Here's a little something
OCZ Technology cooked up just for
CeBIT: a PCIe enclosure that'll contain 1TB worth of SSD storage with maximum read rates of up to 600MB/sec and maximum write speeds of up to 500MB/sec. Oh, and the sustained write speeds are right around 400MB/sec. Essentially, this device will contain four 256GB MLC-based OCZ SSDs along with 256MB of ECC DDR2 RAM; when slapped in one's desktop, they can choose to set it up as the boot disk or a slave. OCZ is also hoping to offer a 4TB edition by the end of the year, which is totally plausible given that 1TB SSDs are
already a reality. The on-hand demo was just a mockup shell, but the finalized version shouldn't look much different than what's pictured in the gallery below. As for pricing and availability? It should hit the US of A in around six weeks for somewhere between $1,500 and $2,000. It's high-end, y'all.
Compared to the $14,400 for the 320GB ioDrive Hell yeah.
http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/11/fusion-ios-iodrive-tested-worlds-fastest-storage-confirmed/
BTW, this is for servers imo. (Why isn't it low profile!!! Arg)
Thanks for the memories: http://www.yesterpc.com/Hardware/Plus%20Hardcard20/item.htm
I'd rock that if it was in the $200 range. But at a minimum $1370 premium over a standard HD, I'll spend the cash on my car or a bigger TV or something.
Wonder how this would play with the Avid systems at work....
Well, considering it isn't made by Avid, I'm going to say it won't "work" at all. Evil Avid...
Geez, hell yea its high end my MacBook Air was about that price......but i want one!!!!
These drives are well within justification extremes of a fair percent of readers that live in their parent's basement. :)
Ouch. I tipped Engadget on this like 3 days ago.
Even if it does start out at this price, in a year it will be down to affordable levels for gamers.
Oh, lah dee dah..."PCIe Slot", huh? "PCIe Hole" not good enuff for you upper class peeps!
Hey, they reinvented the hard card!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardcard
Now, will this use the PCIe bus for actual transfers? Or is it just powered by the PCIe and will have a standard SATA2 connector?
Because if it uses the PCIe bus for data, I doubt any current BIOS would be able to recognize it to boot from.
Never mind, I don't know what I was thinking. It probably reports to the BIOS as any standard RAID card would.
Mac bootable? If so, I'm in for one in my Mac Pro!
$1500? In three years they'll be giving these away in boxes of cereal.
You eat huge boxes of cereal.
Robots eat silicon chips.
Here's a silly question:
What are typical SATA r/w speeds for 1TB drives these days? Specs for HDDs don't seem to list that metric, they just claim "3.0GB/s" because they use SATA 2, which is obviously not accurate for actual transfer speeds.
omg im in love! for that price and performance its worth it. i am getting this. maybe wait till they announce the 4TB version so maybe the price will drop a little tho
I'll take two. As soon as they come down to about $150-$200 instead of $1500-$2000.
The end of the era of significant loading times is getting close, hopefully they'll be in the next round of game consoles aswell.
So if the write speed is 500 mb/sec, that means that ANYTHING you transfer to it has to take around 20 seconds or less guaranteed! I guess that would require you to have something with a read speed of 500 mb/sec but you get the idea :)
500 MB times 20 equals 10 GB.
it's actually 2,000 seconds
lol, wow i feel like a dumbass... thanks for that
Stop comparing it to the Fusion ioDrive. This draws power over PCIe but transfers over SATA. That means over the slow-as-christmas SATA bus, then through the southbridge, etc, etc. It's not even remotely comparable to the Fusion ioDrive which operates with latencies in the MICROseconds not MILLIseconds. The Fusion ioDrive is closer to DRAM than it is to this NAND flash over SATA.
If you bothered to look at the benchmarks, it reports speeds between 400 and 600 MB/sec. That's between 3.2 Gbit/sec and 4.8 Gbit/sec. SATA right now is 3.0 Gbit/sec. Do the math.
Nice, but the price needs to come down.
I've coveted the FusionIO Drive since I first heard about it. It makes sense to go the PCIe route rather than to wait for SATA to catch up, and considering the 640GB FusionIO Drive was released in late 2007 I think $2000 is VERY reasonable for a 1TB PCIe SSD.
This just looks like 4 SSD's with a RAID controller all running in a plastic enclosure that takes up two PCIe slots. And I'm sure the only reason for the PCIe interface is so the RAID controller can connect to the host (this is "Fusion like" not "Fusion Exact").
Want to see the difference of standard SSD's and Fusion just go read the Tom's Hardware review and see how the Fusion card, which has software running in the host kernal, kicks the pants off Samsung and Mtron SSD's in real world examples.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fusioinio-iodrive-flash,2140-7.html
Fusion just needs to ship the sub $1,000 ioXtreme already!
And here's the link to the workstation review in the same Tom's Hardware article:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fusioinio-iodrive-flash,2140-6.html
And you'll probably still get killed by improper partition alignment...
Price is amazing. Alternate: 4x160GB Intel SSDs + Raid card = DAAAAAAMN