Entelligence: Seven on 7
Entelligence is a column by technology strategist and author Michael Gartenberg, a man whose desire for a delicious cup of coffee and a quality New York bagel is dwarfed only by his passion for tech. In these articles, he'll explore where our industry is and where it's going -- on both micro and macro levels -- with the unique wit and insight only he can provide.

Ready? Let's get the irrelevant stuff out of the way first.
Aero whatever: Whether it's Aero Glass, Aero Peek, Aero Shake or Aero whatever, it's gotten a lot of hype, but it's really just so much eye candy. After trying Aero Peek and Aero Shake I find I've never used them in any productivity setting. Sure, some people love gratuitous UI fluff but stuff like this is hardly worth shelling out money for.
Touch: First, you need a touch-enabled PC, which you probably don't have. Even then, the native touch features just aren't worth an upgrade on their own. TouchPack (which is cleverly branded as Surface apps) is nothing more than a tech demo. Give me a PC OS optimized for touch across the board and I'm all there, but this is just a gimmick.
Device Stage: Microsoft says this is "a new way to interact with your phone, camera, printer, or portable media player from the Windows desktop. Device Stage is new visual interface that makes it easy to find the things you want to do with your devices on your Windows 7 PC." I say, well, it doesn't do all that much. Perhaps in the future more devices will recognize the feature and help users do more advanced things, but for now Device Stage is more promise than delivery.
It might sound like I'm being negative but there's also four things in Windows 7 that I really like, and if you can make use of these features, they're certainly worth the price of the upgrade.
Performance and stability: Sure it seems like silly thing -- in fact high performance and relative stabilty should be table stakes for a modern OS. But the fact is that 7 is the best version of Windows Microsoft's ever produced. While Vista
Media Center is now best of breed for DVR and home theater applications. |
Windows Media Center: Windows Media Center has gone from being a pokey mess in Vista to something sleek, fast and powerful in Windows 7. With consumer-grade, user-installable cable card tuners available at last, MCE is now best of breed for DVR and home theater applications.
Home Group and remote access: Another winner. Home networking is a mess but Microsoft has made some nice efforts to tame the beast with Home Group. Setting up and configuring a home network has never been easier in Windows, and sharing media and content across the network to other Home Group PCs is just as simple. Even better, accessing your content like recorded TV shows from afar has never been easier on a PC. It's a must for anyone with a home network, multiple PCs who wants to do remote access simply and easily.
Eyefinity: Okay, this isn't a Windows 7 feature at all. It's an AMD feature that allows its latest line of consumer grade Radeon video cards to drive six monitors simultaneously.as one giant desktop of up to 268 megapixels. It offers a gaming and graphics experience that needs to be seen to be appreciated. And it works best on Windows 7.
Windows 7 is important and it's a big deal. Yes, under many circumstances it can be a hassle to get to, especially with no direct upgrades from Windows XP and many versions of Vista, but it's worth it. We've already seen the latest from Apple, and with the holiday season buying season officially on, it's going to be an interesting race with two strong and yet very different contenders.
Michael Gartenberg is vice president of strategy and analysis at Interpret, LLC. His weblog can be found at gartenblog.net, and he can be emailed at gartenberg AT gmail DOT com. Views expressed here are his own.






















git commit -m "yes he is"
It's not called MCE! And it hasn't been for two iterations of the software.
While being a small feature, Aero Snap is one of the most brilliant little things in UI design since Alan Kay invented overlapping windows in the 70s.
And Windows Media Center hasn't chanced so much from Vista to 7, it is almost the same. It was absolutely not a mess in Vista.
On the other features: I always miss that people mention the very good handwriting recognition, speech control, Ribbon interface for standard apps and resolution indepentent GUI. There is a lot of innovation in 7 (and Vista) that no other OS can offer these days.
I'm moving to the Mac. I've had it with Microsoft. They always go with flashy, non useful features. From a useability standpoint, Windows hasn't improved that much since Windows 98 except become more bloated. Is the Window-Tab feature still there?
Yes. Win+Tab is still there like it was since Windows 3. And it's so usefull that Apple copied it.
If you really look at the Apple OS you may realize that it still is the old Lisa concept (Menu bar on top...) miced with the Dock from NextStep and some animated new features on top like Exposé that don't really fit into the old app centric concept from the 80s.
So did anyone notice the Eyefinity feature being an "AMD RADEON" feature?
troll harder, michael. you may think aero is silly and trivial, neither of which are false, but the fact of the matter is people care about that sort of stuff, and the screen-snap is pretty cool. As for the device center, this is HUGE. no drivers needed to sync anything between a MP3 player in disk mode [many can do this and its a cross platform solution in lieu of a proprietary interface] and a WM smartphone.
Touch support is meh?
Well, maybe if you save your pennies like I did and buy a latitude XT (capacitive screen, multitouch and stylus support). With vista, touch was 2 fingers only and scrolling was bad. With 7... it's amazing how much more productive I can be when in tablet mode with 6 finger multitouch.
