iPhone 3GS review
By Joshua Topolsky 
posted Jun 17th 2009 2:14PM
posted Jun 17th 2009 2:14PM
Hardware
As we said in the intro, there is nothing visually different about the iPhone 3GS versus the iPhone 3G, save for the lettering on the back, which is now mirrored like the Apple logo. While we had seen leaked images of a matte finish, bezel-free version of the device, when push came to shove, what we got was essentially a carbon copy of the iPhone 3G. In terms of the general elements of the phone -- the plastic casing, mute switch, home and power buttons, etc. -- there is no change at all. In fact, if you were to lay this phone and its predecessor next to one another face up, the new model would be indistinguishable. Of course, the 3GS is not just a clone of the previous device, and Apple has made most of its significant changes inside the phone.
Internals
First off, the company has supercharged the CPU of the 3GS (remember, the S is for speed), jacking up the processor numbers from 412MHz to a rumored 600MHz. Additionally, the RAM is said to have doubled from 128MB to 256MB, the phone is offered with 16GB or 32GB of storage, and Apple has swapped out the previous graphics chip for a new version -- dubbed the PowerVR SGX -- which adds support for more robust visuals via OpenGL ES 2.0. All this should mean that end users will see a noticeable difference in app speeds and loading times (Apple claims an average of 2x faster loads, though since the company has been cagey about upgrade details, it's hard to know what the real differences are).
So, do the revamped insides equal an improved experience on the phone? Kinda.
For our oft-used phone actions -- flicking through homescreens, calling up search terms in Spotlight, scrolling through long lists -- we definitely felt like the 3GS was snappier than its predecessor. It wasn't like the doors were flying off, but there was a noticeable bump in speed, particularly when it came to initial data loads (how quickly you see content pop up within an application). When it came to opening apps which pull lots of that kind of content, like Contacts, Calendar, or Messaging, we saw an even more noticeable improvement. Comparing the 3G and 3GS side-by-side yielded small but absolutely palpable differences -- the 3GS does seem to eliminate quite a few of the hangs we find maddening as we go through our day. It's not the perfect salve, but it's a start.
We're excited by the cranked up CPU, but in our experience you'll see lowered load times (though obviously not as drastic) if you take a standard 3G and do a full restore, so there is the lingering question of whether or not the jacked-up feel of the 3GS will last, or will begin to bog down after months of use and heaps of data.
A spot where we really saw the fruits of Apple's labors (and one we don't expect to decline as you pile on data) was actually in the more graphically intense apps for the phone. Comparing a CPU-hungry 3D game like Resident Evil: Degeneration on the 3GS with the same title 3G yielded striking results. The load time was drastically reduced, and rendering and frame rates on the game were noticeably smoother than on the older device (though game speeds stay the same) -- a side effect of the more powerful guts we'd hoped to see, but weren't sure would be so stark. If you're an avid gamer looking for the device with more power, the difference will be crystal clear: the 3GS obviously flexes in this department.
Display
We mentioned that Apple didn't really make any cosmetic changes to the phone, but that's not entirely accurate. While the 480 x 320 display on the iPhone 3GS is technically identical to its predecessor's screen, it adds one small feature which should make some users extremely happy.
The company has changed the treatment on the surface of the touchscreen, utilizing an oleophobic coating -- essentially a protectant that's highly resistant to fingerprint smudging. For those of you constantly wiping burger grease, WD40, and various other toxic materials from your iPhone, this will come as a tremendous little perk. The most surprising thing about the tech is that it actually does what the company says it will: namely, it resists new smudges and wipes almost entirely clean with a single swipe on a pant leg. This wasn't exactly the most pressing issue we had with the phone, but it's nice to know that Apple is innovating in the dirty screen space.
Camera
A camera tweak is a big deal for iPhone fans -- after all, they've had to suffer through not one, but two iterations of a phone with a paltry 2 megapixel camera, no autofocus, and no flash. Apple has tweaked two out of three here, and as Meat Loaf tells us, that ain't bad. The 3GS upgrades the built-in camera to a 3 megapixel version -- not insanely great, but at least competitive -- and has added an autofocus function with a nifty software tie-in. Instead of having to use a gross physical button to snap your shots, the iPhone continues to rely on its onscreen trigger, but cranks up the use of that big display by allowing you to focus in on subjects based on where you tap. In our experience, the parlor trick actually turned out to be quite useful, accurately zeroing in on what we wanted most of the time. Struggles to focus were minor at best, though you won't be able to do any heavy macro work here, and during video recording you're stuck with a constantly focusing lens -- no tapping allowed.
We do have some complaints about exposure, which seems to be permanently cranked to "blinding," and while the shutter speed is faster than on the 3G, it's still not quite snappy enough for our taste. Hey -- we guess we should just be glad they gave us an extra megapixel, right?
Software
As we said in the opener, the 3GS launch isn't just about the hardware -- in fact, you could argue that it's hardly about the hardware. The biggest changes with this device really come in the form of software tweaks, and to a point, the software tweaks provided by iPhone OS 3.0. Apple really piled on the fixes and additions in its latest OS iteration (the company boasts of 1,000 new APIs for developers), and there's plenty to plow through that up until now has only been the domain of those lucky / hard working few. What's all the fuss about? See below.
We'd like to preface this section by saying that because we're testing a US device, MMS and tethering options are disabled thanks to AT&T's current policies on the services. Obviously, not being able to properly test two of the most anticipated aspects of the new OS is disheartening, and while we could hack a solution to get both working (see here), it's not a reasonable option for most end users right now, and probably wouldn't be fair to include in this review.
On a "brighter" note, AT&T claims it will be delivering MMS to the iPhone come late Summer as part of its standard SMS packages (no word on tethering), though we think it's patently absurd that the second largest carrier in America -- a carrier which currently has MMS enabled for all of its other devices -- is failing to make this available at launch. Judging from the reaction to this news during the WWDC keynote, it would seem that most others agree. Apple included.
Cut, copy, and paste
Of all the features added to the new 3.0 cocktail, copy / paste is easily the most talked about. Perhaps because it was such an obvious feature to leave out to begin with, or perhaps because Apple made it through multiple updates with no change (till now). Regardless, the iPhone line now has the ability to perform one of the most basic tasks known to computing. So how does it fare? Well, it's actually a pretty smart implementation of the process on a mobile device -- one of the best we've seen. To grab a chunk of text, you simply tap on the section you want to grab and the phone tries to figure out just how much you meant to select. Usually it's pretty smart about what you want (sort of the copy / paste version of Apple's predictive text input), but it also gives you anchors to grab on the top, bottom, left, and right of the selection box, allowing you to pull your copy area out as needed. A contextual menu appears above or below your selection, and changes based on what stage of the process you're in. To paste you just tap on an empty spot in a document, and the menu presents itself again. For undoing actions, you shake the phone (cute, but a little annoying -- we would have preferred a menu item).
