1. Do not ever compare what Napster is offering to what Zune is, both services are deffirent in their own way and the Zune wins just for the fact that you can "download" and use that music in your car and or any place where you can connect to a sound export gadget from your Zune: a media player.
2. Zune HD is NOT a gaming device/platform and is not targeted for gamers. It is an HD video/music player with touch and is thin enough to carry around. Period. Music lovers will still buy the Zune 120 and /or other market options.
The whole Zune Pass thing is stupid and isn't going to help Microsoft. It's not like you can fill your Zune with songs that way. For example, Microsoft says that it will cost you 30,000 to fill an iPod, but to get 30,000 songs using Zune Pass's 10 song credit, it would run you $45,000 in Zune Pass subscription fees over 250 years. And that's if you remember to use your 10 song credits every month, because they expire a month later.
Subscriptions for Music is just something that people aren't going to accept, no matter how you repackage it. If Microsoft was doing to great with it, why the heck aren't they even in second place? SanDisk is still taking them to the cleaners for God's sake.
Paul, you can always buy more then 10 songs on the Zune whenever you like and as much as you want, even after using your 10 songs.
In theory, to fill 10 GB of your iPod with legal songs you have to pay the same amount of money that will get you over 20 years of Zune Pass, that is more than what you will ever need.
Also Zune is still new, give it a little time and you'll see how people will go for it, just like how people love Netflix now.
But if you're paying a subscription every month AND buying songs, what good is the subscription? That's like having sex with your wife every month for free, while paying to sleep with prostitutes. Why waste more money when you can just stay home?
That's why most sane people won't use Zune Pass. It doesn't make much sense to pay for music every month, when you're just buying songs too.
I buy physical CDs from online auction sites, at an average of around $5 a pop. Pretty much anything you want, new or old. Bonus: I have a physical copy that I can burn to whatever format I want, as often as I want.
When I want some variety, I just stream last.fm.
But what do I know, I'm still using an ancient iPaq 1935 as my PMP.
As a Rhapsody subscriber/Zune owner, I've gotta disagree. I'm fine renting my music, since there ends up being not a ton of new material I'm really interested in anyway. I do, however, think that the marketing campaign was deceiving and flat out irritating. Also, your right, subscriptions probably will never catch on (unless Apple does one).
That being said, I don't plan on getting a Zune pass.
Also, I'm pretty sure SanDisk is in second because you can pick up one of their players for $20.
I had a conversation with a Zunebot and he brought up the same point. He was like, "Man, with Zune Pass I can test drive songs before I buy them" and I was like, "Why don't you just listen to the radio?"
He looked at me dumbfounded for a moment and then said, "F*ck you!"
I mean, really, isn't that what the radio is for? Why else does the Zune have a radio? Subscription models don't work because people are cheapskates. They don't like monthly fees for something unless it's vital, like electricity or water. But whenever I hear someone say they want to "test drive" their music, I think of Pandora on an iPod touch or the radio on the Zune. It's totally unnecessary to "test drive" your music and pay for it.
So I can listen to entire albums on the radio now? Awesome! Please let me know what station to dial in for that capability. I'd love to check it out!
Seriously, now -- unless all you care about are the current Top 40 hits, then the radio *alone* is just fine. For the rest of us, though, we enjoy these things called "albums" -- you know... 10 songs, 12 songs, etc... all recorded and packaged together! They're great!
You either "get" the subscription music thing, or you don't. You are a Mac-lovin'-knob, Paul, and thus I'm not surprised that you don't get it. It appears to be your lot in life. Many of us, however, have moved on and realize that subcription-based music is actually cheaper (in the long run) and likely the way things are going.
Paul, your arguments are always all over the place, sometimes I wonder if you are actually for real or just joking around!
1. You say "But if you're paying a subscription every month AND buying songs, what good is the subscription?":
A subscription is there to listen to music that you don't want to spend a full dollar on, For example, I downloaded Eminem's new album from Zune and listened to the whole album, not just a 30 seconds cut but the full songs, then bought one song that I like. Now, anytime I feel like listening to some other songs of the same album that I almost like I could easily go back and listen to the song from my Zune through my PC or WiFi whenever I like. Can't you see how that is awesome?! Maybe it is not what you like: Don't subscribe, just buy the music!
Buying songs is not what the subscription service is all about. This service is something like the Xbox Live Gold account, it is not the music that I only get but I also get along: Social interaction where I can find and set to automatically download music based on some of my friends' taste, I find detailed information about each artist, I get one of the hundreds of free professionally developed playlists that update every week with great music that I would pay or waste so much time doing it myself. I get to use the same account on three different Zunes on three different PCs. I learn more about an artist all in one place within one software.