The copy, paste, cut, delete, back and forward gestures alone have completely changed the way I work when I'm up and about in the office. Win 7 is an absolute must for the touch/tablet crowd.
Basically, it's the first OS to make multitouch devices actually worth owning.
why does he dismiss the aero features? as a student and an aspiring programmer, writing a paper or using visual c++ while looking at some code can be annoying just switching from window to window. with aero you can have 2 good sized panes that you can look at constantly. it think he has a misguided view because aero is very useful
/start rant...
I would like to throw in a few more pennies if I could. Particularly to the, albeit few this time, apple fanboys who are barking about upgrading and tweaking to their "already perfect" os... I have a 6 year old Mac PowerPC G4. I also just purchased a copy of OS X Leopard to put on said mac, which btw has 1 gb of ram and a 1gz processor. Simply put, I went to format my OSX Tiger installation and install the "glorious" new OS on my antiquated mac only be told that "This Operating System is NOT compatible with your mac" and now have a mac without an OS, sitting in the corner of my office.
Now... I ALSO have a old Windows XP machine which I built the SAME DAY I bought the Mac, 6 years ago. It too has a 1ghz processor (Single core I might add, because dual core was the wave of the future) and 1 gb of ram. I go to install Windows 7 Home Premium on it after backing up my files and what did I find? Imagine that! It installed just fine, in all of 20-25 minutes, and I was off and running the new Windows OS without having to "upgrade" my Mac (i.e. make it a boat anchor and buy a new one).
Now tell me WHY Mac is SOOOOO much better than PC. I can install XP on the mac, and then I will have a truly WORTHY OS on such a good machine. Or I could also just make it my Linux box for when I want to monkey around and learn some more about my buddy Tux.
//end rant
You seem to be angry at Apple due to your own inability to research a product before you purchase it. Everyone should know by now that PowerPC models will not run Intel based programs.
Also (and this isn't directed specifically at you Richard, since you didn't actually state that one OS was superior to the other), Mac's aren't "better" than PC and visa-versa. Just as Pepperoni Pizza isn't better than Sausage Pizza... it's a matter of personal taste. I use Mac's because I like the combination of a smooth working OS and a well designed machine; sure, sometimes I wish I had XP installed so that I could run a particular app, but if I was using a PC I would definitely miss certain features and apps on the Mac.
Windows 7 is nice. I am proud to say that I was a beta tester. Although aero does tend to get in your way.
My daughter, Kylie has something to say about those Windows ads. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62BW2FJ6RIc
Maybe you should spend less time exploiting your child to win arguments on the internet, and more time doing something useful with your life.
I like windows, but I haven't seen any reason to upgrade my desktop or laptop with windows 7. I hate to seem cheap but my computer works fine and I don't want to spend the time or money to fix what isn't broke.
"...with the unique wit..." Oh, I get it. The unique in the way that it is not witty at all.
So a third-party gaming feature that isn't Win7-exclusive, and which maybe 5% or fewer of users will spend the $750-$1k+ on the hardware necessary to implement it, is a bigger deal than standardizing device management?
"It might sound like I'm being negative"
Yes you are. You are a FML. Why even bother commening on windows at all?
Windows Seven... of Nine.
"With consumer-grade, user-installable cable card tuners available at last, MCE is now best of breed for DVR and home theater applications."
Where are these cable card tuners? Vaporware for now.
Microsoft's does not mean "Microsoft has: - idiot.
waiting on universal spell check
very unimpressed with what its got
As many other have said, aero snap is a godsend when you have a widescreen monitor, I use it constantly and miss it a lot whenever I'm back on XP. I also love dragging the title bar of a window to the top of the screen to maximize it and then pulling it back down again to restore it - much faster and easier than mousing to the position of the maximize button.
Aero peek is also fantastic - it's very easy to figure out which window of the application you want from it and it also lets me keep the taskbar out of the way on the right side of the screen. With the old text label system putting the taskbar there required it to be wide enough for you to read the titles or guess.
I didn't even know about aero shake until recently, since I just start using the OS when I get it without reading guides, it's not something i've discovered accidentally so far - will have to try it when I get home (on XP atm), but it does sound limited in it's usefulness - to me. I'm sure that people who like to work on one app at a time and see the desktop behind it rather than a confusing clutter of other apps might enjoy it though.
Aero snap is actually a nice app. One of the best I've used in a long whhile. I don't see any reason for guys to think it sucks.
Thanks for sharing.
Ugo.jar
http://www.javamobilecrunch.com
I'm looking forward to windows 7, but during that unveling when they used the touch screen, you'd think they would have invested in a better quality touchscreen that dosen't require you to press down with a small bit of force to get the actual screen to respond, did you see how many times he pressed the buttons but got no response?
Not that it's changed my opinion, I'm looking forward to getting windows 7, but you know
I upgraded from XP to Ubuntu for free, actually dual boot.
