Broadcom and Qualcomm agree to stop suing one another, but not to stop hating
Truthfully, we're having a hard time coming to grips with this. For as long as we wished that these two would stop bickering, it's actually tough to swallow the fact that we'll never again be able to write about "yet another lawsuit" between Qualcomm and Broadcom (in theory, anyway). After nearly three full years of fighting with pencils, papers and soulless words, the courtroom throwdowns are finally ceasing. In a shocking development, the two rivals have entered into a settlement and multi-year patent agreement that will "result in the dismissal with prejudice of all litigation between the companies, including all patent infringement claims in the International Trade Commission and US District Court in Santa Ana, as well as the withdrawal by Broadcom of its complaints to the European Commission and the Korea Fair Trade Commission." The exact terms of the deal are posted after the break, though you should know that Qualcomm will have to shell out $891 million in cash (ouch!) over the next four years. The lawyers may be out of work, but you can rest assured that there's no shortage of abhorrence between these frenemies.
The terms of the agreement include, among other elements:
* Broadcom and Qualcomm agree not to assert patents against each other for their respective integrated circuit products and certain other products and services;
* Broadcom agrees not to assert its patents against Qualcomm's customers for Qualcomm's integrated circuit products incorporated into cellular products;
* Qualcomm's customers do not receive rights to any of Broadcom's patents with respect to Qualcomm integrated circuit products incorporated into non-cellular products and equipment;
* Qualcomm agrees not to assert its patents against Broadcom's customers for Broadcom's integrated circuit products incorporated in non-cellular products;
* Broadcom customers do not receive rights to any of Qualcomm's patents with respect to Broadcom integrated circuit products incorporated into cellular products and equipment;
* Qualcomm will pay Broadcom $891 million in cash over a period of four years, of which $200 million will be paid in the quarter ending June 30, 2009. The agreement does not provide for any other scheduled payments between the parties.
Other terms of the agreement are confidential.
"We believe that this resolution is positive for both Qualcomm and Broadcom, our customers, our partners and the overall industry," said Dr. Paul E. Jacobs, chairman and CEO of Qualcomm, and Scott A. McGregor, president and CEO of Broadcom.
"The settlement will allow us to direct our full attention and resources to continuing to innovate, improving our competitive position in this economic downturn, and growing demand for wireless products and services," Jacobs said. "I am pleased that we have achieved this important settlement. At a time when the wireless industry should be focused on moving forward, the agreement removes uncertainty for Qualcomm and its customers."
"Today's settlement allows both companies to move on with their business and compete in the semiconductor sector as two of its innovation leaders," McGregor said. "We have set aside our differences while addressing the needs of our customers, our shareholders and the industry. In addition, the companies have worked together to achieve their mutual goals of improving the competitive dynamics of the industry."
The terms of the agreement include, among other elements:
* Broadcom and Qualcomm agree not to assert patents against each other for their respective integrated circuit products and certain other products and services;
* Broadcom agrees not to assert its patents against Qualcomm's customers for Qualcomm's integrated circuit products incorporated into cellular products;
* Qualcomm's customers do not receive rights to any of Broadcom's patents with respect to Qualcomm integrated circuit products incorporated into non-cellular products and equipment;
* Qualcomm agrees not to assert its patents against Broadcom's customers for Broadcom's integrated circuit products incorporated in non-cellular products;
* Broadcom customers do not receive rights to any of Qualcomm's patents with respect to Broadcom integrated circuit products incorporated into cellular products and equipment;
* Qualcomm will pay Broadcom $891 million in cash over a period of four years, of which $200 million will be paid in the quarter ending June 30, 2009. The agreement does not provide for any other scheduled payments between the parties.
Other terms of the agreement are confidential.
"We believe that this resolution is positive for both Qualcomm and Broadcom, our customers, our partners and the overall industry," said Dr. Paul E. Jacobs, chairman and CEO of Qualcomm, and Scott A. McGregor, president and CEO of Broadcom.
"The settlement will allow us to direct our full attention and resources to continuing to innovate, improving our competitive position in this economic downturn, and growing demand for wireless products and services," Jacobs said. "I am pleased that we have achieved this important settlement. At a time when the wireless industry should be focused on moving forward, the agreement removes uncertainty for Qualcomm and its customers."
"Today's settlement allows both companies to move on with their business and compete in the semiconductor sector as two of its innovation leaders," McGregor said. "We have set aside our differences while addressing the needs of our customers, our shareholders and the industry. In addition, the companies have worked together to achieve their mutual goals of improving the competitive dynamics of the industry."























interesting note, both own a former ATi division
we should sue them for this
lol, you made my night sir :P.
so for the consumer this means that....
someone enlighten me please :)
it means nothing.
To me it means... nothing. I like broadcom more though.
Qualcomm chips without any limitations FOR ALL!!!!...I think.
i read somewhere that this means nokia could make lots of cdma phones...
It means Henry Nicholas from Broadcom can now go back to building sex caves.
For lawyers its a sad day indeed.
about time... they were holding back each other and future innovation with this nonsense..
I used to love Engadget.
Then I did the math and found out that there have been 1,155 posts about the iPhone in the last two an a half years: http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphone/page/77/.
Really, Engadget? Really?
That should be "and a half", not "an a half." All apologies.
Ok… very related to the article, well done
So… how does that stack up with other gadgets? And so what if iPhone is getting the attention? How and why does it make Engadget, a gadget-related blog, "bad"? When you compare the proportions with # of iPhones posts with whatever, and compare that with say the number of articles/searches on cnet/google, does it correlate? My feeling is that it does… and considering that I've noticed how most of the iPhone-related posts here does generate a lot of comments (and hence traffic), again, why is it "bad" for Engadget to post them?
Stop the hating. It can't do you any good...
you guys should settle this in court
didnt the new blackberry niagara (sprint version) had some kind of problem with broadcom chip that why the sprint version is delayed so they can redesign it does this have anything to do with it? i know verizon was paying for the infringement of course that if the rumor was true?
"...between these frenemies"
Did you really need to use that word?
Does this mean better driver support now for my HTC Touch Pro? GAWD I HOPE SO!
I hope Monster learns from this.
"The lawyers may be out of work, ..."
... good. Nothing lost there. Less work for them, more useful work from either of these companies. Let these companies do, what they are the best at.
I know nothing about these companies and what they do, but I think that, their time will be much better spent by focusing at what they do best, what they are there for. Innovating and implementing technology than fighting against each other, diluting their resolve, in meaningless wasting wasteful practices.