Do you not see some value to all of that?
2. Then you talk about "That's like having sex with your wife every month for free, while paying to sleep with prostitutes"
To keep it simple, your wife is not a subscription material. Your example is too missed up.
3. Then later you bring up a fake story about some Zune user, comparing the "Radio" to the "Zune Pass".....!
That's comparing Apples to Oranges; At least in a radio station you don't have the choice of downloading your song and playing on any speaker of your choice at the time of your choice, and I can go on with the reasons, but, it isn't even worth it.
Man, why can't you accept things and face the facts? Why do you always have to fake your way or create some nonsense arguments into proving a point?
"to get 30,000 songs using Zune Pass's 10 song credit, it would run you $45,000 in Zune Pass subscription fees over 250 years. And that's if you remember to use your 10 song credits every month, because they expire a month later."
Is this a serious statement?
You're not comparing what matters: access to music, not ownership.
"30,000 songs using iTunes: $30,000."
Lifetime (50 years) of unlimited songs, plus 6,000 songs to "keep" (if you really need to): $9,000.
It should be obvious that a subscription service is not a method to buying individual songs to keep -- the 250 year metric is pointless. The 10 songs a month to keep are a bonus (and are merely there as an insurance/incentive), so if you cancel your subscription down the line you're not left with nothing.
In reality, you wouldn't be left with nothing, since you got value each month from your music (you wouldn't say 10 years after buying a gallon of milk that it was all for nothing). Keeping the extra songs is sort of just a psychological extra to get people who are attached to the concept of music ownership to rationalize the subscription service as less risky.
"All I'm saying is that people who want to own their music are going to just buy it anyway. People who rent music, are just going to rent it, but it's rare that you're going to see people who do both."
Not really, this isn't what you stated first. The problem with your arguments isn't bad words or wrong grammar but it is the fake stuff that you claim or conclude which boggles the mind. You seem like a guy who likes to talk, but you sometimes over think or really just not think at all before talking.
You always start by denying facts, then disapproving them, followed by fake backing and then a weak outro as if you didn't mean it.
Think man, think a little, share your opinion with at least some real facts after giving it some thought, is that really hard for you?!
Look at it this way, $15.00 a month to download and keep any song you want, on top of that, while you are paying $15.00 a month you can download and listen to an unlimited amount of songs.
Downloading the "Hottest" songs on itunes at 10 songs a month would cost $13.00. I realize im using the most expensive songs as an example, but the "Hottest" songs are generally the ones played on the radio, which are apparently the only songs worth listening to with your logic. An extra $2.00 a month to have access to any song seems pretty good to me.
The following statement is really not true at all. I can't believe you actually said "Any song worth listening to on an album is going to be played on the radio" First of all, no. Second, you can't arrange a radio stations playlist, and if you want to hear a certain song, chances are, it wont be played for a while. Third, the quality on the radio isn't so great.
You said that you never met anybody with a Zune, but you have had conversations with Zune owners about ZunePass. Which is it, you did or did not meet somebody with a Zune? You should really write these things down so you can keep your lies in order.
As for the "Zunebot" comment - no, you are not a Apple loving, Microsoft hating person, you just report things fairly and with "facts".
You do realize that most people don't listen to thousands of songs, nor do they fill up their music device with that much music from online purchases. You can compare your gigabyte to the dollar all you want. The fact is, it's a rip-off for the majority of users, hence it will never gain the popularity you see with per purchase stores.
A side note, I applaud Microsoft for taking an edge with the OLED screen, further advancing the screen's market. Though, I don't see the marketing sense at the moment. Are most users going to care? No.
Apple made a smart move not differentiating the software from iPhone and the iPod Touch. The problem I foresee with Microsoft's applications market is that they are for a myriad of devices running two different operating systems. Thus is Microsoft must sell the new Zune off-the-shelves to save the application store that has yet to see fruition.
Civil discussions usually involve facts, and usually do not involve prostitutes and the chauvinist belief of owning ones wife.
@ Saad
I felt you were right on with the benefits of a subscription service, really hitting one of the lesser known points of community interaction. I had iMesh (the name was around way before iTunes), which allowed you to look at different users profiles, and music they listen to. This was great for finding new music from users with similar tastes.
