue being fine after 7 comes out.
If you've used Vista for a year the your machine will be powerful enough to run it so quit yer bitchin'.
Biggest thing I've noticed is that Left 4 Dead takes about HALF as long to load now!
That could be thanks to having a WDDM 1.1 driver. There are numerous benefits in having one.
Thats great!
hehe poor Mac users stuck with WOW...
WAITAMINUTE!
"Peek" looks like it has "card" mode just like the Pre!
I wonder who owns the patent on them!
(perhaps "thumbnail windows" would apply to both, eh?)