New iPod shuffle first hands-on (with video!)
We just nabbed one of Apple's new button-free iPod shuffles, and in case you were wondering: yes, it's really small. We're gonna play around a bit with the VoiceOver navigation and get you our full impressions in a few, but at first glance we think this is totally usable, especially for the shuffle's sweaty target demographic. Also: it's really small.
Update: In-depth impressions are after the break, along with video!
Setup
Unboxing wasn't the Apple's best, but it was easy enough to get at all three components in there: the shuffle, the earbuds and the USB adapter. Setup was similarly slightly more complicated than the regular iPod, since in addition to requiring an update to 8.1, it required an installation of VoiceOver -- it all happens quite automatically with a couple clicks of automation, but it's an extra step all the same.
The actual formation of VoiceOvers for our tracks and playlists was easy enough that it was actually difficult to even spot iTunes working on it. Since our iTunes library is larger than 4GB, we built a few playlists, set them to sync with the shuffle, clicked sync and were ready to go in seconds. According to Apple, the space used up by the VoiceOvers on the shuffle is "negligible" and doesn't impact that vague "1000 songs" figure.
Usage
Excuse the audio, we had to tape the earbud to our camera mic for obvious reasons (to Apple, anyway). Also note that VoiceOver mispronounces the words "live," "VH1" and "Pitchfork."
The controls are harder to use than a traditional shuffle button layout, and it depends on how you wear the shuffle as to whether the placement of the controls on the cord is better than having them on the player. That said, it's really not difficult at all to use even the most "advanced" features here (like playlist browsing) and Apple has essentially made the controls to train you to delve into that functionality.
With the newer iPods and iPhones people are already used to pausing and starting the music with a click, and double clicking for skipping forward isn't much of a stretch. A triple click to skip backwards seems like the silliest gesture here -- and really, would it have been so hard for Apple to put a set of controls on the player? -- but it's not a deal breaker. The track identification and playlist features, however, both being unavailable on the original shuffle, would have required some learning any way you slice it, unless Apple were to add a button or two to the original layout -- something they're none too fond of doing.
Holding the button to hear the track name is simple and easy, and to go to the playlist mode, you just press and hold long enough to hear a beep. After that the shuffle just starts reading off names of playlists, you don't need to keep clicking to tab through them, and a single click sends you to one of the playlists. If you don't hear anything worth jumping to, you don't need to touch anything and the shuffle will return to the music you were playing. Both the song identification and playlist features speak over top of the song you're currently playing, which fades in and out accordingly.
Hardware
The player itself makes the old shuffles like almost giant in comparison. Its featureless face might be a bit odd if it weren't for the fact that your thumb covers the entirety of the player when you hold it. The shiny clip in back is impressively strong, and gravity should have a tough time knocking this off your workout clothes. Though suspiciously small, the off / shuffle / loop switch is easy enough to toggle with a fingernail.
Unfortunately, Apple's biggest mistake here might be with the one thing it didn't change: the earbuds themselves are terrible at staying in most ears, which just doesn't fly for a player that's primarily designed for workouts and those "on the go." It's also a needless hassle to buy an adapter cable to output songs to a stereo or a car -- Apple itself had a hacked cable to demonstrate the player to us with a sound system. Interestingly, you can plug a regular old pair of headphones into the player, turn it on, and it'll play music just fine -- you just don't have any playback controls. The stop / start button on existing Apple headphones does nothing.
Wrap-up
Still, people seem quite satisfied to put up with this sort of inconvenience and hassle when it comes to Apple, and with design, size and build quality like this, not to mention the welcome addition of VoiceOver, we imagine those third party accessory makers are going to like this new shuffle just fine.
Update: In-depth impressions are after the break, along with video!