"Any song worth listening to on an album is going to be played on the radio, so why waste $15.00 a month listening to something that you can get for free anyway? That sounds stupid to me."
are you fucking kidding me? there's so many things wrong with this sentence I can't let it go by:
1) so if any song worth listening to on an album is going to be played on the radio, then that means all non-singles in the history of music are not worth listening to. 2) there's commercials on radio 3) on-demand...being able to listen anything you want whenever you want. you can pick exactly what you want to listen to on the radio now? i had no idea! thanks paul! 4) older stuff...most radio stations play recent music, within the last 2 months or so.
there's really just no comparison between the two at all. your "argument" is almost like comparing black & white broadcast tv to netflix...but makes even less sense.
i feel dumber after having read what you said and we are all a little bit worse off in our lives after you decided to type in this thread. may god have mercy on your soul.
I've had my Zune for almost 2 years now and have had the Zune Pass since I got it. I have nearly 30,000 song plays counts. There are also tons of other people who have far more plays than I do and seeing as how rapidly the artist/song/album play counts rise, there are people are lot of people using Zune. So there is a huge chunk of people who play thousands of songs, go poke around last.fm so that statement doesn't stand well.
I don't feel like I'm getting riped-off, I have nearly 8,500 songs at my disposal anytime of day plus the 5 million I can stream if I'm near a hotspot or on a computer. Personally I see the Zune Pass as a HUGE value. With the universal popularity of music, the subscription model can easily work, you just have to get people to understand what it means to use subscription music, their limitations, and their advantages. Zune on Xbox can push the Zune and Zune Pass like crazy if done well.
@Paul, As a former Yahoo-to-go subscription user, the Zune Pass is a great deal.
1. Fill up is cheaper than iPod: assuming 50 years more of life: $30K iPod, $15K Zune, not even counting the 6,000 free songs bonus, nor counting that you can constantly swap out songs for fresh ones as your tastes change or boredom sets in. 2. Radio fidelity is bad compared to download. 3. Radio choice in music is bad compared to download. (Radio jocks limited playlist vs. whatever you want.)
OK, you're not a fan of subscription music. But watching Yahoo and orig. Napster having trouble making money on this service at $15/mo., the Zune Pass at $15 - $10 owned music (if you remember to do this each month, as you say) = $5/mo. I suspect Microsoft is losing money on Zune Pass to stimulate the market.
The Rip is the latest addition to the Boogie eWriter line, devices that let you scribble notes and drawings and can be wiped away with the press of a button.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
1. Do not ever compare what Napster is offering to what Zune is, both services are deffirent in their own way and the Zune wins just for the fact that you can "download" and use that music in your car and or any place where you can connect to a sound export gadget from your Zune: a media player.
2. Zune HD is NOT a gaming device/platform and is not targeted for gamers. It is an HD video/music player with touch and is thin enough to carry around. Period. Music lovers will still buy the Zune 120 and /or other market options.
The whole Zune Pass thing is stupid and isn't going to help Microsoft. It's not like you can fill your Zune with songs that way. For example, Microsoft says that it will cost you 30,000 to fill an iPod, but to get 30,000 songs using Zune Pass's 10 song credit, it would run you $45,000 in Zune Pass subscription fees over 250 years. And that's if you remember to use your 10 song credits every month, because they expire a month later.
Subscriptions for Music is just something that people aren't going to accept, no matter how you repackage it. If Microsoft was doing to great with it, why the heck aren't they even in second place? SanDisk is still taking them to the cleaners for God's sake.
Paul, you can always buy more then 10 songs on the Zune whenever you like and as much as you want, even after using your 10 songs.
In theory, to fill 10 GB of your iPod with legal songs you have to pay the same amount of money that will get you over 20 years of Zune Pass, that is more than what you will ever need.
Also Zune is still new, give it a little time and you'll see how people will go for it, just like how people love Netflix now.
But if you're paying a subscription every month AND buying songs, what good is the subscription? That's like having sex with your wife every month for free, while paying to sleep with prostitutes. Why waste more money when you can just stay home?
That's why most sane people won't use Zune Pass. It doesn't make much sense to pay for music every month, when you're just buying songs too.
I buy physical CDs from online auction sites, at an average of around $5 a pop. Pretty much anything you want, new or old. Bonus: I have a physical copy that I can burn to whatever format I want, as often as I want.
When I want some variety, I just stream last.fm.
But what do I know, I'm still using an ancient iPaq 1935 as my PMP.
"The whole Zune Pass thing is stupid"
As a Rhapsody subscriber/Zune owner, I've gotta disagree. I'm fine renting my music, since there ends up being not a ton of new material I'm really interested in anyway. I do, however, think that the marketing campaign was deceiving and flat out irritating. Also, your right, subscriptions probably will never catch on (unless Apple does one).
That being said, I don't plan on getting a Zune pass.
Also, I'm pretty sure SanDisk is in second because you can pick up one of their players for $20.
