"the only downside is that you can't flaunt that logo"
That can't be the only downside.... I'm guessing it won't have google's apps, right? If that's the case then it's certainly not worth it. Plus, I hate exchange.
Anyways, it makes perfect sense that it can't be part of stock Android, since stock Android is free and open. Dunno what that would have to do with "with Google" unless Google has a clause saying they won't let their apps be on a proprietary build perhaps. I'm certainly no Google fanboy, but in this case I gotta say: way to go Google, stick it to the man!
"I'm moving to a small studio and for some reason the cable connection is in an awkward place and I need a way to transmit HD quality video and audio no more than 20 feet away. What is the best wireless HDMI transmitter / receiver for this situation? Thanks!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
"the only downside is that you can't flaunt that logo"
That can't be the only downside.... I'm guessing it won't have google's apps, right?
If that's the case then it's certainly not worth it. Plus, I hate exchange.
Anyways, it makes perfect sense that it can't be part of stock Android, since stock Android is free and open. Dunno what that would have to do with "with Google" unless Google has a clause saying they won't let their apps be on a proprietary build perhaps. I'm certainly no Google fanboy, but in this case I gotta say: way to go Google, stick it to the man!