The beauty here is that unlike competitors such as the Pre or Android, iPhone copy and paste doesn't just let you grab text -- you can grab whole chunks of mixed media, like text and images, and it will copy the content with proper formatting and elements. If you want to pull out a section of a webpage, for instance, the function elegantly allows you to zero in on the area you want to copy and easily transfer it into an email or document without losing any components (unless you're pasting into a text only area, like Notes, which strips out formatting and images).
While we don't think the wait was necessarily justified for a feature so simple (and so necessary), we do think Apple has pulled off a tremendously useful implementation of the process. It's the kind of thing you'll miss once you go to another device without such broad and universal functionality.
Push notifications
Way back in June of 2008, Apple promised that we'd see push notifications -- instantaneous alerts for emails, messages, and other app-related notices -- due in an OS update come that September. Needless to say, the fall came and went without so much as a mention of the software addition. Earlier this year, Apple showed off the functionality again at the iPhone OS 3.0 preview, combatting arguments for true multitasking within the iPhone operating system by saying push would not only work as a surrogate for most background tasks, but would allow the devices to retain sufficient battery life. Background tasks, Apple warned us, create a drain on power that would have users running for their chargers far too often.
So -- do push notifications take the place of background tasks? Do they give the end-user the feeling of constant connectedness the way Apple seems to intend them to? In our experience, not quite. At the time of this writing, there are only a few apps actually employing the service, though we're sure more will come. Overall, where push is really useful is in receiving updates or messages -- individual pings which direct your attention towards a particular application -- but they don't keep you in the stream of information the way an AIM session running in the background does. Yes, you get alerted to new messages (or in the case of something like Tap Tap Revenge, challenges), but those appear as either one of the iPhone's annoying pop-ups, or as a background audio notification coupled with a growing message counter for a particular app (AIM for instance). The service is extremely useful, and we're happy that Apple is endeavoring to make it available for all of its developers, but from a practical perspective, it doesn't feel that different than an email notification or a calendar event. In short, it will help you stay connected, but it won't take the place of true multitasking, and unless Apple finds a less obtrusive notification solution, it could actually create quite a mess. Besides those obvious issues, we're still not seeing push for the things we really want, namely, Gmail. We don't know when (or if) a rollout of said feature is planned, but we're guessing it can't be too far off for a device which now has central functionality orbiting around this feature.
Ultimately, we still feel strongly that true multitasking can't be replaced by these notifications, and if there's anything we learned from using the Pre, it's that background tasks can be handled elegantly without a mind-blowing hit to battery life. For a company which prides itself on advanced battery tech, you'd think instead of shying away from the challenge, Apple would be looking for ways to innovate in this space.
Spotlight
We've got to hand it to Apple -- the company has really answered the call when it comes to search functionality on the iPhone. The addition of Spotlight to the iPhone OS is quite notable for two reasons: first, it gives you homescreen access to a full search of all your content on the device, including notes, email, contacts, calendar events, and applications. Secondly, it provides new search functionality within mail that not only lets your get at downloaded messages, but extends the hooks into server-side content. That's a bit of a stunner, as we can't count the number of times we've needed to fish some info from an email that had long moved outside of our 200 message limit (and what's up with that anyway Apple?). Spotlight searching works flawlessly in email, but we have a few gripes about the phone-facing implementation.
To start with, in order to navigate to your Spotlight screen, you have to either assign the home button double-tap shortcut to take you to the search window, swipe back when you're in homescreen view, or single tap once to get to your first page, then again to get into Spotlight. It all seems a bit complicated to us -- what would have made more sense was some kind of universal gesture... like maybe that long home button press reserved for Voice Control (more on that in a bit). Another problem is that you still have to jump through multiple hoops to get to the content you're looking for, particularly with contacts. Once you bring up a name, you have to actually jump into the contact card to call or send a text message -- why isn't this info accessible from the search window? As with a lot of processes on the phone, you still feel like you're clicking through way, way too many screens to get where you need to be.
Video recording / editing
(Here's a link to the raw video file shot with the 3GS)
Okay -- you got us. Video recording on the iPhone 3G S is really quite impressive, and there are two reasons why. For starters, the phone handles pretty fantastic looking VGA video at 30 FPS, which makes for not just passable mobile video, but usable mobile video. The size, clarity, and smoothness of the sequences we shot looked tremendous to our eyes -- certainly on par if not outclassing many of the contenders in this space. In our opinion, the 3GS video quality is high enough that we'd consider this a viable stand-in for lower end camcorders or flip cams -- if you want to capture your kids at the park but don't want to come packing a ton of gear, this produces totally reasonable results.
The second reason we're a fan of the 3GS video functionality is simple: editing. After you snap some video, you can easily pull out just the section you want to use in a kind of dumbed down iMovie edit window, which gives you a timeline of your clip, replete with a preview of the action. You can long-press on the section you're editing to see a more detailed view, and you can pull either the start or end points to snag just the section you want. We love the fact that you can grab and cut video in-phone without having to offload anywhere else, but we'd love it even more if OS 3.0 allowed for non-destructive editing of the clips. As it is now, once you cut something down, you're done -- there's no way to retrieve the full length version of the video. We're hoping in future version Apple gives users either the option to retain the deleted sections, or at least the option to copy the clip over to a new file. We wouldn't scoff at an option to splice or merge multiple clips together either, but we don't want to break the bank with our lofty requests.
One other nice feature that's been tacked on the video tool is the ability to auto-compress and upload to YouTube, MobileMe (a 45 second video took about three minutes to up over WiFi), or send a .MOV in an email. If we had a device that could actually utilize MMS, there's an option for that as well.
Voice Control
Voice Control is a bit like an answer to a question that no one asked. The basic premise is that Apple has given 3GS owners the ability to control their phone via simple voice commands, relayed through a glitzy Voice Control homescreen (which is accessed by holding down the home button for a few seconds). As you issue commands, the screen provides fly-bys of possible actions, ostensibly to make the process a bit easier on those with a blown short term memory. In practice, the application performed admirably when we made specific requests, whether it was dialing contacts, or playing a particular band -- though it wasn't without its hang-ups. The first problem we encountered is that it would sometimes just mishear us altogether, for instance, we asked it to "play M83" and it thought we wanted to listen to a playlist called "Pre" (oh the irony). Another irksome behavior is that you can ask Voice Control things like what song is currently playing, but after telling you, the app closes itself, forcing you to reopen if you want to change the track or perform another action. This seems like weird UI design to us -- why wouldn't Voice Control stay open until we were ready to close it? We also discovered that the range of options for voice activated functions are quite limited -- if you want to do anything beyond controlling music playback or making calls, you're pretty much out of luck.
