Ultrasone Edition 8 headphones hands-on and impressions

Make no mistake, these cans are for audiophiles (affluent ones, at that) only. We mean, $1,500 headphones are hard to justify regardless of your salary, but those obsessed with hearing only the best have proved time and time again that they'll pay absurd quantities of cash in order to do so. At any rate, we have to admit that the fit and finish here really shines. Every square millimeter of these just scream precision and luxury, and the materials chosen for construction are just delightful to the touch. The headband and earcups are soft and supple, and the extensions on both sides were easy to adjust. We'll confess -- we weren't huge fans of the chrome cup exterior, as our fingerprints managed to mar the shine within a few seconds of looking things over. The cabling that extends down is nothing too fancy, and while we're sure it'll hold up just fine, we honestly expected something a bit more extravagant given the price.

Frankly, the earcups are on the small side. We got the feeling that Ultrasone built these to barely fit around one's ear in order to provide maximum isolation from outside noise, but in practice, it's a design that will very likely irritate wearers after an extended period of time. While testing, our head and ears were perfectly comfortable for around 1.5 hours (and noise from the outside was essentially nonexistent), but into the second straight hour of listening, we were finally forced to remove them due to noticeable discomfort. We made sure to tweak the headband and all, but we never could wear these for over three hours without having to give our ears a break. Granted, most listeners won't sit for three solid hours and listen to their headphones, but if any niche would, it'd be the hardcore audiophiles (read: the very segment these are targeting).

So, we know you're curious about the sound quality, and we have to say -- it's downright dazzling. We listened to these on everything from a janky $20 MP3 player to an iPhone to a Denon SACD deck, and one thing became glaringly apparent: if you're listening to lossy tracks through these, you'll know it. These are amongst the few cans we've ever tried where the detail was so great that you could literally tell a difference between sources. We heard background vocals and subtle instrumentation changes for the first time in jams that we'd been listening to for years, and we were simply astonished that actual head pain set in long before ear fatigue. The Edition 8s did a marvelous job of projecting the highs and mids in a way that really cut through, yet we never grew tired of hearing cymbal crashes and squealing vocals. "Clarity" was the one word that kept popping to mind when switching from track to track; it was almost as if the fog we'd been listening through on stock earbuds had finally been removed.

Though, for as well as the cans handled the highs and mids, we have to admit that we expected more from the bottom end. From the factory, the bass lines are nearly non-existent. We had to bust out the equalizer and boost the bottom frequencies to bring the bass more in line with the mids and highs, and in most instances, that sufficed. When given a little incentive, the Edition 8s handled kick drums and bass runs like a champ, but they didn't seem to get along so well with pulsing beats and electronic booms found frequently in the techno genre. In fact, we heard audible distortion in the bass frequencies alone on a number of occasions with the volume at around 40 percent, and while killing the EQ fixed the issue, it also removed the drive that's so crucial in these types of tracks.

All in all, we were absolutely impressed with the overall clarity and build quality of Ultrasone's new flagship headphones, but the quirks present weren't minor enough for us to totally forgive. If you're the type who listens exclusively to Johnny Cash, Nickel Creek and Dolly Parton, you've found your perfect cans. If your playlists contains artists such as LCD Soundsystem, M83 and Brothers, you should probably look for a set that's built to handle the low-lows a tad better. If you're somewhere in between, we'd say that you'll be thoroughly pleased with the output of the Edition 8s, but unless you've got boatloads of cash and a dearth of ways to spend it, we don't feel that these perform $1,300 better than, say, the also marvelous Audio-Technica ATH-A900s.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Az1Z @ Jul 17th 2009 12:51PM
i still love my audio technikas
Ian @ Jul 17th 2009 1:33PM
I had a very low end pair of on ear audio technika's. I must say for $15, I was very impressed with them. I was disappointed when I put them in my backpack and the plastic broke. If they made them that folded flat, I'd buy them in a heartbeat.
Information Central @ Jul 17th 2009 5:22PM
Too bad there's no popular music mastered in the last decade that even warrants $200 headphones. Thanks to dynamic compression, music is ruined before it ever reaches us. To make matters worse, record companies are going back and destroying their entire back catalogs with "remastering".
