GigaPan Epic 100 hands-on and review, panorama style

Gallery: GigaPen Epic 100 hands-on
Overview and setup
For those who aren't totally familiar with what the GigaPan Epic is, here's the long and short of it: is a robot that you strap your camera into, and once you select the top left and bottom right corners of a panoramic image that you'd like to compose, you simply mash 'Go,' step away and let the thing work its magic. From there, it fires off as many shots as it needs in order to capture the selected landscape, and once you're home, it's up to you to find the first and last of the series and plop the set down in the company's multi-platform (Mac and Windows) software. The Stitcher application -- which, by the way, is free to download -- blends the images together to create a somewhat seamless panoramic image, and from there, you can save it for editing in Photoshop and / or upload it to GigaPan's website for panning and zooming galore.

All that sounds easy enough, right? Well, not really. GigaPan provides a series of videos (yes, a series) that explains what all is needed to even begin creating your first panorama. Needless to say, this unit is definitely not one to buy if you're hoping for something that's just plug-and-play. After absorbing ourselves in instructional videos for a solid half hour, we then spent a good 10 to 15 minutes precisely mounting our Canon SD850 IS on the platform. Once our P&S was strapped in, we wheeled on out to the lake for a few test runs. We should mention that the unit we tested was the $449 Epic 100, which is a slightly larger version of the $379 Epic. The extra coin goes toward a larger camera base for a wider range of supported cameras, and it gives users the option of triggering the camera shutter at a faster pace.
User experience
Here's the thing: GigaPan's Epic 100 is rather large. It's heavy, it's unwieldy and totally inconvenient to carry around. It's not like you can just toss this in your pack, head out for a stroll and hope you see a nice vista. No, you plan to use this device. It's simply too cumbrous to lug around when you may not use it, and the fact that you have to reattach and realign your camera each time you remove it for "normal camera duties" makes this even more unattractive. In other words, you have to really want to take a panorama to make the effort of dragging this thing out.

There's also a very precise way you have to set your camera up before a panorama can begin. If you bother watching Part II of the aforesaid setup video series (it's exhilarating, trust us), you'd know this -- otherwise, you may wonder what you've done so wrong. Here's the highlights: camera on, optical zoom maxed, set to manual mode, image quality and resolution maxed. When all that's in order, you're finally able to begin setting up a shot. After popping six AA cells in the battery holster and turning the machine on, you'll see a somewhat intuitive menu system walk you through the process of aligning a capture. We did very much appreciate that it tells you how many vertical and horizontal images you're about to take so you'll have a rough idea of how much memory card space you'll eat up and how long you'll be waiting around for it to finish.
In our testing, we found that it took right around 6.2 seconds per shutter press. So for a panorama involving 120 images, you'll be sitting around enjoying the view for around 12.4 minutes. Not awful, really, but not hasty either. We also got the impression that this thing sucks down a serious amount of juice. After snapping five panoramas ranging from 12 to 120 shots apiece, the low battery indicator popped up. Given the amount of movement involved, we guess we aren't too shocked, but you should probably plan on carrying a round of spares if you know you'll be doing a serious amount of shooting.
As for the gratis software? We must say, it's pretty robust. After you painstakingly sort through your camera files in order to find the first and last image of each panorama you've just taken, you simply drag and drop a collection of images (from a single panorama) into the program, adjust the amount of columns, select a few advanced options if you like, and then wait as it churns through and creates a single image. Our 2.4GHz / 4GB RAM machine assembled a 36 image panorama in under half an hour, for reference. Once that's complete, you simply punch your GigaPan.org username and password into the software and hit 'Upload." Obviously, the resulting files here are rather large, so slower connections will be waiting hours for some larger panoramas to upload.
Results and image quality
By and large, we were impressed with how well the software stitched together our images. Without zooming in, almost every single one looked flawless. The GigaPan website also does a fantastic job of letting users pan and zoom, showcasing a remarkable amount of detail when fully zoomed in. The biggest knock we have on this whole setup isn't really the Epic 100's fault: it's how it handles moving objects. If you have any humans, animals or other moving objects in your shot at any time during the shooting process, beware -- if that person / object flinches, you'll notice it.
If zooming into the image below (click to be taken to the GigaPan website), you'll notice that the anglers over on the far right look whole when fully zoomed out. If you zoom in, you'll notice a nasty case of vanishing face -- like something straight out of The Ring. In other words, the applications here are kind of limited. You really need a still landscape shot to snag a panorama worth paying this kind of entry fee for, and at places where you'd love to have one (at a wedding, a college graduation, etc.), you'll likely have loads of moving Earthlings screwing things up.