There's clearly a lot of use for something like this when driving or working on something which keeps your hands away from your phone, though you still have to engage the app physically, so we're not sure how much you'd get out of it in those situations. The whole concept seems something very much in the vein of Cover Flow -- a really impressive component for the phone that just doesn't have a ton of practical use. Yes, your friends will think it's pretty cool, but as a pragmatic group of gadget nerds, we don't see a tremendous need for this functionality. Perhaps Apple will give it a little more undercarriage work in future versions of the OS, because we see lots of interesting places they could take it.
Compass / Google Maps
It may seem like an odd choice, but Apple decided to stick a proper compass inside the 3G S. At first we were a little perplexed by the addition, since we've gotten in this weird habit of expecting bolder moves from the company. Still, in practice the inclusion of a hardware compass is actually really helpful when it comes to doing things like navigating a new city. As far as the hardware is concerned, the compass seems to do what's promised with pretty impressive accuracy.
The Compass app itself, viewed as a standalone product, doesn't really do much for us. We rarely have a need to know which direction we're facing or where north is in relation to where we're standing -- it's just not a piece of data we typically use. The combination of Google Maps and the compass, however, is a powerful marriage that could put an end to many of your navigation woes. Within Maps, you now have the option to not only locate your position via GPS, but orient the map to the direction you're facing. Once the compass picks up your bearing, it rotates the map to reflect. This may not sound like much, but if you've ever tried to walk a new city using just maps and geolocation, you'll understand quickly. Being able to not only see your surrounding landmarks, but how they relate to you from a directional standpoint is incredibly useful, and we found ourselves reaching for the help often with the 3GS. One sour note was that you're not treated to the same reality-bending feat of using the compass while in street view (as Android does -- always great at parties), though it's a minor complaint. We can't say what extended functionality the compass will hold, but the pairing with GMaps here is enough to make it a worthy addition in our opinion.
Landscape keyboard, Nike+, A2DP, further thoughts on iPhone OS 3.0
There are lots of little odds and ends, improvements both small and large, in the iPhone OS 3.0. At the time of this writing, anyone with an iPhone or iPhone 3G should be able to download and test most of them, but we wanted to give a brief overview / opinion on the ones that stood out to us.
The first big one that stands out is the extension of a landscape keyboard to all of the main applications in Apple's arsenal. That means you now have access to the more spacious layout in Mail, Notes, Messages, etc. There are a lot of users out there who were hoping this day would come, and we'll admit, our typing accuracy definitely goes up when we bust out the broader keyboard. Like copy and paste, this is probably an addition that should have been part of the package right out of the gate, but better late than never guys.
Another addition is the inclusion of Nike+ for the 3GS. The app itself is identical to the version which we've already seen for the iPod touch, but it's now in convenient iPhone form. We don't know about you, but carrying around the iPhone for a jog doesn't seem like the best option to us (then again, we don't know if carrying around a touch is preferable). Still, we won't knock Apple for trying to cram as much functionality into this thing as possible -- this is a welcome addition.
And for those wondering about A2DP -- it's here, and it works flawlessly. Testing things out with the Motorola ROKR S9-HD yielded a simple pairing right out of the gate, and the sound quality was excellent. We thought we'd never see the day where Apple came around to a stereo Bluetooth profile, but it's here, and it's fantastic.
It's clear that Apple has taken great pains to listen to users and go over the OS with a fine tooth comb -- you see the company's careful work in places like the call log (which now shows much more detailed info on callers), upgrades to standard apps like Stocks, and the thoughtfulness of adding oft-requested features like voice memo recording. We're not saying Apple has gotten kind and gentle, but the company does seem more kind and more gentle as it insinuates itself into the mainstream.
Battery life, pricing, wrap-up
Battery life
Apple claimed that the battery life on the 3GS is somehow better than what we've previously seen on the 3G, but in our tests, we could barely tell the difference between the two handsets. First off, in terms of talktime and data over a 3G network, the count is exactly the same (five hours) -- though the battery gains two hours (up from 10 to 12) using 2G. Where the differences really show according to Apple are during strictly WiFi, video, or audio use. The claim is that you'll see roughly three to four more hours of life out of the device in those scenarios, but honestly, if you're just using this thing to play audio, why did you bother getting an iPhone? In our tests -- real world, admittedly non-scientific tests -- we hardly noticed a difference in battery life between the new and old model. The point is, you're still very much in the same boat when it comes to general use -- but on the plus side, there's no noticeable deficit in power with the new version (though we have yet to see what heavy video capture does to a full charge).
Pricing
As with any phone, the big, highlighted number you see advertised left and right for the iPhone 3GS -- $199 for the 16GB version and $299 for the 32GB -- is the new contract price, which means there are plenty of thick, barbed strings attached. If you're still using a RAZR from 2006 and you haven't touched your service or bought a new phone directly from the carrier since then, you're almost certainly in business with these maximum subsidies; AT&T's made its money off of you several times over and it's willing to put a little dough back in your pocket once again in order to get a whole lot more out of you over the course of a contract. On the flipside, customers who have been upgrading religiously from iPhone to 3G to 3GS will not necessarily be eligible for those most lucrative prices unless they paid the off-contract price for their 3G (to avoid re-upping the contract they were already on) and are now out of contract altogether -- unless AT&T says otherwise, of course. More on that next.
If you're what AT&T calls "ineligible," you have a a few options. The company has taken the very unusual step of letting iPhone 3G customers who are becoming upgrade eligible in the next three months through the end of September (note that this can be, and usually is, different from the date that your contract is up) can take advantage of the fully subsidized pricing. The way your upgrade eligibility date is an inexact science, involving Magic 8-Balls, mainframes from the 1960s, and faerie dust, but the bottom line is that you need to check with the carrier to find out when that date is (you can see it using online account management -- no need to call in).
You can always add a line, assuming you clear the usual battery of credit checks, which would also get you back in the game for $199 / $299 -- the tradeoff being that you're stuck with another line of service, of course, which ends up significantly outweighing any subsidy advantage upfront by the time your new contract has run its course. If you want to upgrade your existing line early, you can do so for $399 or $499 for the 16GB or 32GB model, respectively, and for contract breakage newbies, that can definitely be an unwelcome shock to the wallet. Even folks who upgraded from the original iPhone to the 3G and don't become eligible in the next few months won't much appreciate what's going on here, since they'd essentially paid "full price" for the first model which allowed AT&T to offer the 3G at maximum subsidy provided customers re-upped their contracts. At any rate, keep in mind that buying in at these $399 / $499 price points will extend your contract back to two years, because -- believe it or not -- they're still slightly discounted. If you want to buy a 3G S outright without the moral and financial dilemma of signing your name to a very pricey piece of paper, get ready for the big bucks: $599 or $699, depending on the model you choose.
It can all be a little confusing, yes -- and if you aren't upgrade eligible or have questions about your individual situation, your best bet is to go into a store; representatives can typically work magic on your account that you can't work yourself through AT&T's website.
