Olympus E-P1 hands-on, test shots, and mini-review

Gallery: Olympus E-P1 hands-on
Hardware

The hardware on the E-P1 is obviously gorgeous. At first glance, you can't help but be somewhat taken by the styling, which pays clear homage to Olympus cameras from the 60's and 70's -- in this case, the original "Pen" line of small, fixed lens and SLR models. The build quality doesn't disappoint either; the camera feels solid in your hands, though not so heavy or bulky that you couldn't throw it into a bag or shoot one-handed. In fact, we were pleasantly surprised with just how compact the device feels in your hands and when compared with an average DSLR.
The E-P1 has a large, 3-inch LCD display which was clear and crisp indoors, though we found it to be almost impossible to use in daylight. That wouldn't be an issue, except that the camera has no viewfinder, so under bright (or even overcast) light, you pretty much have to cross your fingers. This was kind of a big issue for us -- not being able to tell how an image will look in daylight is a bit of a downer when you're out shooting photos. Still, we found ways to compensate, but nothing that made up for a dedicated viewfinder.
Olympus does offer a $100 viewfinder attachment, though it's not going through the lens. It will help a bit in these situations, but doesn't really give you much wiggle room (or the accuracy you'd get with standard DSLR).

Thankfully, Olympus puts most of your go-to settings just a button press away, though the company does tuck away f-stop and shutter speed controls in menus accessible from the wheel on the back. We found getting into manual mode and flipping between settings to be relatively painless -- most of the functionality is obvious just by glancing at the back of the camera and controls up top.
Software
The E-P1 was a cinch to set up and start snapping pictures with. We found the menu layout and navigation to be quite easy to figure out after a few quick guesses (though we have the advantage of constantly looking through the menus of new gadgets). Olympus is clearly aiming this model at the casual photographer set, offering lots and lots of preset modes that let you quickly get to snapping. We didn't need to use many of them, though the variations that we tried produced excellent results.

Those presets are a nice touch from the company, and will make this camera much easier to position to moms and dads that want to take nice family shots without a lot of fuss, or the amateur photographers who are looking for something easier and quick than their DSLR. More serious shooters will still have all the options they're looking for, but it's obvious that this is targeted elsewhere.
Still image quality
Our early impressions of the image quality from the E-P1 are mostly positive, though we do have a few issues with the camera that sap a tiny bit of our excitement.


Using the stock 14-42mm lens provided plenty of range for shooting, and we found the speed and accuracy of the autofocus to be rock solid (it wasn't quite D90 quality, but excellent nonetheless). As we mentioned before, indoors shooting was a snap, but going out-of-doors took a little adjusting. Once we got comfortable with the "hope for the best" angle of using the LCD, we ended up with some pretty decent shots. One big issue we had, however, was with color saturation and tint. We found much of the red and pink in our photos to be exaggerated in an unflattering way, with some reds even coming off as over exposed and nearly hot pink in hue. This doesn't feel like a dealbreaker (it obviously can be compensated for), but coming out of the box with noticeable color issues wasn't a plus in our book.
Gallery: Olympus E-P1 test shots
For low light / high ISO shooting, we came away pretty impressed with the noise levels we saw. The E-P1 has an ISO range of 100-6400. At the top end (and with a sensor this small) we expected more noise than we actually got. Compared with similarly sized point-and-shoot cameras, we thought this model did a brilliant job at tackling ISOs that would be unusable on some of the competition.

ISO 1000 vs. ISO 6400
Overall, we're not about to pass final judgment on still quality -- we've only given the camera a short test, and we expect to see better (and more interesting) results once we've spent more time tweaking.
Video image quality
When it came to video, we were frankly blown away. The 720p output is nothing short of breathtaking, and we're looking forward to shooting some serious cop dramas with this thing. Unfortunately, we do have a bone to pick with Olympus on the audio -- the stereo sound is excellent, but while using continuous focus (a nice touch, and it looks great), the sound of the lens makes the experience somewhat less heartening. It's not unusable, but to have your gorgeous video marred by the shhhk / click of the lens is a bit annoying. That whole issue could easily be circumvented with an external audio input... but Olympus doesn't provide one here, meaning you're stuck with what's onboard.
Wrap-up