Wrap-up
Without a doubt, the Epic 100 is capable of capturing some amazing scenes provided that you can get yourself there. But it loses some of its luster when you realize that moving objects will end up marring the shot somewhat. In our mind, you'd need to be some sort of avid traveler or a postcard photographer in order to justify the cost of this otherwise fascinating device. It truly makes the art of taking panoramic shots a lesson in (relative) simplicity, but in our mind, the utility here is just too limited to warrant the steep price tag. If you know that you're the kind of shooter who could benefit from a better way to capture massively wide-angle shots, you'll be hard pressed to find anything superior to this. For everyone else, we're exceedingly sorry to say that it's just not a practical purchase.






















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
stefan @ May 29th 2009 1:10PM
try zooming in on the two headed freak in the green shirt.
obviously best for stills...
Jared @ May 31st 2009 4:43PM
I prefer the floating fishpole.
Steve @ May 29th 2009 1:11PM
...or you can just use panorama mode and twirl around yourself.
AMiSH PiRATE @ May 29th 2009 1:29PM
twirl around ourselves? in this day & age? what do you think we are, buddy, robots?!
Hoyun @ May 29th 2009 2:09PM
But all panorama modes I've seen only allows one frame in height. The Gigapan allows as many as you want. For example panorama mode has say 1 frame by 6 while the Gigapan can do 5 frames by 6 getting you a larger field of view. And more importantly the Gigapan allows for GIGApixel images so you can zoom in without a loss of quality.
That said would I get this? No, I'd rather save some money and get a panorama head
decapitor @ May 29th 2009 2:49PM
yeah just get autopano pro and do the robot pano dance a few times and you're all set.
hansning @ May 29th 2009 6:19PM
@Hoyun: A good Pano Head is the Nodal Ninja 5, combined with a decent rotator, costs just about the same as the epic 100. I dunno if you've tried taking gigapixel images before, but it's EXTREMELY tedious and long. This seems so much more practical.
I couldn't find what the minimum degree of rotation is though, and it doesn't seem like you can use cameras in portrait mode.
ThreeDee912 @ May 30th 2009 8:24PM
Use Hugin. It's open source and works with tons of different kinds of lenses and can make panos of multiple heights and widths.
Not the friendliest UI to use, however.
Chad @ May 29th 2009 1:12PM
Anyone else think it was a fish-finder by looking at the first picture?
Saad Rabia @ May 29th 2009 1:17PM
Actually, the first thought that came to my mind is: GigaPan Epic 100 hands-on and review, panorama style.
I know.
xtrmcheeze @ May 29th 2009 1:20PM
I definitely did, not sure if it would be a first for engadget, but it would definitely a welcome addition!
MONKEY @ May 29th 2009 1:39PM
I thought it was a lake monster finder. Now that could be useful
LondonConsultant @ May 29th 2009 1:15PM
The faceless woman on the left-hand side of "Lakeside GigaPan Test III" has an alien bursting out of her chest...
LondonConsultant @ May 29th 2009 1:17PM
Oops, that should have been "Lakeside GigaPan Test IV"
loosely_coupled @ May 29th 2009 8:18PM
HAHAHH! I saw that too... Could be an alien, could be a giant male anatomical feature..
Nick @ May 29th 2009 1:26PM
Interesting, I saw this in the new tech section of Popular Science and thought it must be too good to be true.
bridge @ May 29th 2009 1:31PM
Is that Bass Lake? It's right down the street from me.
Engadget247Checker @ May 29th 2009 1:31PM
ok if you go to this one .org website pertaining to this device and look at a certain picture, the edge of the shot is all messed up.. haha wow.. not worth 350$+...
Martin @ May 29th 2009 3:24PM
You really sold me on those hard facts there, buddy.
Looks like I won't be getting a GigaPan Epic 100.
Mystic @ May 29th 2009 1:32PM
I don't know if it's the camera or the pano software, but those pics look HORRIBLE!!
Makavre @ May 29th 2009 1:38PM
the alignment is horrible ....
should've called it the "GigaPan Epic FAIL 100"
rBz @ May 29th 2009 1:40PM
possibly because the image was optimized for the web, meaning the smallest file size with only ok image quality.
regardless... this contraption is definitely not as useful as it is made out to be.
max stubbs @ May 29th 2009 1:43PM
Agreed, a bad stitch up or just bad pictures. You can see each photo rectangle.
ahecht @ May 29th 2009 1:57PM
The pictures look bad because whoever took them either forgot to turn off auto shutter/aperture/iso or because the camera used doesn't offer a full manual mode. The camera's auto features mean that the brightness isn't consistent from shot to shot, making it look blocky in high contrast areas. This is most obvious in the last picture, although you can see it around the sign on the canoe pic as well.
