BlackBerry Storm2 hands-on and impressions


At a glance -- particularly as a non-Storm user -- you might say "wait a second, that's just a Storm." And in reality, you wouldn't be far off with that assessment. Put simply, this phone is less Storm "2" and more Storm "1.1" -- a hardware service pack, if you will, designed to correct very specific shortcomings in the original model while preserving the overall concept. We doubt RIM would come right out and put it that way, of course, but the fact that the Storm2 makes essentially no effort to look different than the Storm should be evidence enough.
So, what are those shortcomings, exactly? The big ones -- the ones that could ultimately convince a Storm user to upgrade -- are the addition of WiFi and a thorough revamping of SurePress. On the original Storm, SurePress consisted of a single mechanical switch mounted below the center of the display, leading to wobbly, uneasy clicks and -- far more devastatingly -- an inability to actuate more than one screen element at a time, which made the keyboard more of a hassle to use than it should've been. Don't get us wrong, we can understand RIM's impetus in creating SurePress; the company prides itself on producing devices with fabulous physical keyboards that make mobile email as painless of an experience as possible, and it wanted to port as much of that experience to a soft keyboard as it could. Ironically, in doing so, it actually made the transition harder for ex-8300 and 8800 users than a traditional soft keyboard would've. SurePress was so bad, in fact, that rumors had initially suggested the Storm2 would abandon it altogether in favor of a screen that stays in place when you press it (imagine that), but co-CEO Mike Lazaridis insisted that the technology was "here to stay." Indeed, the Storm2 keeps SurePress around but thoroughly revamps it by replacing the single mechanical switch with four piezoelectric ones mounted beneath the display's four corners.
The net effect of the Storm2's rethought SurePress is that it's unquestionably better -- but frankly, we still don't get it. Multiple keyboard actuations are now possible (shift plus a letter, for example), though it's not perfect -- things start to get flaky as your second press gets physically close to your first one, which makes some sense considering that the switches are placed at the screen's four corners. It generally works, but it's still a novelty; we can't think of a single good reason why you'd want your touchscreen to be able to click like this. What's worse, the Storm2's implementation requires a surprising amount of effort to actuate, meaning that long messages were a chore to type out -- not only do they wear out your fingers, but it gets old hearing the screen's loud "thunk" each and every time you type a letter, which we find considerably more noticeable than the traditional click of a physical QWERTY keyboard. It's also unclear why RIM bothered using fancy piezoelectric switches rather than simple mechanical ones, because they're not doing anything with the technology other than letting you click -- when you turn off the phone, the switches "harden" and prevent you from pressing the screen, but there's no option to keep that effect going when the device is on. For anyone who finds SurePress as distracting and unnecessary as we do, that omission alone could be the difference between buying a Storm2 and a Tour when you walk into the Verizon store.
Going back to the physical appearance of the phone for a moment, it's not necessarily a bad thing that it looks like the original Storm; apart from the fact that it's got a bit of infamy to outgrow, the old model was a pretty sharp-looking handset and the Storm2 refines that look in all the right ways. We're liking both the black chrome bezel and the touch-sensitive buttons, which eliminate virtually all of the visible gaps on the front of the phone to give it that smooth, slate-like appeal that full-touch handsets typically want to shoot for. The phone also feels great (SurePress click notwithstanding) -- as solid as the best-built physical QWERTY BlackBerrys, we'd say, but with the added benefit of tastefully rubberized volume, camera, and voice control buttons and a smooth, solid display covering almost all of the front of the phone.

Turning our attention to the software, the Storm2 runs BlackBerry OS 5.0 -- RIM's latest -- but as with virtually every new BlackBerry OS version in modern memory, it takes a keen eye and a long history of BlackBerry use to ferret out what has actually changed. As with the hardware itself, the Storm2's interface is all but identical to the Storm's 4.7 builds; the devil lies in the details, and to be fair, those details will be important for some users. Strictly from a usability standpoint, 5.0's addition of inertial scrolling throughout the platform makes a world of difference -- it works smoothly and effectively, and should be an effortless transition for anyone moving from another platform (like iPhone) that supports it. If you didn't like the Storm's overall look and feel, though, don't expect a revolution (or, really, even an evolution) here.