Wrap-up
There are probably two very large groups of people thinking about buying an iPhone right now. One set is current users, either those with the 3G, or those still using the original model. The other set is a group of new users -- people who've never owned an iPhone and are now faced with not one, but two different options when it comes to getting in the door. For both groups, there are huge questions to answer about whether or not getting the 3GS makes sense, and very few of them have to do with the quality of the phone.
For current users, we have this to say: the iPhone 3GS is a solid spec bump to a phone you already own... but it is, at its core, a phone you already own. Your real deciding factors will be two-fold, first, are you able to purchase the 3GS at a price which is reasonable or sensible to you? For a lot of current users -- particularly more recent customers -- the pricing will be exorbitant, and it's hard to think of dropping $399 or $499 when you've just shelled out for a very, very similar phone (remember, you're paying for a speed bump, a compass, and video recording). On the other hand, if you're within contract renewal range and you don't plan on jumping platforms anytime soon, $199 nabs you an unquestionably excellent smartphone.
That conclusion speaks to new users who are undecided about the iPhone (or exactly which iPhone to buy). At this stage, we wouldn't recommend anything but the 3GS for newcomers planning on getting into Apple's game. For another $100, you're nabbing a much more robust device with a handful of great additions. It's a small price to pay for something you plan to keep long term -- or until Apple pops the next iteration on us. The other big questions here aren't about the 3G or 3GS -- they're about Apple's platform and AT&T's network. While the smartphone market has cracked wide open lately, the iPhone is arguably the market leader (at least in mindshare), and really does showcase a superb platform -- lack of physical keyboard and multitasking aside. AT&T, on the other hand, isn't exactly acting like the top-tier carrier it's supposed to be, and its service can sometimes be maddeningly poor.
So while it's tough to argue with the package Apple has put together (a stellar device with just enough new to make it nearly perfect), we couldn't help feeling a bit let down by the 3GS. Maybe we've been spoiled by devices like the Pre and Ion (and it's possible we're a little numb to OS 3.0 since we've played with the beta for a while now), but the additions of video recording, a compass, and a speed bump just don't seem that compelling to us. The mix of new features and a ever-growing App Store will still be potent to new buyers -- but pricing schemes which amount to hundreds more for current owners might give previous early adopters and eager upgraders reason for pause. Ultimately we're not saying it's time to jump ship, but we've come to expect a bit more pedal to the floor from Apple -- you've raised the bar guys, now it's time to jump over it.
Beauitful
Great phone, great update. I only wish they would have added a camera to the iPod touch. What a seller that would have been!
iPods (including the Touch) get updated in the fall. I have no doubt that iPod Touch version 3 is coming in September.
Why the hell OS 3.0 isn't out yet ???
Mine is in Shenzhen, China. :(
Shamwow guy says, "Made in China, you know the Chinese always make good stuff."
that may still happen... in September.
Man it's the come-back... This is pretty much a hook... The software update that's being release should of been out when the phone was originally released... This upgrade is more software based because Apple/ATT has a deal for one hardware refresh a year... Additionally, there will not be any exclusive agreement next year so Apple is saving the major hardware upgrade for the bigger open US market next year...
Don't worry. The camera will most likely come to the touch at an event closer to back to school or holiday. Hopefully they will announce a larger tablet also at that time.
You hear that everybody. The iPhone doesn't use a "gross" physical button to take pictures because Apple and the iPhone know how cameras should work. You got that Nikon and Canon? Quickly remove all those shutter buttons from your cameras immediately...
:sigh:
Still haven't implemented scrolling text for playlists and currently playing songs...
True that.
I can do without the Compass and Video Recording - and the 2MP photos are easier to email than the 3.2MP photos.
The most graphic intensive game I play is Galaxy on Fire which works pretty well on my own phone.
I really doubt I'll jump for the 3GS unless they show me something I absolutely can't do without. All I really want is tethering.
no true multitasking???
EPIC FAIL
well, at least it finally has copy + paste. what a joke.
Hey 00000, I think your sarcasm detector is broken
touch pro had everything well before and even my 8525 did years ago except for the compass but who cares
oo and i have a keyboard and a higher res screen soo thats settled
I'm having trouble figuring out which phone to buy PALM PRE or IPHONE 3GS? Can anyone help me out here? As far as I can tell, it looks like this:
IPHONE IS LACKING BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING:
No multitasking
No Physical keyboard
No LED flash
PALM PRE IS LACKING BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING:
8 GB memory limit
No true apps - only webapps (so weak)
No voice and data at the same time (because of Sprint CDMA network)
No voice dialing (WTF)
No video recording (WTF?)
No voice memos (WTF)
No movie rentals (over the air or otherwise)
No visual Voicemail
No TV show rentals
No audiobook purchasing
No true app store (18 is a joke)
No console-quality games (like Resident Evil, Metal Gear, 1000's of others for iPhone)
No Peer to Peer games
No VoiceOver (the iPhone can read any screen to you, just like a Mac)
No native in-car integration (iPhone has this with dozens of cars)
No podcasts
Crippled copy/paste (for example - you can't cut or copy a webpage or any part of it)
No universal search (crippled - no e-mail search)
Tiny keyboard (iPhone landscape and portrait keyboards are bigger than Pre's real keyboard)
No auto wi-fi login (just jumps on any open network and remembers them all)
No 7.2 Mbps network speed
No Remote Wipe
No Find My Phone feature
Can't function as a Remote for the household stereo (Great for parties, especially with the iTunes DJ feature where people can request songs)
Weak battery life
More expensive than iPhone
Very scratchable screen
No oleophobic protective screen
No real music store (Apple can break the compatibility at any time and I don't want to take that chance)
No Voice Commands (control music playing by saying "Depeche Mode" for example)
No Compass
No multiple and customizable home screens like iPhone (Pre only has one screen)
No Parental Controls
No Video Editing
No onboard Ringtone Creation
No 5 person conference calls
No Webclips
Anyone have anything to say about this? Can anyone honestly say the Pre has more features?
PS - the iPhone CAN multitask - you can listen to music, send e-mails, download files, AND surf the web at the same time. What you CANNOT do is have multiple 3rd party apps open at the same time - for example, I can't play Boggle AND Texas Holdem at the same time. And why would I? However, I CAN play Boggle, listen to my music, answer an email, download a PDF, etc. at the same time.
I would honestly like someone to list several dozen features the Pre has that the iPhone doesn't have. I guarantee no one will.
Agreed. They need to refine the iPod Touch line
Correction. SAME phone, decent OS upgrade.
It must really be tough for Apple to make a perfect smartphone even more perfect but they managed to do it. Bow down to the king.
Wow.
This guy listed a whole bunch of stuff that the Pre lacks and not a single person can refute him. All you guys did was call him names.
I guess the truth hurts.
I love that list and i'm gonna post it elsewhere if you don't mind, dude.
I, too, would like to seee if anyone here can refute this iphone list.