Gallery: New iPod shuffle first hands-on
Setup
Unboxing wasn't the Apple's best, but it was easy enough to get at all three components in there: the shuffle, the earbuds and the USB adapter. Setup was similarly slightly more complicated than the regular iPod, since in addition to requiring an update to 8.1, it required an installation of VoiceOver -- it all happens quite automatically with a couple clicks of automation, but it's an extra step all the same.
The actual formation of VoiceOvers for our tracks and playlists was easy enough that it was actually difficult to even spot iTunes working on it. Since our iTunes library is larger than 4GB, we built a few playlists, set them to sync with the shuffle, clicked sync and were ready to go in seconds. According to Apple, the space used up by the VoiceOvers on the shuffle is "negligible" and doesn't impact that vague "1000 songs" figure.
Usage
Excuse the audio, we had to tape the earbud to our camera mic for obvious reasons (to Apple, anyway). Also note that VoiceOver mispronounces the words "live," "VH1" and "Pitchfork."
The controls are harder to use than a traditional shuffle button layout, and it depends on how you wear the shuffle as to whether the placement of the controls on the cord is better than having them on the player. That said, it's really not difficult at all to use even the most "advanced" features here (like playlist browsing) and Apple has essentially made the controls to train you to delve into that functionality.
With the newer iPods and iPhones people are already used to pausing and starting the music with a click, and double clicking for skipping forward isn't much of a stretch. A triple click to skip backwards seems like the silliest gesture here -- and really, would it have been so hard for Apple to put a set of controls on the player? -- but it's not a deal breaker. The track identification and playlist features, however, both being unavailable on the original shuffle, would have required some learning any way you slice it, unless Apple were to add a button or two to the original layout -- something they're none too fond of doing.
Holding the button to hear the track name is simple and easy, and to go to the playlist mode, you just press and hold long enough to hear a beep. After that the shuffle just starts reading off names of playlists, you don't need to keep clicking to tab through them, and a single click sends you to one of the playlists. If you don't hear anything worth jumping to, you don't need to touch anything and the shuffle will return to the music you were playing. Both the song identification and playlist features speak over top of the song you're currently playing, which fades in and out accordingly.
Hardware
The player itself makes the old shuffles like almost giant in comparison. Its featureless face might be a bit odd if it weren't for the fact that your thumb covers the entirety of the player when you hold it. The shiny clip in back is impressively strong, and gravity should have a tough time knocking this off your workout clothes. Though suspiciously small, the off / shuffle / loop switch is easy enough to toggle with a fingernail.
Unfortunately, Apple's biggest mistake here might be with the one thing it didn't change: the earbuds themselves are terrible at staying in most ears, which just doesn't fly for a player that's primarily designed for workouts and those "on the go." It's also a needless hassle to buy an adapter cable to output songs to a stereo or a car -- Apple itself had a hacked cable to demonstrate the player to us with a sound system. Interestingly, you can plug a regular old pair of headphones into the player, turn it on, and it'll play music just fine -- you just don't have any playback controls. The stop / start button on existing Apple headphones does nothing.
Wrap-up
Still, people seem quite satisfied to put up with this sort of inconvenience and hassle when it comes to Apple, and with design, size and build quality like this, not to mention the welcome addition of VoiceOver, we imagine those third party accessory makers are going to like this new shuffle just fine.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 6)
who? @ Mar 12th 2009 10:02AM
It is pretty small, I'll give you that.
Samboini @ Mar 12th 2009 10:09AM
This is my favourite bit:
"at first glance we think this is totally usable"
Coming right after:
http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/11/the-new-ipod-shuffle-explained/
Schizophrenic much?
Look_Around_You @ Mar 12th 2009 10:23AM
"Schizophrenic"
Not that. They weighed their options and would rather shill for the Apple product...Again. Knowing totally that this would not be a discussion with a Sony player of the same type.
"Oh it's really usable. We really mean it! Please dont be mad at us, Mr. Jobs!"
Brian @ Mar 12th 2009 10:24AM
That's what she said!
