Engadget Labs: The best mobile data carrier in America

Gallery: Mobile Data Card Shootout
The cards
From the onset, we sought to pit the cheapest cards from the four major US carriers we could against one another. After all, performance at the bottom is a good indication of what you should be able to expect at a bare minimum. Furthermore, there's really no need to pay for a WWAN card these days; you're signing away your cellular soul for two years -- the least a carrier can do is toss you a card gratis. Furthermore, we chose only USB data sticks for two reasons. First, we wanted a uniform interface across the board, and T-Mobile only offers a USB card. Secondly, USB is far and away the most widely available connection, with not everyone moving to an ExpressCard-equipped machine just yet. It should be noted that none of the cards we tested had external antennas, so what you see is what you get. Without further ado, here are the combatants:
- AT&T: Sierra Wireless USBConnect Mercury, free after a $100 mail-in rebate and a 2-year data plan ($249.99 sans commitment)
- Sprint: Sierra Wireless 598U, $29.99 after a $50 mail-in rebate and a 2-year data plan ($249.99 sans commitment)
- T-Mobile: Huawei webConnect USB Laptop Stick, $49.99 after $200 instant rebate and 2-year data plan ($249.99 sans commitment)
- Verizon Wireless: UTStarcom UM175, $29.99 outright with a 2-year data plan ($79.99 sans commitment)

The testing
Before we get to the semantics, there's something you should know about mobile data: it's completely unpredictable. While one may have great coverage and throughput at home, heading down to South by Southwest or CES -- where towers are notoriously strained -- could throw a nasty kink in your upload plans. In short, there are oodles of variables when it comes to snatching and maintaining a solid WWAN connection, most of which you have little to no control over. A good thing to consider before buying one card over another is whether your actual smartphone has trouble with data. If you find that your carrier can't consistently provide solid data to your mobile browser due to overloaded towers (in an area that you frequent, obviously), you'll probably want to focus your attention on results of the other operators.

Put simply, we fired up each card on a Windows XP laptop, using a variety of urban, suburban and rural locales for testing. Currently, T-Mobile's webConnect card is the only one of the bunch that won't work on a Mac, though the carrier has been promising support "soon" ever since it debuted in March. To check download, upload and latency measurements, we used DSLReports' Flash 8 speed test, which has become somewhat of an unofficial standard over the years. We tested six separate locations a half dozen times, throwing out the outliers and coming up with an average that we felt was truly representative of our experience. We've got the full findings below, but here are the highlights:
- AT&T's download rates obliterate the other guys. Seriously, it's not even close.
- AT&T's upload rates are the strongest, though T-Mobile and Verizon held pretty close here.
- Each carrier's average latency was right around 150ms, which will undoubtedly make online gamers (snipers, in particular) weep.
- Sprint and Verizon's WWAN management software was far superior than that of AT&T and T-Mobile, and considering that T-Mobile's app won't run on a Mac yet, it gets yet another strike against it.
- As always, your miles (or data rates, as it were) may vary depending on location, network saturation, wind speed and amount of fairy dust in your pocket, but we're pretty confident these data are a solid guide.
- If you're used to thinking of upload and download rates in terms of KBps (much like you see when downloading a file in Firefox), here's the breakdown of that.
- AT&T: 239.01KBps down; 77.95KBps up
- Sprint: 121.27KBps down; 36.94 KBps up
- T-Mobile: 127.33KBps down; 54.05KBps up
- Verizon: 102.9KBps down; 63.22KBps up

The cost breakdown
As we alluded to earlier, we attempted to snag the cheapest card we could from each carrier. Sprint does offer a few free-on-contract cards, though they only had the $29.99 (on contract) 598U available for loan. T-Mobile has a grand total of one 3G data card, which runs $49.99 on contract, and Verizon's cheapest card was the $29.99 UM175 that we tested. At present time, AT&T offers a couple of free-on-contract cards to choose from.