@Galactor693
I had a conversation with a Zunebot and he brought up the same point. He was like, "Man, with Zune Pass I can test drive songs before I buy them" and I was like, "Why don't you just listen to the radio?"
He looked at me dumbfounded for a moment and then said, "F*ck you!"
I mean, really, isn't that what the radio is for? Why else does the Zune have a radio? Subscription models don't work because people are cheapskates. They don't like monthly fees for something unless it's vital, like electricity or water. But whenever I hear someone say they want to "test drive" their music, I think of Pandora on an iPod touch or the radio on the Zune. It's totally unnecessary to "test drive" your music and pay for it.
@Paul
So I can listen to entire albums on the radio now? Awesome! Please let me know what station to dial in for that capability. I'd love to check it out!
Seriously, now -- unless all you care about are the current Top 40 hits, then the radio *alone* is just fine. For the rest of us, though, we enjoy these things called "albums" -- you know... 10 songs, 12 songs, etc... all recorded and packaged together! They're great!
You either "get" the subscription music thing, or you don't. You are a Mac-lovin'-knob, Paul, and thus I'm not surprised that you don't get it. It appears to be your lot in life. Many of us, however, have moved on and realize that subcription-based music is actually cheaper (in the long run) and likely the way things are going.
Paul, your arguments are always all over the place, sometimes I wonder if you are actually for real or just joking around!
1. You say "But if you're paying a subscription every month AND buying songs, what good is the subscription?":
A subscription is there to listen to music that you don't want to spend a full dollar on, For example, I downloaded Eminem's new album from Zune and listened to the whole album, not just a 30 seconds cut but the full songs, then bought one song that I like. Now, anytime I feel like listening to some other songs of the same album that I almost like I could easily go back and listen to the song from my Zune through my PC or WiFi whenever I like. Can't you see how that is awesome?! Maybe it is not what you like: Don't subscribe, just buy the music!
Buying songs is not what the subscription service is all about. This service is something like the Xbox Live Gold account, it is not the music that I only get but I also get along: Social interaction where I can find and set to automatically download music based on some of my friends' taste, I find detailed information about each artist, I get one of the hundreds of free professionally developed playlists that update every week with great music that I would pay or waste so much time doing it myself. I get to use the same account on three different Zunes on three different PCs. I learn more about an artist all in one place within one software.
Do you not see some value to all of that?
2. Then you talk about "That's like having sex with your wife every month for free, while paying to sleep with prostitutes"
To keep it simple, your wife is not a subscription material. Your example is too missed up.
3. Then later you bring up a fake story about some Zune user, comparing the "Radio" to the "Zune Pass".....!
That's comparing Apples to Oranges; At least in a radio station you don't have the choice of downloading your song and playing on any speaker of your choice at the time of your choice, and I can go on with the reasons, but, it isn't even worth it.
Man, why can't you accept things and face the facts? Why do you always have to fake your way or create some nonsense arguments into proving a point?
Paul A. Chapel:
"to get 30,000 songs using Zune Pass's 10 song credit, it would run you $45,000 in Zune Pass subscription fees over 250 years. And that's if you remember to use your 10 song credits every month, because they expire a month later."
Is this a serious statement?
You're not comparing what matters: access to music, not ownership.
"30,000 songs using iTunes: $30,000."
Lifetime (50 years) of unlimited songs, plus 6,000 songs to "keep" (if you really need to): $9,000.
It should be obvious that a subscription service is not a method to buying individual songs to keep -- the 250 year metric is pointless. The 10 songs a month to keep are a bonus (and are merely there as an insurance/incentive), so if you cancel your subscription down the line you're not left with nothing.
In reality, you wouldn't be left with nothing, since you got value each month from your music (you wouldn't say 10 years after buying a gallon of milk that it was all for nothing). Keeping the extra songs is sort of just a psychological extra to get people who are attached to the concept of music ownership to rationalize the subscription service as less risky.
Paul, you say:
"All I'm saying is that people who want to own their music are going to just buy it anyway. People who rent music, are just going to rent it, but it's rare that you're going to see people who do both."
Not really, this isn't what you stated first. The problem with your arguments isn't bad words or wrong grammar but it is the fake stuff that you claim or conclude which boggles the mind. You seem like a guy who likes to talk, but you sometimes over think or really just not think at all before talking.
You always start by denying facts, then disapproving them, followed by fake backing and then a weak outro as if you didn't mean it.
Think man, think a little, share your opinion with at least some real facts after giving it some thought, is that really hard for you?!
@Paul
Look at it this way, $15.00 a month to download and keep any song you want, on top of that, while you are paying $15.00 a month you can download and listen to an unlimited amount of songs.
