sucks. tried a few with the cross-eyed format. yes it's "3-d", but the difference from the closest object to the furthest object seems to be around 1cm or less. Not exactly 3d if you ask me.
You need to try other videos, or beter yet, High res 3d images. Blurry videos don't cut it, and seriously take away from the effect. But once you start watching good quality vids in 3D, you might not wanna go back, even if you use the cross eyed method. I've been checking this out alot recently.
Oh, try this image, it shows quite well how awesome 3D can be. Also check out the rest in that flicker group, they have some of the best 3D images I've seen.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
sucks. tried a few with the cross-eyed format. yes it's "3-d", but the difference from the closest object to the furthest object seems to be around 1cm or less. Not exactly 3d if you ask me.
You need to try other videos, or beter yet, High res 3d images. Blurry videos don't cut it, and seriously take away from the effect. But once you start watching good quality vids in 3D, you might not wanna go back, even if you use the cross eyed method. I've been checking this out alot recently.
Oh, try this image, it shows quite well how awesome 3D can be. Also check out the rest in that flicker group, they have some of the best 3D images I've seen.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/turbguy/3727995585/sizes/l/in/pool-62553512@N00/