Nice things that I'm slowly noticing so far in 3.0:
-When you click on the App Store, the 'Update' tab is hidden in the 'More' tab. This may seem annoying, but it ends the habit of directly going to the 'Update' tab when you first fire up the App Store because it never finds any updates that way. You have to quickly choose another tab first as it starts up.
-You can now see Artist/Album information when you double-press the home button when iPhone is locked. Also, the song text is smaller so you can see the entire song information without the trailing periods (for e.g. "The Great Song By..").
-You can now read reviews for iTunes items now! Yay! Finally. You could do it only for App Store items before.
That's all I'm seeing so far. I know all the 3.0 beta testers probably know about this. Hehe.
@Bob
For people to refute that nice list that someone actually felt they needed to specify in minute detail about how the device is not an iPhone (seriously, even if everything listed was in the Pre, people would STILL make lists detailing how much "better" the iPhone is)
I love how people seriously expect Palm, or any other company for that matter, to:
* not only make a device that so closely follows the iPhone's specs that people would just end up idiotically screaming "they couldn't come up with their own idea! they had to copy Apple!"
* also to instantly have a complete application store that has all the apps currently on Apple's app store plus more.
Cause you know, a platform who's existence has only been known for about 6 months, not to mention only been available for about 2 weeks or so would OBVIOUSLY have more customers, support, and content available than a platform that has been in wide availability for about 2 years. Don't forget, when the iPhone was first released, it also was limited to web-type apps (but even then, apparently, that was the greatest thing since sliced bread as well right?) and the SDK has been available for quite some time too. Palm is still finalizing their SDK.
Looks like AT&T not only subsidizes smugness but blind, unrealistic expectations as well.
It is funny that only when a new iPhone is released that the apple fanboys come to know what they actually were missing.
The sluggish iPhone 3G was always fast for the Apple fanboys. I wonder why apple even cared to release iPhone 3G S. iPhone is a heavily hyped crap gadget like all other apple products. The most basic features are still being waited for. The only good apple product is iPod Touch which had a good price vs. performance ratio and no real competition. Palm Pre will kill the iPhone soon.
@ Ken Weaver
Even though you don't deserve it, as your thick headed skull won't be penetrated and your opinion won't be swayed (like most Apple Fanboys), I'll do what you asked for.
First off, lemme say this: I use both PC and Mac. I have owned an iPhone and used it for quite some time, along with an iPod touch. I learned the ins and outs of the iPhone OS. I use PC's only because I can not afford a Macbook. But I have used Mac OS X extensively through school.
The iPhone is touted as a multimedia device, and is therefore marketed as such. A play thing. Marketed to the masses. 50,000 apps, most of which are games and other widgets that replace things that can be looked up on the web (ie, stocks, twitter, weather, converter, etc.). It's simplicity is also appealing. While I am a Sprint customer, I naturally was drawn to the Pre. And another reason is that it was made to get stuff done (like its child company Nextel's motto). It's multitasking engine, along with the way it gets stuff from the web through synergy (not to mention its keyboard) is made for doing things and maximizing downtime.
Your points on what the Pre doesn't have (when compared to the holy Jesus iPhone):
8 GB memory limit - Didn't the 1st generation iPhone have this as well? This is the 1st Gen Pre.
No true apps - only webapps - Same argument for the 1st Gen iPhone. And there are true apps: Match, Pandora, Nascar, Flixter, GoPayment, Classic, Craigslist, Bank of America, etc.... this is only the beginning.
No voice and data at the same time -This is a CDMA limitation unfortunately. I have never found a need for it anyway while on the road, and while in range of an indoor WiFi network, I can have the same benefits.
No voice dialing - I'm sure that this will come in time in an update. Again, it took iPhone OS 3.0 for it to emerge.
No video recording - Coming soon. See above.
No voice memos - See above.
No movie rentals - This is something you're gonna use like what, once? A phone is to make calls. Again, the Pre is more of a business device, while the iPhone is a multimedia device, and more of a status phone than an actual smartphone.
No visual Voicemail - Not too sure if I miss this a lot from AT&T. Traditional Voicemail is, well traditional. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Also, check out www.youmail.com for Visual Voicemail similar service.
No TV show rentals - look above at movie rentals. The Pre can always stream content from the web.
No audiobook purchasing - um, Amazon store?
No true app store (18 is a joke) - App catalog is in is incipient stages. The App Store has had a year to mature. This is similar to picking on a newborn pretty much.
No console-quality games - Nothing yet. Again, a phone is to make calls. It's nice that the iPhone has this feature, but what happens when you drain your battery playing 'console-quality' games and you can't call 911 in an emergency? Leave the gaming to Sony and Nintendo. Tetris and other simple games are fine for me (take a look at the Top selling games in the App store and tell me how many are 'console-quality').
No Peer to Peer games - Oh yea, cuz I'm totally going to wanna play a stranger on the metro/subway in a game that he might not have. Or a friend. Easy way to get that precious device stolen.
No VoiceOver -I haven't seen proof of this. But I can see this being useful in the car for SMS and email messages. That's a good one if it is indeed true.
No native in-car integration - via the iPod cable? Ok ok. Micro usb (USB in general) is a bigger standard though. As well as BT.
No podcasts - Pre can support and play podcasts.
Crippled copy/paste - For now. Again, it took the iPhone the 3rd iteration - the Pre had functionality out of the box.
No universal search - um, yes there is. Go to the email app, or if not, wait for an OTA update (zing!)
Tiny keyboard - Better than having to look at a screen to type...touch typing ftw.
No auto wi-fi login -Proof of this? Most devices have auto wifi login....
No 7.2 Mbps network speed - AT&T's 3G sucks even compared to my EVDO Rev. A on my MOGUL. This is in CT though, your mileage might vary.
No Remote Wipe - Um, yes there is. Palm Profile supports this
No Find My Phone feature - This is laughable at best.
Can't function as a Remote for the household stereo - How often have you actually used this? Also, I can use VNC or a remote client to control my stereo if possible (logmein.com anyone?)
Weak battery life - Not bad for a multitasking phone with a smaller battery. It will only get better with OTA updates (zing again!)
More expensive than iPhone - Not at all. $199 with new contract, and $449 (correct me on this) no contract.
Very scratchable screen - Take care of your shit. 'Nuff said.
No oleophobic protective screen - Isn't this a repeat? Honestly you're just fishing for 'features' here now.
No real music store - The Pre can use iTunes, WMP, Winamp, Musicmatch, AND drag and drop. Pre=infiniti: iPhone=1
No Voice Commands - Meh. I'll give you that. But probably won't be used much.
No Compass - A MUST HAVE FEATURE (sarcasm)
No multiple and customizable home screens like iPhone - Um, what? Icon wise? The Pre can move icons around too, woohoo...at least we have a background that's not only shown on the lock screen....
No Parental Controls - Cuz your kids are going to be playing with your phone that much.