Downloading the "Hottest" songs on itunes at 10 songs a month would cost $13.00. I realize im using the most expensive songs as an example, but the "Hottest" songs are generally the ones played on the radio, which are apparently the only songs worth listening to with your logic. An extra $2.00 a month to have access to any song seems pretty good to me.
The following statement is really not true at all. I can't believe you actually said "Any song worth listening to on an album is going to be played on the radio" First of all, no. Second, you can't arrange a radio stations playlist, and if you want to hear a certain song, chances are, it wont be played for a while. Third, the quality on the radio isn't so great.
"I had a conversation with a Zunebot..."
You said that you never met anybody with a Zune, but you have had conversations with Zune owners about ZunePass. Which is it, you did or did not meet somebody with a Zune? You should really write these things down so you can keep your lies in order.
As for the "Zunebot" comment - no, you are not a Apple loving, Microsoft hating person, you just report things fairly and with "facts".
You do realize that most people don't listen to thousands of songs, nor do they fill up their music device with that much music from online purchases. You can compare your gigabyte to the dollar all you want. The fact is, it's a rip-off for the majority of users, hence it will never gain the popularity you see with per purchase stores.
A side note, I applaud Microsoft for taking an edge with the OLED screen, further advancing the screen's market. Though, I don't see the marketing sense at the moment. Are most users going to care? No.
Apple made a smart move not differentiating the software from iPhone and the iPod Touch. The problem I foresee with Microsoft's applications market is that they are for a myriad of devices running two different operating systems. Thus is Microsoft must sell the new Zune off-the-shelves to save the application store that has yet to see fruition.
@Paul
Civil discussions usually involve facts, and usually do not involve prostitutes and the chauvinist belief of owning ones wife.
@ Saad
I felt you were right on with the benefits of a subscription service, really hitting one of the lesser known points of community interaction. I had iMesh (the name was around way before iTunes), which allowed you to look at different users profiles, and music they listen to. This was great for finding new music from users with similar tastes.
@Paul
"Any song worth listening to on an album is going to be played on the radio, so why waste $15.00 a month listening to something that you can get for free anyway? That sounds stupid to me."
are you fucking kidding me? there's so many things wrong with this sentence I can't let it go by:
1) so if any song worth listening to on an album is going to be played on the radio, then that means all non-singles in the history of music are not worth listening to.
2) there's commercials on radio
3) on-demand...being able to listen anything you want whenever you want. you can pick exactly what you want to listen to on the radio now? i had no idea! thanks paul!
4) older stuff...most radio stations play recent music, within the last 2 months or so.
there's really just no comparison between the two at all. your "argument" is almost like comparing black & white broadcast tv to netflix...but makes even less sense.
i feel dumber after having read what you said and we are all a little bit worse off in our lives after you decided to type in this thread. may god have mercy on your soul.
@ Sean
I've had my Zune for almost 2 years now and have had the Zune Pass since I got it. I have nearly 30,000 song plays counts. There are also tons of other people who have far more plays than I do and seeing as how rapidly the artist/song/album play counts rise, there are people are lot of people using Zune. So there is a huge chunk of people who play thousands of songs, go poke around last.fm so that statement doesn't stand well.
I don't feel like I'm getting riped-off, I have nearly 8,500 songs at my disposal anytime of day plus the 5 million I can stream if I'm near a hotspot or on a computer. Personally I see the Zune Pass as a HUGE value. With the universal popularity of music, the subscription model can easily work, you just have to get people to understand what it means to use subscription music, their limitations, and their advantages. Zune on Xbox can push the Zune and Zune Pass like crazy if done well.
Slacker Radio/Last.fm/Pandora/et al on my iPhone > ZunePass.
1) They're free (let's see your "financial advisor" address that little factoid, Microsoft).
2) They're effortless.
Squirt Different.
i filled up my 80gb zune with the 15 dollars it costs for a subscription...
@Paul,
As a former Yahoo-to-go subscription user, the Zune Pass is a great deal.
1. Fill up is cheaper than iPod: assuming 50 years more of life: $30K iPod, $15K Zune, not even counting the 6,000 free songs bonus, nor counting that you can constantly swap out songs for fresh ones as your tastes change or boredom sets in.
2. Radio fidelity is bad compared to download.
3. Radio choice in music is bad compared to download. (Radio jocks limited playlist vs. whatever you want.)
OK, you're not a fan of subscription music. But watching Yahoo and orig. Napster having trouble making money on this service at $15/mo., the Zune Pass at $15 - $10 owned music (if you remember to do this each month, as you say) = $5/mo. I suspect Microsoft is losing money on Zune Pass to stimulate the market.