It is a burden if you only have one development machine. Applications developed under SDK 3.0 can not be submitted to the App Store review process, even if they were developed under the SDK 3.0 but targeted at 2.x.
That means, if you only have one Mac to develop on, or one iPhone or iPod touch to test on, then you're effectively locked out from submitting new applications to the App Store until Apple release 3.0 to the public, or possibly only slightly before if we're that lucky. Effectively this brings a halt to app releases or updates to existing apps already in the store from small developers until much later this year...
The Chromebooks are here, starting with Samsung's Series 5, a cute little number that promises instant-on access, 3G connectivity, and long enough battery life to web surf with the best of 'em.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
It is a burden if you only have one development machine. Applications developed under SDK 3.0 can not be submitted to the App Store review process, even if they were developed under the SDK 3.0 but targeted at 2.x.
That means, if you only have one Mac to develop on, or one iPhone or iPod touch to test on, then you're effectively locked out from submitting new applications to the App Store until Apple release 3.0 to the public, or possibly only slightly before if we're that lucky. Effectively this brings a halt to app releases or updates to existing apps already in the store from small developers until much later this year...
You can't possibly predict that. Why waste your time posting it?
Seems a little childish to me.
Maybe it just means anything developed on the 3.0SDK will run just fine on 2.2?
Well if you have access to the development tools. You have access to OS 3.0 already.