Ripping consumers off is bad enough, but now these jerkoffs are destroying artists' work and our entire musical heritage. FOR NO REASON.
king luke III @ Jul 18th 2009 4:34AM
Infocentral, that was stupid. Not everyone listens to 128kbs mp3s....
Nikesh @ Jul 18th 2009 11:20AM
@King Luke III: Maybe before you spout off one of the stupidest things I've heard in a while and make yourself look like a complete ass, you'd take a minute to think of why someone would make such a post. Perhaps he's talking about the dynamic range compression that happens in recording studios or that audio engineers perform before a cd is pressed. Maybe Infocentral's knowledge of the audio world goes past your novice understanding of MP3s to where music is actually made and how it is distributed. Next time, think before you type.
On a side note, why is it that all these manufacturers these days think that shiny metal or chrome is the end all be all to design. I think these would look so much better, and be more functional, if they were in a brushed aluminum.
James @ Jul 17th 2009 12:53PM
Wow, a Hard Rock glass from Guam. Who was visiting there? I used to live there for a few years back around 2000.
10minutehobo @ Jul 17th 2009 3:46PM
Wow, you're cool now.
To: Hell @ Jul 17th 2009 4:04PM
@10minutehobo Every comment of yours is asshole-like.
You do understand that your life is not our fault, right?
Brian @ Jul 20th 2009 12:32AM
Same Here! In fact the ONLY reason I clicked on the link is because of the Hard Rock Guam glass. I lived there as a kid and I'm dying to go back and visit some day. Hello fello guamanians...native or not!!
Darren @ Jul 17th 2009 5:33PM
Had a cousin there in the Air Force. I collect HRC glasses so I couldn't resist getting him to snag one for me. I definitely want to go myself sometime!
10minutehobo @ Jul 18th 2009 8:24AM
To: Hell: Really? You've read all of my comments? Are you stalking me? :-/
I just find it silly people get excited over souvenirs.
mayur @ Jul 17th 2009 12:54PM
i love my bose headsets... would get a new bose home theatre at this cost instead
Trey @ Jul 17th 2009 1:01PM
Its people like you I feel sorry for, all caught up in the marketing hype of Bose to realize you can get something so much better for the same price. Bose isnt bad, they're just terribly over rated, home theatres included.
Will @ Jul 17th 2009 2:09PM
You can get better headphones for the same price that you are paying for Bose products.
Lgn @ Jul 17th 2009 2:46PM
The two guys above me are right, Bose headphones aren't all that great. I mean, $50 Porta-Pros and PX100 are arguably better than the $200 Bose around ear.
Richard @ Jul 17th 2009 3:47PM
perhaps he was making a joke?
Gradoman @ Jul 17th 2009 12:58PM
Hey totally off-topic, but, I own the Ultrasone HFI-580s!
I really like them more than my Grado SR125s in terms of comfort and the sound quality is just about the same -- except the lows have more oomph (but that's probably because the Grados are open air).
(On-topic below)
No need to spend a couple thousand when the lower end models would get the job done for $200 or less...
...well if these pretty things were put up as a Recession Antidote and you won 'em...
Nathan Otis @ Jul 17th 2009 3:28PM
If I won these, I would frame them... I'm not entirely certain I could hear the difference between these and a $150-$200 set of phones...
goss @ Jul 17th 2009 12:59PM
Darren, is "wicked" going to become some engadget staple with your posts?
NoAndThen @ Jul 17th 2009 3:01PM
Engadget is located in New York- welcome to the Northeast dude. I'm willing to wager Darren has spent a fair amount of time in MA/New England.
Wicked pissah!
Don't let them get you down Darren.
New England FTW!
Ypoknons @ Jul 17th 2009 1:01PM
Well, welcome to the world of Head-fi, Engadget. =) We'll see how long it takes for you to break down and get a HD800 and some crazy amp.
rock99rock @ Jul 17th 2009 1:02PM
I just got these:
http://www.trittontechnologies.com/products/TRIGA611.htm
They were a little over $100, but sound amazing! With individual channel control, (plus the fact that you can integrate with XBOX Live), the 8 speakers 1" from my head with considerable clarity allows me to laugh in the general direction of headphones that cost 15x as much.