Contrary to popular belief, all four major US carriers offer capped mobile broadband plans to consumers. In other words, it's not unlimited. In fact, you'll only get 5GB of throughput per month before those nasty overage charges start to kick in, so you should go ahead and cast aside those dreams of using an AT&T data stick to replace your in-home cable internet service. We can't say we like the cap, but that's just the way things are at present time -- hopefully we'll look back in a year or so and laugh at the preposterousness of plans past.
| Cost Breakdown |
Return to Top | |||
![]() AT&T USBConnect Mercury
|
![]() Sprint 598U |
![]() T-Mobile webConnect
|
![]() VZW UM175
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Card Cost (on contract) |
$0.00 | $29.99 | $49.99 | $29.99 |
| Monthly Plan Cost (5GB) |
$60.00 | $59.99 | $59.99 | $59.99 |
| Overage Costs |
$0.49/MB |
$0.05/MB |
$0.20/MB |
$0.05/MB |
| Other Plans | 200MB for $40/month; overage at $0.10 per MB |
None | None | 250MB for $39.99/month; overage at ~$0.10 per MB |
| International Data Cost (base) |
$15.36/MB in Canada; $19.97/MB elsewhere internationally |
$16.38/MB |
$10/MB in Canada; $15/MB elsewhere internationally | $2.05/MB in Canada; $5.12/MB in Mexico; $20.48/MB other Intl. CDMA regions |
| Extra International Options |
Yes; see here |
No | No | No |
| Activation Costs |
$36.00 | $0.00 | $35.00 | $35.00 |
| Other Stipulations |
GSM; worldwide roaming capability |
300MB/month max use on non-Sprint networks; CDMA; no worldwide roaming |
GSM; worldwide roaming capability | CDMA; no worldwide roaming |
So, here are the highlights:
- Every major plan runs right at $60 per month for 5GB of throughput.
- Sprint is the only carrier that avoids dinging you with an activation fee.
- AT&T and T-Mobile are the only two with true worldwide roaming support (GSM bands).
- International data roaming is absurdly expensive; you're infinitely better off just buying a prepaid data card in the country you travel to.
- AT&T offers the most data card options; T-Mobile offers the least (just one).
- Even domestic overage charges are pricey; don't buy a data card to act as your primary ISP -- this stuff is for backup / traveling only.
- Sprint will cut you a $9.99 discount if you bundle a data card in with a phone in a Simply Everything package.
The coverage
Coverage is a funny, finicky thing. And oftentimes, you can't even take those blotchy coverage maps as the absolute truth. For example, your data card can typically roam on partner networks if you find yourself in a remote location, so things may not always be as hopeless as they initially look.
Verizon Wireless Data Coverage
Based on native coverage from each carrier, Verizon Wireless (shown above) has the best coverage in the United States, with AT&T (shown below) close behind, although it's 3G service isn't available in many locales. Sprint follows behind them, though it's roaming network is quite vast; we should remind you, however, that your $60 monthly data plan only allows for 300MB of throughput while roaming, so that benefit is severely hampered. T-Mobile's US data coverage is borderline pathetic at this point, but considering that it just got into the 3G data card game a few months back, we'll cut 'em some slack now in hopes of seeing massive improvements in the near future.
We're providing coverage links for each carrier below to allow you to scope things out in the area you call home, but we can already say that T-Mobile probably shouldn't be your top choice at the moment. The anemic network and inability to roam domestically really kills it when compared to the other guys.
T-Mobile Data Coverage
Oh, and then there's the matter of international roaming. Without a doubt, the only cards for jetsetters to get are those sold on T-Mobile and AT&T's networks. These are the only two that operate on GSM frequencies, which is far and away the dominant technology outside of the US. In fact, only a few nations outside of North America have any significant CDMA coverage, so if you plan on spending any amount of time surfing in Europe, it's GSM or bust. That said, we actually wouldn't recommend selecting a carrier here in America based on how robust the international roaming options are. In every scenario, it's drastically cheaper to head overseas and pick up a prepaid data card from a local carrier -- like O2 in Germany, for example, which offers a USB data stick with a month of unlimited usage in the country for just €69.99 ($96). A Benjamin for unlimited usage in Deutschland, or $20 per megabyte? An easy choice, obviously. Of course, it's nice to have the option of hoping online in any corner of the world if necessary, but with the growing pervasiveness of WiFi, we certainly wouldn't rule out the CDMA carriers here in the homeland just because of that.