I think Windows 7 shows great promise. I use it on my 2 computers - a 3-year-old HP laptop and a more recent HTPC. I was pleasantly surprised when the first public beta installed on the laptop without a glitch, with all my hardware recognized - it even fixed a problem where the integrated bluetooth wouldn't work on XP (which was the laptop's original OS) or Vista. I recently installed it on the HTPC, which I was more reluctant to do for fear of app incompatibility (especially Blu-Ray / HD-DVD playback software). Once again - no glitches!
I think I'll use the RC until it expires in March and then buy the full thing, unless I can see any advantage in getting it sooner.
If you are a student get on the student deal.
So Aero is a gimmicky and unnecessary reason to purchase an upgrade, but the fact that the ability to drive six monitors simultaneously "works best" on 7 is a *good* reason?
homegroup kinda sucks, all I want to do is share a single printer connected to a win 7 pc (previously using XP) to a computer using 7 and one using xp and I simply can't get it to work-furthermore it ruined file sharing between the computers. I see theb potential home homegroup but I just can't get it to work, why can't home networking be simple?
Don't use homegroup. I network the regular way.
Lets be honest here. I use both Snow Leopard and Windows 7. Windows 7 actually looks better than the very sparse looking Snow Leopard thanks to Aero. Sure it may not be the greatest UI we could imagine but it does look more pleasant than Mac OSX. Also it pretty much is as easy to use as Snow Leopard in pretty much every way. UAC is much preferable to typing in your password every time an application needs administrator access. Sharing is just as easy as Snow Leopard. Windows 7 may not have the slick backup interface of Time Machine but it materially can provide the same functionality.
This OS really holds the user's hand by checking compatibility, reporting errors, trying to find your drivers, troubleshooting problems etc. Given the VAST amounts of software and hardware it is compatible with there is no way it could be as seamless as a closed system like Apple's but it really is amazing given that VAST compatibility and interoperability.
It looks like MS got their wake up call.
bite me engadget
WTF is the point of the 6 monitor Eyefinity thing? Why not just hook your computer up to a nice big screen TV?
Gonna have to agree with most posts ive read here the aero features are totally usefull! I find aero snap is a little less usefull however when you have multiple monitors going as you can only snap to extreme edges of your monitor setup and not the edges of each monitor
I've been using Win7 for 2 days now. (that's 20 hours or so)
Well for one new Aero features are awesome, especially when you work with 10+ windows opened.
I also use Ubuntu 9.10 and SL.
I wouldn't say that this Aero is really better on itself, or that i can do things I couldn't with SL or Compiz BUT there is ONE thing FOR SURE : Aero is much much MUCH better fitted into the OS than Compiz or exposé.
I think Win7 is a huge step in terms of GUI.
And there are 2^(7)=128 comments before me!
i just got a bluescreen in 7. i'm using an m-audio fast track pro, using the latest 6.0.1 beta driver, and my pc blue-screened when it tried to go into sleep-mode. windows 7 seems just as stable as an african government.
Engadget, just like this article, is an epic fail when talking about Microsoft's stuffs.
Can't Engadget find some decent writers - or editors? There's nothing particularly insightful in the article.
Where's the logic in bashing touchscreen capability on the basis that not many people have touchscreen capable PCs but praising Eyefinity for being able to drive six monitors? How many of us have six monitors? Many graphics cards can drive two, and I'd bet that very few people use even two monitors.
At least the "writer" - apologies to real writers - has the grace to admit it's not a Win 7 feature. Er, in which case, why mention it? Was it only to have a nice sounding headline? Couldn't think of anything relevant to add as a seventh point, so just threw in something?
Touch screens are in, they're ubiquitous in the high tech cell phone/com device market (Don't think my HTC Touch Pro would be the same without it, honestly) and they're valuable tools for direct interaction with your data. They're also becoming more readily available in laptops and PCs. I don't believe we're gonna get away from keyboards and mice anytime soon, but the ability to tap your monitor to supplement the mouse is something I can get on-board with.
Beyond that, I'm not gonna talk much 'bout this article, the author likes to speak out both sides of his mouth. Read his review of the Aero UI aspects in http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9139254/Opinion_The_pros_and_cons_of_Windows_7_for_business
Here, have a quote: "Running Windows 7 with the all of the Aero UI elements enabled is a joy, and returning to XP after using it is a real letdown." - Michael Gartenberg, Oct 12, 2009
Is no one here using multiple monitors? If you are you'll notice that snap doesn't work. Well, it works on the left and right extremes and "snaps" the window to half the width of that display by default, but even on two displays it's not very helpful. Once you hit three or more displays it's more or less completely useless. Given that the API provides this information, I'm going to have to assume that the programmer who implemented the feature wasn't thinking very hard when he did so. Let's face it, it's not exactly rocket science. I've implemented exactly the same thing in my applications with multi-display support. It took about 30 minutes.
What monitor is that?