Have a great day everyone!
roosta.6 @ Jul 17th 2009 1:46PM
what headphones have you heard "that cost 15x as much"? actually, what other headphones have you heard at all?
Chad @ Jul 17th 2009 1:53PM
8 crappy little speakers are not equal to 2 quality drivers... "But I want surround" - then check out Dolby Headphone or other similar processing effects (Yamaha Silent Cinema).
RedSky @ Jul 18th 2009 5:03AM
There's a very good reason that you won't see any reputable headphone manufactures such as Beyer, Sennheiser and AKG integrating 8 drivers into their headphones. Because inevitably each of those separate drivers have to be cheaper than what could otherwise be afforded by a single driver/earphone setup, they end up sounding like tosh while offering no actual surround sound benefits over a standard full-sized headphone.
In other words, enjoy your toy.
Richard @ Jul 17th 2009 3:51PM
I'm all for surround sound headsets... I just bought and reviewed a pair of Razer Megalodons and I am about to buy a set of Astro A40's to compare.
BUT, you are comparing apples with oranges my good man. Surround sound is great for games and immersion while you play, but they won't compare to a set of high end stereo headphones for music.
rock99rock @ Jul 17th 2009 4:40PM
Good lawd did I strike a nerve?
@roosta.6: I have heard the Ultrasone Edition 9 set a few years back, Sennheiser HD800's and the like more recently. "actually, what other headphones have you heard at all?" Thats kinda dick? How about, "How many pots have you smokin?" - That's how your question sounded to me. Unfounded. Feel lucky I graced you with a response.
@Chad: "8 crappy little speakers are not equal to 2 quality drivers..." I'm starting to get the feeling that no one here has even tried the Trittons?
@RedSky: "In other words, enjoy your toy." Thank you! I have and will continue to do so.
For you guys up top, this was completely my opinion which I am more than entitled to. If you want to spend $1500 on some headphones, you go right ahead! My financials (girlfriend) prevents me from doing so. If I did, i highly doubt I would spend that much regardless, as the difference in sound is far less than the difference in price from what I currently use. Nothing is stopping you from testing out the Trittons though :) For my needs, they are more than I could have hoped for. Good luck!
@Richard: "BUT, you are comparing apples with oranges my good man. Surround sound is great for games and immersion while you play, but they won't compare to a set of high end stereo headphones for music" I think you might have nailed it- to some extent. It all comes to a matter of opinion, and what your own ears are capable of hearing. The Astro's are a nice step up from what I have :). However, the multi-channel audio that I frequently listen to, along with the games and movies make this the right set for me.
-Rock
4GetThis @ Jul 17th 2009 1:07PM
Imo, a home theater system would be a much better choice for this much money. I'm perfectly fine with my Bose QuietComfort 2s.
Ishcabible @ Jul 17th 2009 1:24PM
But not everyone has the space or a room with perfect acoustics.
4GetIt @ Jul 17th 2009 1:33PM
I guess that's true, but if someone is willing to spend 1,500 on headphones, I'm sure that more often than not these people will have a room with enough space for a home theater system.
Lgn @ Jul 17th 2009 2:48PM
That's not true, a lot of people invest a lot of money into audio equipment and live in small apartments.
MONKEY @ Jul 17th 2009 3:07PM
Well look at it this way - with the money you spent on your QC2's, you could have bought a far better set of cans.
Bluecold @ Jul 17th 2009 3:08PM
Yeah, but you are happy with Bose, so you don't no shit about decent audio reproduction.
Bluecold @ Jul 17th 2009 3:09PM
*know
4GetIt @ Jul 17th 2009 1:23PM
Imo, a home theater system would be a much better way to spend those $1,500 dollars. I'm perfectly fine with my Bose QC 2 headphones though they're overpriced as well.
deathcapt @ Jul 17th 2009 4:16PM
No, Head phones offer way more sound quality for the dollar than traditional speakers. In order to achieve the same sound quality out of a home theater system you're spend upwards of $10k you also need more expensive Amps, Receivers and you need a place to put all that shit, and you can't take it on the bus with you, or use it to listen to music at work.