No Video Editing - Maybe an app for this will come to the Pre soon along with Video recording. Then again, this is crippled on the iPhone too (destructive editing).
No onboard Ringtone Creation - Proof of this on the iPhone? Non-jailbreak please?
No 5 person conference calls - Proof?
No Webclips - WTF is that?
I think Brandon dashed that list of Ken's pretty well. That being said, there are a lot of wild comments from iPhone lovers and haters around here. The iPhone isn't killing the Pre and the Pre won't kill the iPhone, and the world will continue to spin like it did yesterday - so get real folks. Maybe put more time into enjoying your devices and less into hating the others.
I have the 1st gen iPhone still and was waiting for this new one before upgrading, because yes, I like my phone. Yet, the updates here are not that exciting and I really am not seeing anything that blows the earlier models out of the water. The 1st gen phone works fine with all the software updates, and the addition of a compass and a few other little perks just doesn't make the upgrade seem needed. So, in that respect, I am pretty disappointed this time around. I really was hoping for a little more from Apple here.
Hmmm.. nevermind my previous post. I thought the Update button moved in the App Store to 'More'. I was wrong. My bad. *scratches head*
ken weaver, brandon just burned you to a crisp! someone call the fire truck!
OMG yes! Thank you so much Mr. Jobs! 2009 and 3mp camera with no stylus, well this sums it up.
My Iphone 3Gs hangs. Very very disappointed with it. Screen blacked out after one day of use hence not allowing me to receive calls. My display does not show(becomes black) sometimes and the starts working after some time.
I think the video will be included in the next version of iPod touch.
Sounds like WIN to me...
Now just have to wait for it.....
Already sold my touch and HTC Touch Pro for this baby.
Sorry but this phone will dominate all the other phones. The Apple haters will have to continue their wait for the long awaited "iPhone killer" savior of theirs....
*fap* *fap* *fap*
What's that sound? Oh.. I see.. its just TheLionOfAssalle.
^^^^^^^^Sounds like jealousy from another iPHone hater
>> Sorry but this phone will dominate all the other phones.
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
One phone to rule them all?
Yeah this sounds like a device that will rule them all.
It only took the THIRD version of the software to to be......
"a major jump from previous versions of the system software featuring highly sought after features like cut, copy, and paste, stereo Bluetooth, MMS, tethering, video recording, landscape keyboard"
All features that most any user would EXPECT right out of the gate from a smartphone.
Looks like RIM is still ruling them all, and I would expect it to stay that way for a while.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/17/technology/rim_blackberry_preview/index.htm?postversion=2009061710
Im sorry, but its taking them three tries to have cut, copy and paste, and a video camera? and what if i want to take a picture at night? oh well.. this phone cant really do that... but i can find north! it STILL isnt what it should be for the price.
As long as it's exclusive to just ATT i'm sorry that won't happen. Its a nice phone and all but I personally refuse to pay 300 more a year for the same type of plan just to have a phone. AT&T is the biggest weakness for this device they not the largest or most dependable 3G or voice and yet they want you to pay so much to just have this phone on their network with restrictions...
As a side note this whole Apple vs MS vs Everybody else is silly. Blackberry has just as many devoted fans as apple maybe even more they just don't feel the need to rub their phone in everybody's face. Palm also has a fanbase that is slowly returning most just waiting for the pre or pre like device to be offered on other carriers. If you like apple products that fine do you but stop acting like you superior to everybody else. There will be no Iphone killer just like Iphone will never kill off the blackberry or others and you should hope not competition is what makes better products for us all.
your right man the iphone owns all...by the way Im on my bold right now listening to Pandora downloading an attachment and replying to a text...your iphone can multi task...right?
Bold FTW
What??? RIM has 55% of US market share compared to Almighty Apple's 19%?! Tell me it isn't so. What happened? Isn't the JesusPhone supposed to kill RIM? Apple's domination? C'mon Apple fanatics you gotta do better than that. Those huge line-ups in front of stores, the marketing, the hype, the propaganda weren't enough. Get out there and buy as many JesusPhones as you can afford Apple nation!
I agree with WickedEast. I personally own 6 iPhone 3Gs purely on principle.
Apple isn't just concentrating on the hardware for mobile phone market, they have created an ecosystem for the iPhone. iPhone itself can't survive the competition, if you just compare the hardware of iPhone to others, there are sure many other better ones out there.
It's the ecosystem that Apple has created to allow iPhone to survive and surpass other mobile phone makers. Nokia is currently the only company that designs their phone and own the Symbian OS. Google Android is similar the M$ business model which they develop the OS but they don't design their own hardware.
See if you can find any app store within other cell phones that contain more than 50,0000+ innovative apps. None of the mobile phones on the market even in Japan contain that many software for a single core device especially within 2 years since launch.
Finally, Apple is ahead of the rest of the mobile phone market. Just when every other company is trying hard to copy Apple to create their app store interface, Apple has just released the API for dev to interface their piece of hardware officially without hacking. That means there are almost infinite possibility for iPhone to expand.
I agree that iPhone's hardware isn't that impressive especially the 3MP camera and no flash. It took them 2 years to have all the standard features that other smartphones have but little bit better; however, Apple is very new to the mobile phone market, they are obviously using a totally different strategy to compete to the rest of the handset makers. When other handset makers are concentrating on competing hardware features such as camera, 3D accelerator, music, etc, Apple is thinking beyond that business model and move on to an ecosystem of how to integrate a mobile communication device into every part of our daily lives via apps store and 3rd party hardware interfacing just like a computer. We know that Nokia has tried to do that, but not really successful due to the interface design is too business and geeky even for the N97. Apple has done a great job to capture the market world wide. Many people move from their Razr to iPhone without experiencing any other smartphones. It is the trend that cell phones are not just phones for talking but pocket computers that integrate into every single detail of our lives.
if the kids at Joystiq hate you what makes you think you'll do better here?
@ shinrajp:
Yep, keep fapping yourself buddy. Doesn't change the fact that RIM completely trounced Apple's smartphone market share in the past year.
@gary- "Well, okay, you're not privy to all the new shit, so uh, you know, but that's what you visit ENGADGET for.." nice one on the lebowski.
i ordered a 3gs as my keyboard just friggin' died. ...i hated the last bold (havn't tried the new one, hated typing on the last version but it's still damn FAT for my pocket) and was not happy with omnia hd being symbian. the announcement of the omnia 2 the day after ordering steamed me a bit i have to admit. multitask would be a huge thing for me, but then again, how well does it work? i don't have the experience with newer smartphones but it used to just plain suck anyway. as long as things open and close quickly, i think i will be fine without the multi tasking. i hope.......
secondly, this sucks as this phone is a 2.5, not a 3 release. it just fixes everything that was wrong/missing in the first place. and as i understand it, i'm still losing mms for a while. bullshit. my nokia 3300 "taco phone" used to do this forever and a day ago. ridiculous. i'm no big fan of the jesus phone, but it did the things i wanted in a phone minus the multi tasking. i would however, like to know from any 3g phone owners out there if there is a way to wipe off all text from the back of the phone without marring the shiny back so there is no advertisement of what it is. i hate free advertising and i am no apple dweeb. nor a windows dweeb for that matter. for the first time i may buy a macbook, but that's because of the unibody and the ability to run either OS.
next thing is, apple ordered phones are shipping and on HOLD? my att ordered phone has not changed status since i ordered on monday. getting worried that it may not arrive till after the weekend and like i said, my phone is F@$Ked! any one who pre ordered ATT had a status change on your order yet? thanks.