We still have plenty more to explore on the E-P1, such as the in-camera editing, slideshow options, and lots of little perks that Olympus has smartly added, but at a glance, we're impressed with much of what the company has delivered.
Obviously some of the detracting factors here should give pause before you put down your $799 for the basic kit, but you should know that there are also a lot of really outstanding features and impressive performance packed into this small and extremely attractive package. The E-P1 would be an excellent pick for anyone getting serious about photography who wants something easy to use, but still powerful enough to take really striking pictures and video. And for the gadget lovers out there... well, let's just say our wallets might be getting about $800 lighter pretty soon.
If you want to read more on the E-P1, take a look at Gadling's informative multi-part review right here.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
bombastinator @ Jul 1st 2009 2:29PM
making the ring thicker doesn't make the lens bigger. I suspect styling over substance here.
Marc-O @ Jul 1st 2009 5:35PM
You suspect wrong - have you seen how the lens telescopes out ? When you design a lens, you have to put the mechanics somewhere...
bombastinator @ Jul 1st 2009 5:40PM
seeing no pics of that anywhere.
Marc-O @ Jul 1st 2009 9:19PM
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/olympusep1/page2.asp
Look on that page...
BobSpaceTech @ Jul 1st 2009 2:28PM
Why is the video set to private?! I want to seeeee!
Joshua Topolsky @ Jul 1st 2009 2:32PM
Fixed! Video should be working now.
BobSpaceTech @ Jul 1st 2009 2:42PM
That is perrrrddddyyyyy!
I DEMAND AN ENGADGET RECESSION ANTIDOTE FOR THE E-P1!!!
LondonConsultant @ Jul 1st 2009 6:59PM
Well, I'd set my videos to private if the focusing was that noisy...
Craig @ Jul 4th 2009 12:31AM
Why not just focus manually? Does the audio pick up any noise then?
Anthony M. @ Jul 1st 2009 2:31PM
No Pancake lens shots? :(
Dummy00001 @ Jul 1st 2009 7:34PM
The shots I have seen from 17mm are very similar to the 25mm pancake - same CA in corners.
P.S. Here there are few shots with 17mm:
http://fourthirds-user.com/2009/06/olympus_pen_ep1_sample_images_to_download.php
ajs @ Jul 1st 2009 2:31PM
Shoot in RAW (and chose the correct color profile or other tweaks) and/or adjust the white balance and you can probably make those color issues go away.
all things considered @ Jul 1st 2009 2:33PM
i'd love to be blown away by the video recording too, but...
all things considered @ Jul 1st 2009 2:35PM
thanks for fixing that, josh. and while the video recording is no doubt impressive, i totally agree with your sentiments on the noise of the continuous focus; it gets so annoying after a while!
Information Central @ Jul 1st 2009 6:01PM
Not to mention the rolling-shutter distortion of the frame when the camera moves. Not as bad as some, but still an issue.
The double-pumping on every focus attempt is not ideal, either.
The compression quality, however, looks impressive (not that the twice-compressed example on YouTube proves anything).
Mike Bertolino @ Jul 1st 2009 3:16PM
I hope the loading time is better than what I have on the FE-230 I have. It looks like it's a pretty sexy camera though.
John Doe @ Jul 1st 2009 2:41PM
Does it come up as a worthy competitor to the DSLRs of these days?
Yem @ Jul 1st 2009 7:00PM
Depends on what's important to you. No dSLR comes close in terms of size so if that's a priority it really has no competition.
Andrew @ Jul 1st 2009 2:44PM
I really wish this had a coupled rangefinder, I'd be all over it.
:(
Dummy00001 @ Jul 1st 2009 7:34PM
> coupled rangefinder
17mm lens has rangefinder add-on.
Jangie @ Jul 1st 2009 10:42PM
@dummy00001 , actually, that accessory for the 17mm is just a viewfinder. a coupled rangefinder is something *completely* different.
Preston @ Jul 1st 2009 2:55PM
I'd be more inclined to take this camera a lot more seriously if its name didn't resemble the title for certain email spam I got all the time regarding "products" asking me if I wanted more inches.
Blackster @ Jul 1st 2009 2:58PM
those sounds are annoying. haven't heard any with my lumix fz3 so far, have to try it in a low noise environment next ^^
the still fotos of the ep1 do look nice!
James @ Jul 1st 2009 3:00PM
Give me a viewfinder or give me death!!!
David @ Jul 1st 2009 5:21PM
yeah they seem to have dropped it big time here. Like the look of the camera a lot but you need a proper viewfinder for it to be seriously considered as a proper camera these days.
Yem @ Jul 1st 2009 7:04PM
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2009/06/finding-the-view-and-zooming-it-too.html
CityZen @ Jul 2nd 2009 2:12AM
Just add a light-shield to the back with a convex lens focusing on the LCD. Instant EVF!
Of course, portability might suffer a bit, but then design it so it folds away like some opera glasses can.
Steve @ Jul 20th 2009 4:57AM
Dude it's 2009 we use lcd screens now. Viewfinders just don't cut it anymore.
bk7 @ Jul 1st 2009 3:03PM
the video on that is fantastic, the noise of the lense seems a tragic oversight :(
unzarjones @ Jul 1st 2009 5:00PM
The noise is jarring to say the least. That, plus the jerky focus, makes it look like some kind of special effect in a robo killer movie. Now if you want that in every video...
Information Central @ Jul 1st 2009 6:01PM
Focus manually, and the problem goes away.
Yoyoma @ Jul 1st 2009 3:06PM
out with the olympus e-300 and in with the EP-1. THIS is the camera I've been waiting for!
Jim F @ Jul 1st 2009 3:06PM
