"Of course, we don't have any idea how these elementary particles might actually conduct the business of destroying equipment, but that hasn't stopped the duo from proposing a novel way to test this theory."
It's because these particles, along with nature itself apparently, obviously are capable of logic, reasoning, and cognitive thinking. Duh.
Seriously, though, has the New York Times really come to this?
For those looking for a device strictly for reading, the new Kobo is a nice little option. It's small enough to slip into a pocket, can do more with a PDF than the competition, and at $129, it's $10 cheaper than both the Nook and Kindle WiFi.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
"Of course, we don't have any idea how these elementary particles might actually conduct the business of destroying equipment, but that hasn't stopped the duo from proposing a novel way to test this theory."
It's because these particles, along with nature itself apparently, obviously are capable of logic, reasoning, and cognitive thinking. Duh.
Seriously, though, has the New York Times really come to this?
i know thats what i dont understand. are Nielsen and Ninomiya suggesting the Higgs Boson is a god?
really tho, is the second half of the article a mockery or just a lack of detail, both of which confusing people.
The NYT fell off the ledge of reason long ago
@Brak: Well, it is the "god particle," so...