Sprint Data Coverage
- AT&T Coverage Map (click 'Data')
- Sprint Coverage Map (click 'Data, Email and Multimedia')
- T-Mobile Coverage Map (click 'Data Coverage')
- Verizon Wireless Coverage Map (click 'Broadband & V CAST')
Other considerations
As with most everything in life, the devil's in the details. Sure enough, there are a few non-glaring things to take into consideration beyond the obvious when it comes time to select a WWAN card, so we'll do our best to cover those here. First off, Mac users should avoid T-Mobile's card -- at least for now. OS X software has been "coming soon" for far too long, which just doesn't rub us the right way. Also, we had a mess of a time getting Sprint's application to play nice with OS X 10.5, though OS X 10.4 had no problems with it. Possibly a one-off thing, but hey, there it is.
As we stated earlier, Sprint and Verizon Wireless' connection management software was easily the best. AT&T and T-Mobile could really use some work on the application end; both apps got the job done, but they certainly aren't robust in any way. Sprint's portal even provides easy links to GPS applications, speed tests and all manners of extras.

Flexibility wise, T-Mobile and AT&T are superior. If you run across a pal with an AT&T data card, you can just pop their SIM in your stick and use that monthly allotment if need be, and the same goes for T-Mobile. Also, T-Mobile and AT&Ts cards are far more useful overseas due to their GSM nature, but again, we don't expect you to take advantage of that too often with the international roaming rates being as ludicrous as they are.
As for card design, all four of the units that we tested were pretty average. We will say that Verizon's UM175 was our least favorite, as it was definitely the largest and had a rather strange spring mechanism for covering and uncovering the USB head. We greatly appreciated the microSDHC slot on the webConnect and the microSD slot on the USBConnect Mercury / 598U. As you could likely guess, the VZW unit was the only stick sans some sort of expansion port, and unfortunately for Big Red fans, the carrier doesn't provide an awful lot of choices when it comes to WWAN cards.

As for deals, you can trim $9.99 per month (in theory, anyway) from your monthly data plan with Sprint should you also buy a smartphone and snag the $149.99 Simply Everything plan. AT&T users with a LaptopConnect plan of $59.99 and up will receive complementary AT&T WiFi Basic access at thousands of the outfit's hotspots around the country. Similarly, those who buy a T-Mobile webConnect card will get unlimited WiFi throughout the company's 'HotSpot' network.
Finally, we'd be remiss of our duties if we didn't point out a little solution by the name of MiFi. The Novatel-sourced device is essentially a pocket-sized EV-DO router that creates a WiFi hotspot for any and all WiFi-enabled devices to tap into. Sadly, the plans that accompany this device -- which is only being made available on Sprint and Verizon Wireless for the time being -- are still capped at 5GB. In other words, this thing makes it a lot more convenient to dip into those overage charges each month. Still, it's a viable option for those who can live with a unit larger than a thumb drive (and dig VZW / Sprint), though the up front price of $99 (after rebate and two-year agreement) is on the high side for this discussion. Hey, you pay for added functionality.
Wrap-up
Sadly for consumers, we can't compare these options on monthly throughput allowance or monthly rate plans. In a fashion that only a colluder could love, the big four here in America all have matching monthly rate plans with matching monthly caps (5GB). So much for choice, right? In our view, it's also somewhat frivolous to compare the offerings on international compatibility considering that you're always better off just picking up a prepaid option from a local operator upon your arrival overseas.

So, what are we left with? Raw speed figures and coverage, really. Based on coverage alone, we'd select Verizon first (from a national standpoint) and AT&T second. Naturally, you'll need to visit those links in the 'Coverage' section to see which carrier is superior in your neck of the woods. Unfortunately, Verizon was the slowest of the bunch (albeit not by much), and AT&T was the victor by a country mile in terms of Kbps. If it's speed you're after (and really, who's not after speed?), we can't help but recommend AT&T -- if you're within one of the carrier's limited 3G areas. The other caveat here is that for whatever reason, AT&T's reliability -- particularly in densely populated areas -- has been disreputably suspect. If you're an existing AT&T user and can't seem to get a solid 3G signal on your smartphone where you're at, don't expect a LaptopConnect card to act any differently. Frankly, that goes for all carriers. Aside from T-Mobile, which just doesn't have the coverage to compete right now, you can hardly go wrong with any of these options. But as our speed tests have shown, you'd need a darn good excuse to avoid AT&T if the coverage and reliability is right.



























