There is no way on this earth these receivers can output those kinda power specs. Just look at the Emotiva UPA 7 amp. http://www.emotiva.com/upa7.shtm To produce 125 Watts per channel @ 8ohms (20hz - 20khz), the UPA 7 weighs 71 pounds, requires massive power rails and other amplifier thingy's that I don't know what they are called. But you get the point. The 807 power supply has to power the rest of the electronics (video and audio processors) plus the amp's output stage. All from one power supply. And it probably only weighs in at 26lbs.
"I'm moving to a small studio and for some reason the cable connection is in an awkward place and I need a way to transmit HD quality video and audio no more than 20 feet away. What is the best wireless HDMI transmitter / receiver for this situation? Thanks!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
There is no way on this earth these receivers can output those kinda power specs.
Just look at the Emotiva UPA 7 amp. http://www.emotiva.com/upa7.shtm
To produce 125 Watts per channel @ 8ohms (20hz - 20khz), the UPA 7 weighs 71 pounds, requires massive power rails and other amplifier thingy's that I don't know what they are called. But you get the point.
The 807 power supply has to power the rest of the electronics (video and audio processors) plus the amp's output stage. All from one power supply. And it probably only weighs in at 26lbs.
Well, from reviews ive read, the 805 was tested with 5 channels (not 7 like the UPA7), and the unit weighs 51 lbs.
The 807, on the other hand, weighs 38 lbs. I haven't seen any testing on it since it is still new.