While your review mentions the availability of the external finder, it does not state that said finder is useless with the kit zoom -- it is a fixed finder with brightlines that match the field of view of the 17mm pancake. An important point, as it currently reads as if said finder would be a general accessory for the camera, rather than a specific accessory for the camera+17mm combo.
Dummy00001 @ Jul 1st 2009 7:40PM
> external finder ... 17mm pancake
Such viewfinders were always for prime lenses. E.g. Leica M8 rangefinder doesn't even have zoom lenses.
Jim F @ Jul 1st 2009 7:57PM
@Dummy00001 - Actually, there are two zooms available for the Leica M system -- a 16/18/21 and a 28/35/50 -- not traditional zooms, but the same concept applied to the rangefinder.
Voigtlander makes a zoom external finder that covers 15-35mm, designed for use with the film & digital rangefinders -- it even has focal length conversion settings for the crop sensors found in the Epson RD-1 and Leica M8/M8.2.
David @ Jul 1st 2009 3:07PM
ugh. no manual controls on the camera ... only though menus?
Eric @ Jul 1st 2009 3:26PM
It has two control dials for manual exposure.
max.karpiak @ Jul 1st 2009 3:08PM
What's the shutter release lag like? Is it fast like shooting a DSLR, or slow like shooting a compact?
why not the LS2LS7? @ Jul 1st 2009 9:37PM
If you set the settings correctly on your P&S, it'll actually have less shutter lag than a dSLR because it doesn't have to move the mirror box out of the way.
If you leave AF on, this thing will be a lot slower than a dSLR because it doesn't have phase-detect autofocus.
Neil @ Jul 1st 2009 3:10PM
No viewfinder? You'd have to be somewhat serious about photography to spend that much on a camera, no way would I spend that much on a camera without a viewfinder.
Eric @ Jul 1st 2009 3:30PM
Same for me. Luckily Olympus has already stated they are working on a version with more "pro features" such as an EVF. Their main target for this camera was people that are used to P&S cameras (none of which have VF's either. Sorry, plastic peep-holes like the Canon G10 don't count), but want SLR image quality without the bulk. I'd say they nailed that concept. Now I just want an E-P2 with EVF that looks like that fan mock-up thats been floating around the interwebs.
adam @ Jul 1st 2009 3:13PM
I *really* wanted to love this thing. This dedicated Canon big-DSLR guy has been excited about the MFT concept since it's introduction. But the E-P1 just feels like it has too many compromises to be worth the investment in body and new glass. No viewfinder, crappy LCD, no flash (handy when you need it, and kind of expected in a small-format device), no usable video -- as much as there is to lust after, this first-generation unit would end up sitting on the shelf. I just hope the limitations of the E-P1 don't doom MFT altogether; I'd love to see what the 3rd-gen Pannie and Olympus MFT bodies can do.
Eric @ Jul 1st 2009 3:33PM
Doesn't the $6,500 Canon EOS 1Ds Mk III have the same "crappy" 3" 230,000k LCD ;)
adam @ Jul 1st 2009 3:37PM
Perhaps, but it also has a TTL viewfinder!
Eric @ Jul 1st 2009 3:50PM
And it weighs 5lbs with a lens attached. Every system has its pros and cons. The trick is to pick out the one that best does what you need it to do. I to require a VF, but a great number of people couldn't care less. I always find it funny when I hand my DSLR to someone to use and they try and figure out how to compose a shot. Sadly, most people don't even think about putting their eye up to the camera these days.
jake @ Jul 1st 2009 3:32PM
"Olympus does offer a $100 viewfinder attachment, though it's not going through the lens. It will help a bit in these situations, but doesn't really give you much wiggle room (or the accuracy you'd get with standard DSLR)."
The external viewfinder is only for use with the 17mm fixed focal length lens, not the 14-42mm zoom lens pictured here. The viewfinder is a passive optic and only provides framing assistance with the 17mm lens. It has nothing to do with focusing. The viewfinder is an item found on rangefinder cameras, and thus has little to do with the way an SLR (or a DSLR) functions. The viewfinder, along with manual settings, allows the photographer to operate the camera without the distractions of automation thereby shoot faster than those automatic function would allow. Some photographers would see this as a benefit or added flexibility in the design.
phiberoptik @ Jul 1st 2009 3:32PM
so retro
Florian @ Jul 1st 2009 3:41PM
"just how compact the device feels in your hands and when compared with an average DSLR"
Stop comparing it to a DSLR! It is a Point 'n' Shoot with a bigger sensor, nothing more and nothing less. There is more on a DSLR than a big sensor.
backslash @ Jul 1st 2009 4:15PM
Micro Four Thirds cameras are still very much DSLRs. There are no inherent compromises with the new format - Olympus opted not to have a viewfinder or base flash because they felt that if you needed them, you'd buy an attachment.
I'll agree that the lack of viewfinder might seem like a compelling argument not to call this a professional or semi-professional camera, but the fact is that viewfinders are just a common preference among photographers. Who's to say that in a year or two professional photographers won't want to see any effects or changes that they make in real time on their LCD screen rather than their archaic viewfinder?
bdenglish @ Jul 1st 2009 5:53PM
Exactly. It's not an SLR there is no mirror or pentaprism, thats partly how they are able to shrink the body size.