I also pre-ordered my 3G S from AT&T and nope, nothing has changed since I placed the order. It would really suck if they don't ship it out tomorrow and wait until the 19th to SHIP it. As it stands now, I really doubt that even with Priority Overnight (it never takes the time they say) that it will get to most people on the 19th.
@WickedEast
While RIM may have 55% of the market share and Apple only has 19%, think about how long RIM has been around and how many phones the market. RIM currently has 4 new phones on the market while Apple only has one (now two). Apple only stated sellling phone 3 years ago while RIM has been in the market for 10 years.
2nd !!!
FAILnd !!!
47th!
oh.
oh wait.....
u got it.....
To put it simply and in fewer words. LET the engadget fanboi war start !!!
Why, we already have our phones. Not much to talk about that hasn't already been said. Plus this phone as states is basically the same thing.
@ Templarian
I totally agree with you, but wait until some of the "famous" faces of engadget show up bashing all platforms (it doesn't matter which) in all directions
I can Multitask and send MMS with my PRE RIGHT NOW. I am better than the iPhone. Thankssssssss
Anil: Let me know when you can take movies with your Pre, and when you get over 50,000 apps available for it. Thanks. Oh, and when it gets an iPod built into it.
LOL prophesy fulfilled !!!! As was foretold fanboi raging war will break with this review. Continue now "civilized intellectuals"!
How come you cant accept that its an iPod when iTunes can?
The iPhone had 0 available apps to purchase at launch. Hell, it took a year before it got an app to purchase. Shove that 50,000 app number up your ass.
NICE!!
Even the Price is NICE !
No, the price really isn't nice. Even the contract price, since then you're stuck with paying an excessive monthly fee.
The majority of people really can't afford to pay that much for a phone, even if that phone is *sort of* a lousy digicam, *sort of* a crippled gaming handheld, *sort of* a crippled computer, wrapped into one. That's because you're forking out around as much as paying for separate *good* devices. It's just not economically sound, except if you're into the coolness and fashion aspect (for that, anything goes).
Get it to around $499 or less *without* contract (for the 32GB... really, 16GB of fast flash costs the *consumer*
I see the percentage of batterly life left next to the battery.. thats new!!!
Yes, how did he get that there? I've been on the dev GM seed for a week and I don't have it. The interweb says that it is supposedly only a feature of the 3Gs... Can someone clarify? I would really like that feature on my 3G.
Fanboys need to get laid. To each his own.
a bit let down? More like MAJOR SCREW UP!
3.2mp cam and no multitasking in 2009!?!!!!!
FAIL Iphone 3G S(tupid).
It has to be an ass-kissing review, if Engadget wants to be invited to any Apple special events in the future. Didn't you know that people who report the truth about Apple products get blacklisted?
I gave up on Engadget and Gizmodo for the truth relating to Apple months ago. The only honest website out there these days is iLounge.
LoL yeah...but come on. engadget KNOWS they are big apple suck-up's. people have mentioned it time and time again, and they are proud of it rather than being pissed or anything!
@Cash -- Did you read our review? Maybe you should.
@Cash just got editor-in-chief-pwned
@ cash - come on, it was a balanced review. In fact they straight up say "don't buy the 3GS if you have the 3G". Sounds fair to me.
He probably did read the review. You guys are way too easy on the device. If Palm had released their same aged OS with their same aged hardware design, only slightly faster, you guys would have ripped them a new one and even posted a letter to Palm on the front page. Maybe you should do the same for Apple, encouraging them to innovate again.
@niteninja4 -- Don't think we're quite there yet. The iPhone platform is still arguably the market leader (and unquestionably a game changer), and is just beginning to mature. It's a very young, very vital ecosystem. You can't compare this hardware and software to what Palm was doing with Palm OS and the Centro -- not even in the same universe.
MARKET LEADER?!?!?!?!!!!! you don't have a great start with iphone, and then make few-to-no changes to its successors, and still deserve to be called market leader after two years of being in the market. seriously, they have not provided us with the features that make it a good smartphone. if they don't satisfy all types of customers, then market leader my ASS.
game changer yeah.. two years back. and they have done nothing to keep that name up now, they will fall with this 3gS... nothing innovative. same old iphone case with a few new shiny features.
Please explain how it cannot be compared. We need to learn from past mistakes before we repeat them. Yes, the iphone is still young. This is only the second year on the market. However, this is a 3rd generation device. 3rd Generation and there has essentially been no actual change. The Treo 600 was a pretty nice phone. I loved it. The Treo 650 was even nicer, it had the stuff that I wished was included on the 600. But when Palm released the 700p, and it was exactly the same, that was a sign of Palm needing a refresh. And then when the Treo 680 came out, and it was the same as the 700, sans antenna...
Are we going to wait until the 4th generation iphone comes out before we realize history is repeating?
Just a word of advice to the Engadget writers and Josh in particular: if you listen to these Microsoft fanatics and try to change your coverage of Apple to accommodate their negativity, your click count is going to suffer. As recent polling suggests (The iPhone 3G and iPhone 3GS garnered 57 percent of the vote), the majority of the readers prefer Apple products. I wouldn't pay attention to that vocal ten percent that don't.
im with you on that one, josh. tho skyblaze never owned an apple device (and this probly wont change his mind) you gotta give it to the peeps over at cupertino for making something so influential in the mobile handset world... and they're still pushin' thru... they dont need a slew of changes and extras to keep iphone alive... its still got that much of a lead in the game to stay alive -without- any help... atleast for now... palm, android and even ms are steppin their game up (not so sure about symbian... i got my n97 and as excited as i was [and satisfied i am with it] i still gotta say i can feel the datedness of s60 (remember... this is from a person who's never owned an s60 device before)
yea... idk.. just my two cents...
great review, josh :D
sooo, gmail told me
Hey there,
Paul a. Chapel has replied to one of your comments!
and i thought "ooh shit nooooo!!"
You are a certified apple fanboy dude.. and you hate people who are not part of your apple shit sellout. lol.
@skyblaze You're right, it doesn't need a lot of changes to keep the phone alive. But why settle for keeping it alive? At what point does it go from staying alive to being put on life support? It's a great OS with great developers adding to the functionality every day. But that functionality is being severly hampered by the hardware restrictions. The iphone doesn't have the advantage that every other company does of being able to repackage the same OS with different hardware and call it a new phone. They get one chance a year, just one chance, to make people decide if they want their product. If they don't release something new, their consumers will stagnate and they won't attract new business.