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Andrew @ May 26th 2009 4:18PM
I've been using the AT&T one for about 3 months now. I'm very satisfied with it, no complaints thus far!
BioTech @ May 26th 2009 4:57PM
Wait until the 1st year is over...
Overall, I find At&t okay. I have never had dropped calls in the last 5-6 years I have had them, customer service is a pain, and coverage was only a problem once for me.
I recommend it, but would never use it for my whole life. I'll test out Verizon after my service ends.
Joe K. @ May 26th 2009 5:08PM
Never had a problem getting AT&T on the phone, but I use the premier service, so maybe that's the difference.
Quix @ May 26th 2009 6:23PM
Wow, so much for the "AT&T sucks, thus so does Apple!" diatribes you hear from Engadget commenter horde. FUD, thy face has been revealed.
Me, I've never had a problem with coverage from AT&T on my iPhone.
James @ May 26th 2009 5:22PM
T-Mobile + $5.99 prepaid plan + hacks FTW!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH!!!
only nubs pay retail!
le Chen @ May 26th 2009 6:02PM
AT&T call center is in Canada
Caveman @ May 26th 2009 6:06PM
@ Quix
I love my iPhone, but I can tell you without a doubt that AT&T's service is subpar to Verizons in the southern California.
The problem with this test is that Engadget did not reveal where they were testing the service at. They only gave us a vague : "using a variety of urban, suburban and rural locales for testing."
Check Gizmodo's website. They did a test similar to this 6 months or more ago. Their test were a lot more detailed as far as their criteria. Engadget is basically telling you to gauge everything by your smartphone.
I'm not certain, but I wouldn't doubt most of these tests were performed in NY and maybe San Francisco.
p3t3b2 @ May 26th 2009 6:33PM
I want to know where Engadget did this test, as many have said Gizmodo did a very detailed test. I am detecting some ATT (cough Apple) butt kissing. There is no way in hell Tmo beats Sprint or Verizon. GSM networks in the US are so clutter and bogged down. I hate to think this is all made up but it is surely looking like it.
bjsguess @ May 26th 2009 7:04PM
Sprint WinMo phone tethered via BT or USB + SERO = 5GB data for $30 (also includes unlimited texts and 500 minutes). Been doing it for a year and is the only way to go.
Perkoff @ May 27th 2009 4:05AM
Why no mention of Millenicom http://www.acun.com/ $60 a month and no stupid 5 gig a month cap. Whoa with 5 gigs a month I could watch youtube for a few days and be screwed the other 27 days of the month.
kamilatl @ May 27th 2009 6:09PM
If you know what to do you can easily get unlimited data for 10 bux a month. I have it for 3 months now and my lappy does 1.6mbps down and 1.4mbps upload on speedtest. net. i dont want to give away the secret so they dont stop it but its pretty easy to figure out. just go to att website find data plans and figure out how to get the 10 dollar unlimited data.
james, curious as to how u did it?
Matt @ May 26th 2009 4:25PM
How about Linux support?
And the normal price on those things seems way too much. How much do you think it actually costs to make them?
Mark Swope @ May 27th 2009 12:02AM
I have a Sprint (Novatel) ExpressCard data card and ubuntu happily loads it and kicks it off!
megamanexent @ Jun 1st 2009 11:34PM
Att mercury card works on ubuntu jauntu :-)
bumper44 @ May 26th 2009 4:28PM
I personally like AT & T myself, I find them much faster.
loosely_coupled @ May 26th 2009 9:20PM
(sorry to hijak your comment but this is very important )
**** IMPORTANT ****
This analysis is incredibly flawed. they compared speeds using carrier's 3G networks, but then used COVERAGE MAPS THAT INCLUDE 2G SERVICE!!!! AT&T doesn't have NEARLY the footprint of Verizon's 3G network and the proof is right on their website! How could Engadget be so stupid?
cyriac.kandoth @ May 31st 2009 11:19AM
RTFA: "Based on native coverage from each carrier, Verizon Wireless (shown above) has the best coverage in the United States, with AT&T (shown below) close behind, although it's 3G service isn't available in many locales."