Information Central @ Jul 17th 2009 5:26PM
Not to mention some material to play on it, and that means recordings (and, most importantly, pressings) from the mid-'90s or earlier. Everything since has been ruined to make it sound "louder" with dynamic compression, rendering a good (or even decent) stereo pointless.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war
roosta.6 @ Jul 17th 2009 1:50PM
just a thought, it was more likely to be your amplifier causing the distortion when you cranked up the EQ rather than the drivers. plus you do not mention any kind of burn-in period given to the headphones. since bass requires the most movement of the drivers it would probably have loosened up after a decent burn in period.
to any fan-boys of bose, what other headphones of a similar price bracket have you heard to compare them to? so many bose owners say "bose are better than xxxx" but they have never heard anything else. they go into a shop, listen to a bose headphone thats being marketed, and buy it, without any comparason to any other product. they are just sucked in by the marketing department at bose.
Lgn @ Jul 17th 2009 2:49PM
x2
NoAndThen @ Jul 17th 2009 3:08PM
I agree with you as well Roosta, I've yet to see an audio gear review from Engadget that takes things like that into account (or at least mentions it).
I've been rocking the HD595s by Sennheiser for a while (admittedly not in the same price range, I'm poor) and I absolutely love them, totally destroy any Bose 'phones I've heard (all of 'em.) I use a Total Bithead (http://www.headphone.com/products/headphone-amps/the-mobile-line/headroom-total-bithead.php) to drive them, and it's an excellent little amp, especially for the price.
Dear engadget: please check out www.headphone.com to see some good reviews of headphones that go in depth. You'll learn a LOT.
TehNomad @ Jul 17th 2009 3:13PM
High-end headphones can take as much as 100-200 hours to fully burn in according to people on Head-Fi.
Mico @ Jul 17th 2009 1:53PM
tried Edition9...great can...
this one looks a bit ugly to be honest~
hh83917 @ Jul 17th 2009 1:56PM
Damn for 1.5k I'd rather buy the HD800. The HD800 simply looks more like a 1.3k headphone considering the build quality and design...
Ishcabible @ Jul 17th 2009 3:29PM
*cough cough* spray painted plastic *cough cough*
Just kidding, I wish I heard it when I had the chance to.
Will @ Jul 17th 2009 2:02PM
One could purchase a nice stereo system for $1300 and buy a $200 pair of Grados for headphones. I'm convinced that being an audiophile has nothing to do with the actual sound. It is more of a status symbol.
Chan @ Jul 17th 2009 2:11PM
That may be the case for some, but not all audiophiles. If you like Grados then it must mean you appreciate sound quailty. To some folks a $1000 headphone is no different than a $200 headphone to others, it's matter of how much you can and are willing to spend.
Jake @ Jul 17th 2009 2:28PM
For me my mid-level, sub-$200 Shure IEMs and my Grado SR60's get the job done and give me some great unamped sound quality to boot. That said, these were my first entry into Head-fi, and I'm sure that I'll keep buying cans and IEMs that are "just $50 more than the last ones" until I'm at the point that I've spent $500 on each. ;D
NoAndThen @ Jul 17th 2009 3:09PM
Yeah, true audiophiles are worried about status symbols when the hide themselves away to a room by themselves for listening. Totally.
People who want more RAM and faster processors are really just gloating too. It doesn't actually make anything work better.
Vidikron @ Jul 17th 2009 3:53PM
@NoAndThen
Whatever. The A/V world is full of snake oil, that's just common knowledge. And you'll almost never see any self professed audiophile agree to any sort of blind testing, this is also common knowledge. OTOH, I'd be will to bet that just about any computer nerd would gladly test out two computers and guess which is faster.
Information Central @ Jul 17th 2009 5:30PM
True audiophiles gave up on popular music 10 years ago, when it became clear that every recording was destined to be destroyed with dynamic compression.
There is no reason to buy a good (or even decent) system to listen to anything mastered after the mid-'90s. It's a depressing fact that even recording engineers will attest to.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war