Another issue making these pictures look bad is that panoramas tend not to work so well on days with patchy clouds, as the overall lighting can vary quite a bit in the 12 minutes the exposure takes. This shows up in the dark streak on the right of the first image.
None of these are faults with the GigaPan -- they are operator errors.
FreshJulius @ May 29th 2009 3:26PM
Thank you Ahect.
I knew enough to know that was the case, but not enough to explain it!
Martin @ May 29th 2009 3:26PM
It's mostly to do with it not being a static scene.
Joe @ May 29th 2009 1:32PM
You've got a bit of a butt-crack in that first image.
Joe @ May 29th 2009 1:33PM
And by "the first image" I mean the first panorama. http://share.gigapan.org/viewGigapan.php?id=24202
m @ May 29th 2009 3:11PM
Plumber's crack and half ghost girl.
normanhayward @ May 29th 2009 3:16PM
yes, nice frickin' pencil holder. is that the norge refrigerator repairman?
nxp3 @ May 29th 2009 1:34PM
The panasonic dmc-zs3 has a pretty good panoramic feature. It display the edge of the picture you take previously so you can align it with your next image...if you are into that stuff.
TRS @ May 29th 2009 1:39PM
hmm...maybe they could use this on those google streetview cars to automatically blur out people's faces and avoid more controversy
:D
urandom @ May 29th 2009 1:45PM
What value does this thing bring, exactly?
yuppicide @ May 29th 2009 2:04PM
I fell in love with the Gigapan ever since I first saw it last year or so.
I plan on getting the Epic 100 along with a Canon camera that has 20x optical zoom built in.
Hoyun @ May 29th 2009 2:11PM
If you dont mind rotating and taking the pictures yourself you can save some money with the Nodal Ninja.
hansning @ May 29th 2009 6:06PM
since the good nodal ninja costs about the same, i rather get it done with a machine. just waiting for their SLR version.
GeekPI @ May 29th 2009 2:04PM
Steep price tag? A high quality, uber distortion filled fish eye lens for an SLR costs more than this.
If you into shooting high quality, wide angle shots, $449 + a point and shoot camera sounds like a steal.
Ryan @ May 29th 2009 2:15PM
Guys, try stitching the images using autostitch and you'll have way better looking results.
http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~mbrown/autostitch/autostitch.html
Rifter @ May 29th 2009 2:20PM
I know I would love to have one.
I shoot hand-held panoramas all time time, and love the sweep and scale they give. I REALLY don't like that I can't zoom in far with them.
Imagine these pictures, with the full, gigapan zoom treatment...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3485545508/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryfter/3208966536/ (oh yea, and don't shoot a panorama, when using a circular polarizer... oops!) :-)
I would really like to have one of these, just takes money. :-)
JohnnyGTO @ May 29th 2009 2:24PM
Try pricing a professional panorama mount if you think this is pricy.
Jim @ May 29th 2009 2:39PM
The Panorama app by iFoneGuys on my iPhone works pretty damn good and produces similar results albeit not at the same quality due to the camera.
Karl @ May 29th 2009 2:44PM
Didn't Bruce Dern have one of these in Black Sunday?
superhobo @ May 29th 2009 2:56PM
Fails.
LocalToast @ May 29th 2009 2:59PM
Do they make one for the Game Boy Camera? I can never hold it perfectly still when shooting my 3-frame panoramas.
adam @ May 29th 2009 3:12PM
What is with the sudden urge to use the word "avoirdupois" to mean "weight"? Twice in two days. Is this some B-tard meme I haven't heard about yet?
beeperr @ May 29th 2009 3:16PM
It was the word of the day earlier this week on Dictionary.com...I'm glad somebody else noticed - I had been giggling to myself.
t0asterb0t @ May 29th 2009 3:51PM
If you want to see some really nice quality 360 degree panos, check out www.roundus.com. Just found out about them last week, they've got a really nice setup for uploading panoramas.
kiwi @ May 29th 2009 3:57PM
holy crap, that bird has no head!
http://share.gigapan.org/viewGigapan.php?id=24218&window_height=847&window_width=1267
Warren @ May 29th 2009 4:07PM
Hmm, can anyone say "Nintendo DSi" and "ulead 360"? Cheaper, fun and friendly. Nice shot Giga.
TIMMAH! @ May 29th 2009 4:29PM
What's up with the halos around things? There's halos around the sign poles, the houses, and the person fishing from the chair.