From the title of the article: All three browsers hijacked and exploited on day one. From the text of the article: All three browsers failed miserably, oh, and BTW, a few hours ago Balmer came out and made a wild statement that has just been proven wrong.
I know you need a daily anti-apple/anti-engadget/go-winmo rant a day, but lay off the meth and read the actual article instead of sounding like a complete paranoid tool...
Yes, I don't understand the complaint with the article. It simply pokes fun at Microsoft because this news coincides with statements made by Microsoft's CEO regarding IE8 that is being launched today. It seems fair enough to me. I mean, the author is hardly ignoring that an Apple product was compromised.
Take a breath and chill out. I mean, it's not like this is something important. If you want to get annoyed about something that actually matters, get annoyed at AIG.
In fairness it's also acknowledged that Safari has unrivaled security although in this case that means that everyone knows it's the worst one out there by miles.
I agree with Saad: they were hacking IE 8 BETA, that's beta, not the gold version released today.
And to Thomas Ricker: I think you have problems with your logic: when Ballmer said "protection that no other browser can match", it doesn't mean zero vulnerabilities in IE, but he meant that IE is the most secure, even if it DOES HAVE vulnerabilities. And using biased phrases like "So much for "protection that no other browser can match," eh Mr. Ballmer?" just show the low level of your "professionalism".
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
God! Thomas. Some of you guys at Engadget need to be punched on the face with a full load of "how not suck up to Apple so much". Grow the hick up!
Reading.Fucking.Comprehension.Fail!
From the title of the article: All three browsers hijacked and exploited on day one.
From the text of the article: All three browsers failed miserably, oh, and BTW, a few hours ago Balmer came out and made a wild statement that has just been proven wrong.
I know you need a daily anti-apple/anti-engadget/go-winmo rant a day, but lay off the meth and read the actual article instead of sounding like a complete paranoid tool...
Yes, I don't understand the complaint with the article. It simply pokes fun at Microsoft because this news coincides with statements made by Microsoft's CEO regarding IE8 that is being launched today. It seems fair enough to me. I mean, the author is hardly ignoring that an Apple product was compromised.
Take a breath and chill out. I mean, it's not like this is something important. If you want to get annoyed about something that actually matters, get annoyed at AIG.
In fairness it's also acknowledged that Safari has unrivaled security although in this case that means that everyone knows it's the worst one out there by miles.
Its also rude to constantly insult editors.
seriously, knock it off.
Sadd Rabia the Microsoft Evangelist, everybody let's give him a hand full of "-"
Really?
A couple of days ago he was talking about getting an iPhone, so he was a hero.
Now, not so much?
I agree with Saad: they were hacking IE 8 BETA, that's beta, not the gold version released today.
And to Thomas Ricker: I think you have problems with your logic: when Ballmer said "protection that no other browser can match", it doesn't mean zero vulnerabilities in IE, but he meant that IE is the most secure, even if it DOES HAVE vulnerabilities. And using biased phrases like "So much for "protection that no other browser can match," eh Mr. Ballmer?" just show the low level of your "professionalism".