Crossing fingers for 3.2 MP MAX! In fact 2.1 MP would probably be even better on this teeny tiny sensor. As Joe inferred, more megapixels = crappier, more noisy pics on micro sized sensors. Keep in mind that the sensors on regular digicams are a LOT bigger, and even THEY suffer from pixel stuffing. And it's all because of the ignorant masses who equate a larger number with higher quality. Any of you aware that DSLR sensors are more than 50 TIMES bigger than these cellphone sensors?
If you want better cellphone pics, USE BETTER OPTICS AND PROCESSING!!! Rant over. :) Ooops...almost.
The phone has 256MB of RAM and a 1GHz processor, which do the job reasonably well, though the Anna interface will likely leave something to be desired for many smartphone users.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Crossing fingers for 3.2 MP MAX! In fact 2.1 MP would probably be even better on this teeny tiny sensor. As Joe inferred, more megapixels = crappier, more noisy pics on micro sized sensors. Keep in mind that the sensors on regular digicams are a LOT bigger, and even THEY suffer from pixel stuffing. And it's all because of the ignorant masses who equate a larger number with higher quality. Any of you aware that DSLR sensors are more than 50 TIMES bigger than these cellphone sensors?
If you want better cellphone pics, USE BETTER OPTICS AND PROCESSING!!!
Rant over. :) Ooops...almost.
Put a FLASH on the new iPhone, please.