Menos @ Mar 12th 2009 10:41AM
@brian
deathnote fan?
kccboy2004 @ Mar 12th 2009 10:43AM
"Great" = "Great".
"Superb" = "Superb"
"Usable" = code for "Pretty Crap" (only a moron would shell out cash for this).
Superlatives are used to express real feelings. "Usable" is about as low as you can go and still be polite.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superlative
"In grammar the superlative of an adjective or adverb is the greatest form of adjective or adverb which indicates that something has some feature to a greater degree than anything it is being compared to in a given context."
kccboy2004 @ Mar 12th 2009 10:46AM
"pretty small".
That is not pretty small. "Small" is a comparative term.
These are pretty small, that is ginormous in comparison.
http://images.google.ca/images?q=smallest+mp3+player&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=7R-5SeTUL4GEsQP0v9VI&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&resnum=4&ct=title
AJ in the East Bay @ Mar 12th 2009 10:47AM
"totally usable" is not much of a compliment.
Look_Around_You @ Mar 12th 2009 10:50AM
""totally usable" is not much of a compliment."
Now ask yourself since when does Engadget tiptoe in their use of language?
kccboy2004 @ Mar 12th 2009 10:52AM
"Pretty Small"
??? MobiBLU - July 2005 ????
An innovative mp3 player would include voice directed controls. "Forward" = "Forward", "Back" = "Back" etc etc.
Apple is just copying so many other companies that have gone before.
APPLE = "ME-TOO" !!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Jobs is the Emperor with no clothes
____________________________________
TT @ Mar 12th 2009 10:58AM
Ok, I'll say it:
That's what she said!
http://instantrimshot.com/
dan2600 @ Mar 12th 2009 11:05AM
"Now ask yourself since when does Engadget tiptoe in their use of language?"
only when talking about apple products that suck
garrenteed @ Mar 12th 2009 11:29AM
does it play movies?
yogi @ Mar 12th 2009 11:33AM
"It is pretty small"
That's what she said?
OneLove @ Mar 12th 2009 12:15PM
super laxatives.
Greg @ Mar 12th 2009 12:18PM
Duh. It was always easy to use. They decided to complain about it to try to stir up some drama. People are just pissed because Apple did this. This isn't the first time a music player has had controls like this, and they're very easy to learn and use. Just an example of people needlessly complaining about a product just because they have some issues with the manufacturer. In this case, Apple. Apple poses a great target. You have the anti Apple and Apple fanboys, then you have the people who will complain just because of the silliness of fighting over small details. It makes for good blogging and tabloids, oddly enough.
Robert @ Mar 12th 2009 12:19PM
@kccboy2004, I don't like talking to automated telephone services, much less my MP3 player. I'm not always in a position where I feel like I can talk. The scroll wheel was an innovative UI approach. Talking is annoying, in my opinion.
It seems like this set of controls they implemented was the best of the worst. It took something that originally seemed like a convenience-oriented control and turned it into the only control. They shoehorned functionality into the controls making it a little too complex when it was originally a fairly elegant way to do something without dragging a touch screen device out of your pocket.
I haven't seen one in person to determine if it's even possible, but some redundant backward, forward, and play/pause buttons on the side of the device would have been nice. It may be their choice was dictated by size rather than attempting to make innovative UI controls (and failing because of complexity).
Sea Urchin @ Mar 12th 2009 12:51PM
Small it is but what if your headphones stop working? How will you control it?
You'll have to buy new ones.............at probably $20+
crow610 @ Mar 12th 2009 12:53PM
that's what she said
required @ Mar 12th 2009 1:01PM
The packaging is pretty big. Does anyone know why they use so much plastic to ship the little thingamajig? Not very "eco".
Tinu @ Mar 12th 2009 2:00PM
Yup, they removed things like buttons to make it small.
Will apple or universities have classes to teach people how to use this thing?
