thats a ceohh no he didn't. I know u will think i am a fanboy but the first iphone was not buggey. 2.00 was buggey but was not the first touch screen phone apple did.
He's not talking about bugs, he's talking about how not everyone gets it perfect (i.e. pleasing everyone) which is impossible anyway but the iPhone isn't anything like perfect/exceptional. It may be very good but it certainly hasn't pleased everyone nor did Apple get everything perfect first time around (or there would be no need for firmware/hardware revisions)
@Gnormie: There is a difference between not being perfect and being crappy. The iPhone, for example, was not perfect when it was released, and actually it is still not perfect today, but people generally liked it. The subsequent software and hardware updates of the iPhone brought features that built on top of the solid core functionality, but none of them was really a crucial essential thing - neither push email, nor the SDK, nor even 3G. The Storm on the other hand is generally disliked for being clunky, clumsy and cobbled together. It is really a far cry from the usual Blackberry user experience, which although being quite a good one on its own is still behind the one the iPhone provides.
Ironically, the first iPhone was not buggy at all. The iPhone 3G on the other hand, was very buggy. In fact, the iPhone 3G is what most people expected the first iPhone to be, but somehow, Apple really delivered a solid platform the first time around. Most companies get it in reverse. They deliver something slow and buggy at first, but then it gets better in the second version.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
thats a ceohh no he didn't. I know u will think i am a fanboy but the first iphone was not buggey. 2.00 was buggey but was not the first touch screen phone apple did.
How do i know that i will be lowly ranked?
He's not talking about bugs, he's talking about how not everyone gets it perfect (i.e. pleasing everyone) which is impossible anyway but the iPhone isn't anything like perfect/exceptional. It may be very good but it certainly hasn't pleased everyone nor did Apple get everything perfect first time around (or there would be no need for firmware/hardware revisions)
@Gnormie: There is a difference between not being perfect and being crappy. The iPhone, for example, was not perfect when it was released, and actually it is still not perfect today, but people generally liked it. The subsequent software and hardware updates of the iPhone brought features that built on top of the solid core functionality, but none of them was really a crucial essential thing - neither push email, nor the SDK, nor even 3G. The Storm on the other hand is generally disliked for being clunky, clumsy and cobbled together. It is really a far cry from the usual Blackberry user experience, which although being quite a good one on its own is still behind the one the iPhone provides.
Ironically, the first iPhone was not buggy at all. The iPhone 3G on the other hand, was very buggy. In fact, the iPhone 3G is what most people expected the first iPhone to be, but somehow, Apple really delivered a solid platform the first time around. Most companies get it in reverse. They deliver something slow and buggy at first, but then it gets better in the second version.