Guru @ May 26th 2009 4:47PM
Att obliterated other carriers.
Maybe that has to do with iPhone insane success?
So verizon sprint tmobil too slow here in usa insane!!!!!
Eric @ May 26th 2009 4:47PM
Gotta love AT&T!
Brian @ May 26th 2009 4:49PM
I found Sprint faster then AT&T in the DC area. Plus, Sprint is cheaper.
Templarian @ May 26th 2009 4:53PM
Yea, those maps show why almost every person I know has Sprint in Michigan.
(also, yay for Palm Pre).
DirtyDeuceDropper @ May 26th 2009 5:22PM
Agreed, I have tested ATT, Verizon, and Sprint in the DC an NOVA areas, Sprint has the most consistent coverage and speeds.
THJ @ May 26th 2009 5:04PM
According to the chart above, Sprint is $.01 cheaper per month. Not a dealbreaker, IMO.
Haven't used sprint broadband in DC metro area, but AT&T is pretty solid signal/throughput. Laptop software (both Mac and PC) is atrocious though.
krische @ May 26th 2009 5:10PM
@THJ
Yeah the $0.01 is true. But I guess, who doesn't have a cell phone as well. I think Sprint is the only one that offers a discount when you bundle the broadband card with a cell phone plan.
Sisyphus @ May 26th 2009 5:18PM
I can add my +1 on Sprint being snappy and reliable in the D.C./ Suburban Maryland region.
JCerna @ May 26th 2009 5:24PM
Sprint is faster than ATT in San Diego CA, but ATT has better phone coverage. At times I get DL speeds of 800kbs or more using phone as modem
Miguel @ May 26th 2009 6:53PM
I agree...I live in the Baltimore/DC Area and coverage is excellent And Bundling the Card with a Phone plan is a good deal.
Not to mention that the 4G Card is pretty fast as well.
nerdtalker @ May 26th 2009 7:52PM
Same. Sprint is cheaper and faster where I am in Arizona. AT&T has speeds which are pretty much horrible.
As much as I love DSLR (I post there constantly under the same handle), the speedtest.net test is much much more reliable and much much more of a standard than the flash test they have.
xtreme571 @ May 26th 2009 10:09PM
Sprint is faster by a mile in my area than all other providers.
Guru @ May 26th 2009 4:49PM
This is exactly what i've been saying I've tested storm instinct iPhone n g1 all on same desk time n time again.
iPhone 3g won every time insane!
krische @ May 26th 2009 5:12PM
It's different on phones though. There more factors that affect observed speed (processor power and the phone's web browser). For instance, in your example, the iphone has a faster processor than all of those phones, so the web browser would be much faster at rendering/processing.
Jacob @ May 26th 2009 6:11PM
Go away, troll!
Templarian @ May 26th 2009 4:51PM
Nice job AT&T, per MB is equal to death.
I have VZW built into my Dell, wish I had a reason to buy it.
murmermer @ May 26th 2009 11:06PM
hmm I'd rather have double+ speed since 95% of data card owners NEVER go over the 5GB limit
Don Corleone @ May 26th 2009 4:52PM
The internets are so overpriced in the US. Insane.
LondonConsultant @ May 26th 2009 7:18PM
In the UK, it's £15 ($22) for 15GB per month on 3. But in the US, it's $60 average for 5GB per month. So, mobile broadband seems to be over 8 times more expensive per GB there. Whoa...
Maeztro @ May 26th 2009 7:58PM
True....but you can cover all of the UK with what...4 or 5 towers? :)
bob cobb @ May 26th 2009 7:59PM
and the UK is the size of some of our states
THJ @ May 27th 2009 11:54AM
I think most Canadians, Australians and New Zealanders would disagree with you.
dyt1983 @ May 27th 2009 1:57PM
@THJ
You really think most of them still believe they are part of the UK?