@Cash
You know what, I'm a critic of Engadget's Apple bias but there was no way that was anything other than a fair, balanced and bloody useful review. If it was a fapathon Joshua would have ended with an OMG BUY IT NOW!1! which he quite clearly didn't - instead he came out with the caveats that any potential buyer should be aware of.
Good show, chaps. Top marks for the review.
I have issues with the 3.2 mp camera and the lack of multitasking as well. It's a slight disappointment.
@niteninja et al ...That said, you critics are demanding too much. There is nothing wrong with continuously asking more of the companies you look to purchase from, but this is getting to be irrational. Apple runs a business. Remember that. They have a product that is selling indisputably incredibly well. Making minor modifications to that product is fine with them until they see that marketshare/sales decrease.
Thankfully, the vocal 10% of pissy critical readers have changed engadget's tone. This review IS balanced and fair. Unfortunately, that same vocal 10% of pain-in-the-ass readers seem to grasp at straws when there's nothing to whine about.
The iPhone is a MARKET leader because they have excellent MARKETing. It's not just about how great how the device is. It's also about how you present the product to the right people.
They also created a user experience that many people who never had a smartphone can easily access (and please don't start with the "iPhone is not a smartphone argument"). I'm a proud Palm Pre owner but acknowledge that Apple has created something remarkable.
Sometimes you have to look beyond the numbers and specs on paper. What the iPhone offers is not just a decent phone, but also a great experience. It may be not for some people, but obviously it is for many.
Get a bunch of random people in a room and see how many people recognize the word iPhone and how many recognize the N97 or the Xperia. It's all about good marketing.
1. Anyone who thinks this isn't a major update, is just plain delusional. Yes, the features don't match some existing phones, but comparing it to the previous generation of iPhone it's a pretty big deal.
2. Nike+ is huge for me. I love running, and when I travel, i carry my iPhone and a Nano, just for Nike+. Now, I can leave the Nano behind!
3. about that whole "market leader" argument... it is the market leader. See, the "market" is a financial term. iPhone blows away every other smartphone in worldwide sales. If a lump of poo with corn chunks sells more than a lump of poo with peanut chunks, the corn chunk poo is the market leader. Even if some people prefer peanuts.
4. It's young, people. It's on it's 3rd generation, and gets better every time. Humans didn't crawl out of the sludge and invent cars. There was some evolution in there. (if you agree with evolution, that is).
5. I've used the G1, I've used the Palm Pre. I've used 2 Nokias. I've used an LG Vue. I always go back to the iPhone.
6. Look, a Palm 700, now with NO ANTENNA BUMP!!!! See, that's a meh hardware update.
@ Josh
Market leader & game changer huh? Interesting that RIM has been eating up 20% of their smartphone market share. Apple is on a steady decline and comfortably under 20% now. Just goes to show that rehashing the same old hardware an entire year later, and slapping a new OS doesn't amount to a NEW phone that the public will want.
iPhone 3GS(ame)
@ Jimmy
Oh really??? The iPhone leads the market in (not only U.S.) but WORLDWIDE smartphone sales? HAHAHAHAHA what a joke.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/17/technology/rim_blackberry_preview/index.htm?postversion=2009061710
Nice try. Apple doesn't even account for 20% of the UNITED STATES' market share, let alone the world, where I assume they are somewhere around 2-3%.
Lol wow thanks for the laugh.
iPhone 3G S(hitty)
meh
Engadget, where's the N97 review??? I've been waiting so long for it...
Nice review on the 3GS though.
do expect lot irrational bashing like bgr
+1 Ive been waiting a while too...
I thought BoyGenius' review of the N97 was quite excellent, and I'm generally a fan of Nokia. It's just not a very interesting phone.
Also it will be nice if there will be FAIR comparison of latest smarphones
e.g. Nokia N97, HTC Diamond, iPhone 3GS and HTC Touch Pro2 (maybe others too like Blackberry)
this would clear the field for me... :D
Just be honest with yourself and realize the release of the 3GS is more significant in the world of gadgets than the N97 is. I'm not saying one is better than the other, I'm just saying recognize the reality of how it is. Besides, don't I always have to hear about how Nokia sells millions and millions more phones than Apple? So see that as a big victory and be happy. Nokia has nothing to worry about, right? How come you don't look totally sure?
The N97 feels like a bit of a disappointment. That said it'll sell equally as well - if not better - than the iPhone in Europe whilst selling bugger all in the US.
iPhone is useless brick in countries except US and UK, in russia they had millions of 3G phones left which are not selling well.. Also you HAVE to unlock for some countries and internet is not people's best friend in many countries. So nokia kicks apple's ass on all other countries so that is why bother about them, and they make phones which survive better then iPhone... (how many alive 1st gen iPhones can you find which have no cracked screen or any significant damages....) and you can find like people using Nokia phones from 1998 and they work perfectly fine with out any damages... so that is why people give shit about that, and don't try to say that 6 billion people care about features which iphone has...but iPhone did kick industry into their crotches... and make them run faster... and I think nokia and samsung and htc all have good replacements for iPhone
@ill trooper:
"How come you don't look totally sure?"
How were you able to tell that person wasn't sure??? Which part of his comment suggests so? Hee/she wasn't even remotely referring to Nokia "victory" or "domination" over Apple. Were you just being a douche, like most iTards?
You can bet your ass that engadget will bash the video recording on the N97 as "soooo 2006", but on the jesusPhone with same specs (and worse picture quality) they're praising it like it's the greatest innovation in the history of mankind.
I can already see it coming up in the N97 review: "What? no slow motion capture? Where's the HD recording? Is this seriously the best you can do, Nokia?" or something like that.
Actually, the N97 does fall short on a number of fronts - and, no, I'm not talking about resistive touchscreens (because the difference between a good resistive and good capacitive is so minute that you would hardly notice) or S60v5's eccentric interface (because if you buy a phone you're probably going to have it for at least a year so it's irrelevant if you can pick one up in 5 minutes and the other takes an hour) or multitouch (possibly the most pointless feature on a mobile phone - great on a Macbook trackpad but utterly, utterly futile on a phone), I'm talking about:
* Poor quantity of free RAM. It's supposed to be a powerhouse FFS.
* The keyboard. What in God's name were they thinking of?
* No - as far as I can tell - dedicated graphics acceleration.
Now BGR did come across as a complete tool as well as a sulky child, but that doesn't excuse these failings. If Nokia is claiming this is their flagship then they need to do better. Yes, it'll sell millions but it's not what it should have been.
The keyboard is fine. GSMarena called it the best keyboard they have tried in it's class.
Summation: Underwhelming.
so is t+he battery % indicator working on the 3G?? I saw on the video..