They should stop concentrating on the speed and start concentrating on the resolution. Seriously if you're calling it e-paper people already expect it to be slow; obviously it's not dense enough or fast enough to be primary display technology, so if you're not about to make a new term for not-quite-epaper-and-not-quite-a-monitor screens, you'd have to start socializing the category before you start releasing products in it, otherwise markets aren't going to know what to do with it.
Also do we know the comparative cost per square inch on this versus other e-paper systems or color e-paper systems?
The device is aimed at gamers and TV watchers, generating a 3D image with use of a pair of 0.7-inch OLED panels, which each display separate images, doing away with the ghost imagery that often comes along with 3D displays.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
They should stop concentrating on the speed and start concentrating on the resolution. Seriously if you're calling it e-paper people already expect it to be slow; obviously it's not dense enough or fast enough to be primary display technology, so if you're not about to make a new term for not-quite-epaper-and-not-quite-a-monitor screens, you'd have to start socializing the category before you start releasing products in it, otherwise markets aren't going to know what to do with it.
Also do we know the comparative cost per square inch on this versus other e-paper systems or color e-paper systems?