John Thomas @ May 26th 2009 4:53PM
You can use the t-mobile webconnect with mac if you flash it with huawei's firmware from their website and it also removes the software lock
Stroker Ace @ May 26th 2009 4:53PM
If only my iPhone 3G would actually make phone calls without dropping constantly on AT&T's oh-so-fast network.
It's plenty fast at 5 bars, but unfortunately it goes back and forth from 5 to 0 frequently without moving, so if you're trying to maintain a voice call, not so useful.
DirtyDeuceDropper @ May 26th 2009 5:22PM
In DC where I have tested, 5 bars does not mean anything on ATT. I can have 5 bars and not even make calls when I am inside some buildings. But I still love my Iphone too much.
Jason Covert @ May 26th 2009 5:10PM
I hate to say it, but it sounds like you have a flawed unit: get that thing to a store and let them check it out.
My phone used to do that - I took it in, they replaced the SIM card and all was right in iPhone land.
Do yourself a favor!
akaKJB @ May 27th 2009 1:12AM
I just don't understand comments like "I can't make a call but I sure love my iPhone!". Isn't that the point of the PHONE? To make a bloody call? Maybe it's defective or maybe it's saddled to a system that just doesn't work where you're at (I'm in the market for Sprint's home base and I know people who can't use it in their front yards, so I'm not just AT&T / iPhone bashing here).
Simply put, if you can't place a call, the phone just doesn't work. I can't think of any other phone that has people so enthralled with the logo on the back and not its performance. Bash on WinMo all you want - all I know is that when I try to make a call, it goes through and all the internet options have worked flawlessly.
Guru @ May 26th 2009 4:53PM
I hate AT&T vzw sprint n tmobil
I only use network that has best phone out at time I even hate apple but I know iPhone to be insanely superioir to all other smartphones on so many levels.
tym @ May 26th 2009 4:55PM
sprint's ev-do rev. a data is awesome.
abram @ May 26th 2009 4:56PM
I can only compare ATT and Verizon here in Austin,Tx. ATT is complete and utter sh!t. Verizon has it beat hands down. Ive used it on my drive from Austin to Houston and Austin to South Texas and ATT did horribly. It was slower and didnt have nearly as good of coverage as Verizon. Too bad my company decided to change to ATT because I really miss Verizon.
BioTech @ May 26th 2009 4:59PM
At&t has better coverage on the East Coast. Verizon is better in Gulf Coast and Midwest.
(Based on coverage charts)
Microdot @ May 26th 2009 5:26PM
@ abram
can only compare ATT and Verizon here in Austin,Tx. ATT is complete and utter sh!t. Verizon has it beat hands down. Ive used it on my drive from Austin to Houston and Austin to South Texas and ATT did horribly. It was slower and didnt have nearly as good of coverage as Verizon. Too bad my company decided to change to ATT because I really miss Verizon.
not sure what you are comparing with... but i have seen the exact OPPOSITE here in austin... and it sounds like we follow the same path. i live in cedar park, and have full signal +3G at all times... ive never seen it drop inside the city once in my 3+ years with them (now on an iphone 3g). true, there are large swatches on the trip to houston down 290 that get no data... but i have voice all the way. on the flip side of that... my girlfriends blackberry (verizon... i think its a curve, but honestly dont remember. shes had it replaced several times now) is constantly dropping calls and getting no signal. her laptop card is useless. literally. completely, totally, useless. there is no connection in the house, or in the car anywhere... step outside, and there might be a faint signal, but at painstakingly slow speeds. shes on her second card now.
and its getting better daily. we have a lake house at lake buchanan... none of us could get cell service out there (northwest of burnet) until last month... when all of a sudden i hear a little email ding. i checked, and sure enough... full bars, and edge network now. she still gets nothing.
so maybe its your equipment... but every single one of my employees, and all of my family has no issues here in austin with at&t. verizon is crap here though. tmobile gets a thumbs up however.