"iShf1001 - Introduction to iPod Shuffle"
"iShf1002 - Shuffle for Intermediate Users"
Dodo @ Mar 12th 2009 4:26PM
Why do they still have white headphones?
who? @ Mar 12th 2009 4:33PM
I hate to say it, but the Apple haters are right, this is a really stupid idea on the whole. Having one button for so many functions is obscene! I sure hope this doesn't make its way onto their laptops. Before you know it, Apple will try and make us triple click to carry out an operation as simple as selecting a paragraph, or require that we hold down the mouse button to move a file! Where will this madness end?!??! :P
The controls are going to take a little getting used to, but so does every new computer, gaming console, and media player, even individual games usually have a learning curve of some kind. Playing Mortal Combat required a lot more button memorization than this does, and it was a pretty big hit. Cut the drama, this is far from impossible to adjust to and use effectively.
P.S. I think people are going to be a lot more miffed (as they should be) by the special headphones (or adapter) being a requirement, especially when they stop working.
Karl UK @ Jun 16th 2009 9:24AM
@ Samboini:
Schizophrenic?
One of the articles was written by Nilay Patel and the other by Paul Miller (self confessed mac book air lover... nothing wrong with that btw)
so no Engadget is not one person, they all have different views and the podcast will tell you as much.
Wwhat @ Mar 12th 2009 6:29PM
Designed to be smuggled into prisons? (if you know what I mean, and it's better if you don't)
wickedpheonix @ Mar 12th 2009 6:53PM
In regards to the controls, one of the things that Apple was proud of with the original iPod designs is that anyone could pick it up and start using it, and have figured out the controls by themselves without an instruction sheet or anything.
Nice to see that they've said "fuck you" to their origins with the new Shuffle.
smak @ Mar 12th 2009 7:40PM
Shouldn't the LOCK button be on the headphones? I mean, what's the point of breaking continuity there? Inconsistent Apple... Inconsistent!!!
nick @ Mar 12th 2009 8:44PM
That's what she said.
Sorry I just had to.
Phenoum @ Mar 13th 2009 1:26AM
Gotta love how the existing apple headphone with a control wont work at all (control wise). it would have been dreadfully simple for Apple to allow them to pause/play the shuffle - but they're greedy bastards and want to corner you into having to use the new headphones.
I've got an inkling these new headphones wont work with the iPhone - that would make a heck of a lot of sense - and this is Apple we're talking about ........
who? @ Mar 13th 2009 11:44AM
@Phenoum
They've been out for a while (with a built-in mic) and work fine with the iPhone and iPod touch. There are also a lot of third party ones out there if you want to save some cash.
BloodyHell @ Mar 13th 2009 6:41PM
"Before you know it, Apple will try and make us triple click to carry out an operation as simple as selecting a paragraph, or require that we hold down the mouse button to move a file! Where will this madness end?!??! :P"
That's the browser dumbass. Firefox, Safari, Opera, IE, BROWSERS BUDDEH.
who? @ Mar 13th 2009 7:50PM
@BloodyHell
No, it is the OS, and since when do you move files in your browser?
P.S. Safari is developed by Apple. so my comment would be a valid remark even if you were right.
vic bishop @ Mar 15th 2009 12:06PM
think this sums what most of us are thinking http://vicbishop.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/new-ipod-shuffle.jpg
neal.lucas @ Mar 12th 2009 10:02AM
I still believe the [future] dongle will make/break it.
apple was bold to not include buttons on the device.
i guess it's like the iphone without a physical keyboard...?
JB87 @ Mar 12th 2009 10:34AM
I'm not sure "bold" is the word I'd use.
kevin @ Mar 12th 2009 10:50AM
Yes, it's exactly like the iPhone without a physical keyboard.
Except that where the iPhone has a decent size touch screen with a graphic interface, this has...a button.
Yes, exactly alike.
