Trust us, we've seen some
significantly distorted sneak peeks before, but the three
Pentax DSLR shots in the links below are certainly amongst the blurriest to ever tease our retinas. Obviously, it's next to impossible to glean anything other than the brand (Pentax) and style (DSLR) from the shots, though we will say that the mode dial's copious amount options has our interest piqued. Give 'em a look if you're not susceptible to motion sickness, and feel free to dish out your wildest accusations in comments below.
Update: Could
these be non-blurry pics? Or just meaningless renders? You decide. Thanks, Andrew!
Read - First sneak peek
Read - The other two
posted Apr 19th 2009 3:13PM
No, that's what he wants us to do.
Hey they deleted my "1st" comment!! the punks!!
http://cid-9c2325683f4c3b9c.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/摄影器材/PENTAX%20Rumors/IMG|_0153|_ps|_up.jpg
top left camera, much clearer image :)
You don't get much more blurrier than this. (2nd read link)
Mr. Blurrycam apparently could benefit from the acquisition of the pictured Pentax DSLR.
K2D
Mr. Blurrycam is just jealous.
Im surprised these companies are able to sell all these new cameras..I still have my Panny Lumix for 4-5 years ago, works great too..Id think these cameras are built better, and last longer..but still i see new ones always pop up!
More megapixels, better sensors, newer features?
lol ahh yes..Megapixles..the more the better;) Keep thinking that..
Yep, if you take crappy pictures the only thing more megapixels will do is allow you to make even larger prints of crappy pictures :)
@Peter
So, Camera Manufacturers should NOT bump up their camera specs to higher megapixel counts because the difference between 6 and 7 isn't much? Hell, I'd be pissed off if I needed to replace a camera that I bought 4 years ago and the new ones still offered 3 megapixels.. I just bought a 12MP and by the time I buy a new one if they standard isn't 20MP, It'd be a damn shame.
Sorry, my comment should have been directed to Ry.
@Flunky Carter
Even after the point where it's just empty resolution?
Lenses can only resolve so much. Some struggle to provide enough details for a 6MP sensor. And physics come into play as well. As you push the pixel density further and further, diffraction limitation becomes more obvious at wider apertures. Certain compacts (the G10 most notably) have already seem to hit that wall even wide open. DSLRs, with their larger sensors, fortunately don't start to feel the effect until about f8-11. For now.
Plus smaller pixels tends to result in more noise. At least on the pixel level... which may not be important when printing the same size as with fewer MPs, but it can limit just how much of a resolution improvement you actually get.. And worse this can sometimes have a negative effect on dynamic range.
If only there was a way to find the guys IP... then they would be less likely to do this, if they knew Ninjas or, even worse, the IRS would be going after them.
Mr. Blurrycam must be a huge drunk. I like his style and consistency.
Mr. blurry cam is the coolest guy on the internets.
Ironic for someone with so little focus in life.
So it's a camera-like object with PENTAX written on it.
It could be a film SLR....
In this day and age?
Oh no, not RiceHigh again....
Your second two "sneak peek" links were just images and commentary ripped from the Pentaxforum - nothing new there (except engrish).