The Man @ Mar 12th 2009 11:00AM
it is totally not like the iphone. the iphone's keypad while hard to use accomplishes a goal. this is just a stupid design. you are supposed to make things easier and more intuitive as tech advances. you have to click 6 times to skip 2 songs? again, lame!!!
Gnormie @ Mar 12th 2009 11:24AM
"i guess it's like the iphone without a physical keyboard...?"
It would be exactly like that if the iPhone had one button which you pressed 1 time for A, 2 times for B, 3 times for C....
Mark @ Mar 12th 2009 11:36AM
@The Man: actually no, you have to press 2 times, hold the button down and then press 2 times again and hold the button down. Pressing 6 times would be way easy by comparison
Jay @ Mar 12th 2009 12:22PM
@Mark
Then should 6 presses be 2 skips backwards or 3 skips forward? Choosing fairly high prime numbers could of course solve this problem for normal usage.
LordAdmiral @ Mar 12th 2009 12:41PM
Actually, if you're in the middle of listening to a song (past the initial 6 seconds) and want to skip backwards, you'd have to press 3 times, within 6 seconds, press another 3 times. That's 6 times, to skip 1 song. You'd need another 3 presses to skip another song, which makes it a total of 9 button presses for 2 songs. I wonder how long that single button would last.
They should've just made it press 3 times if under the first 6 seconds, press 4 times if beyond the first 6 seconds. But then they might neglect support for skipping backwards at the 6th second mark.
Personally, I don't like the standard way of having to press the back button twice to skip backwards one song, but it's the standard. This is even more work, and just as less desirable.
Darren @ Mar 12th 2009 5:51PM
The real question is how much thought and discussion does a little MP3 player like this really deserve? People are talking about this player is if it's some kind of investment.
The people who end up with one of these things either receive them as gifts or have *very* simple needs. For those people, the advantage of having a remote control on the phones outweighs the disadvantage of not having any buttons on this tiny, tiny device.
And Apple doesn't have to worry about cannibalizing their real iPod sales.
If my parents are any indication, these little things act only as gateway to a real iPod, and bonus now is that you get a remote control head phones *for free* that you can use with your bigger iPod, once you decide to upgrade. Win, win.
wichsenstar13 @ Mar 12th 2009 7:22PM
@Darren
Nice of you to step back, and look at it from an unbiased point of view. I had the typical engadget reader's reaction to the first Shuffle: "Who would want an MP3 player that had no screen to choose your song? Shuffle?!? They're going to name the player after a feature I don't even use or like!! Apple is stooooooopid". But then I tried to teach my mom to use a computer. oooooooo boy. Most of the negative comments just don't seem to understand that this fits a need, not theirs, but others who want something simplistic.
And bang on about it being a gateway: you get them using the "simple" and "cheap" player first, then they'll gradually want to graduate and upgrade to the players with more features and higher margins.
lotsofpaper @ Mar 12th 2009 10:03AM
how does it sync? through the 3.5?
William @ Mar 12th 2009 10:05AM
Yes, the previous shuffle had a dock type connector that works through the 3.5mm jack.
Just guessing it would be the same here.
Erm, how does it change song?
Kate F @ Mar 12th 2009 10:09AM
If you look at the photos you'll see a short USB to 3.5 cable.
I'm assuming they're said goodbye to the dock concept for the shuffle. Not that I'm upset or anything.
Samboini @ Mar 12th 2009 10:10AM
William, you have to watch the Apple introductory video to find that out. The video is optional, at $19.99.
TenaciousJ728 @ Mar 12th 2009 10:49AM
The controls are on the earbud wire. It's identical to the iPhone's earbuds with the "talk" button but this time it has the iPod controls.
PiperSon @ Mar 12th 2009 12:51PM
@samboini yeah but you get the lovely Hannah :o)
dandaman @ Mar 12th 2009 3:43PM
@piperboy
um... maybe i'm different from other engadget readers b/c i see real females once in a while (hint: they're not with you in your basement) but i don't get what you see in her