We don't want to harp on SurePress too much, but since there's a decided lack of physical QWERTY in play here, the Storm2's soft keyboards bear another mention. If you can get past the muscle fatigue-inducing clicks -- we couldn't, but who knows, we could be particularly weak-thumbed -- the layout and function of the keyboards is mediocre at best. For one thing, they don't look particularly good; white-on-black is always a tough scheme to pull off, and RIM didn't do itself any favors by skimping on the anti-aliasing and leaving keys looking exceptionally jaggy. Whatever, though; keyboards are about functionality, not appearance, right? We found ourselves making more mistakes than we should've on the portrait full QWERTY mode because the Storm2 lacks character pop-ups like you find on Android and the iPhone -- there's a blue glow cast on the key, which is all well and good except that... well, you're thumb isn't transparent. In portrait mode, even a small thumb can easily cover two keys, so it's impossible to tell with certainty which key is actuated. We also noticed that the keyboard doesn't contextually customize itself enough; from the screenshot above, for example, you can see that "Go" replaces the normal Enter key in the browser and there's a period key in place of the spacebar, but when entering email addresses, there's no @ key. Not a deal breaker, but again, for a company that prides itself in elegant input methods, this should be the best soft keyboard on the market today.
As much flak as the BlackBerry browser takes, we actually found it acceptable on the Storm2 -- likely a direct effect of RIM's alleged improvements made in 5.0. Inertial scrolling worked reasonably smoothly and new regions of the page that scroll into view load relatively quickly. We like to use Engadget as a baseline for testing devices because it's a fairly complicated page that tends to choke some mobile browsers, but it loaded drama-free on the Storm2. That's not to say it was a perfect experience: it takes forever to get past the "Requesting" phase and graphics look truly awful -- both a result of BIS' magic, we suspect. Ultimately, we'd take a good WebKit browser over this any day, but the platform just isn't there yet.

Wrap-up
As more modern mobile platforms become enterprise-savvy, RIM's on the cusp of losing its identity -- and products like the Storm and Storm2 prove that it's well aware of the situation. Only problem is, Waterloo is clearly woefully unequipped to handle the creation of exceptional, effortless usability that's demanded of a lustworthy mobile device these days. The Storm2 oozes most of the same personality traits espoused by its older brother -- traits that suggest a "Bold with a touchscreen" attitude -- and when you're fundamentally rethinking your device's user experience, that's not the right attitude to take.
For existing Storm owners who've been saying "if only this damn thing had WiFi" through clenched teeth for the past six months, the Storm2 makes an elegant, hassle-free replacement. For the rest of the world, though, we totally understand why Verizon has elected to bury the phone's launch beneath a pile of Google -- it's an underwhelming experience for today's multimedia-centric, ADHD-afflicted buyer.



























Overcoming objections is something you should expect from any salesperson, particularly those on commission.
anyone care to go toe to toe on bird law?
No, but perhaps we can swap recipes for milk steak sometime. Or maybe we can discuss the merits of raw jellybeans.
So the end conclusion is that BB needs a more iPhone like user experience?
Yeah end it now because anything that's not iPhone or Android base is fail in Engadgets eyes...
is your cat making TOO MUCH NOISE????
Do wasps make honey?
Bird Law, in this country, it's not governed by reason.
I would be interested, this could get dirty, allow me to sip this riot juice first.
Yes, I would like to. But we must be riding in a U Haul trailer to do so.
I don't know about this particular device, But enjoyed all my passed Rim Jobs.
Why's that guy in giant jacket? What is he hiding?
Riveting stuff...
who carries chestnuts around in their car?
Why don’t I strap on my job helmet and squeeze down into a job cannon and fire off into job land, where jobs grow on little jobbies?!
Well you know what they say ...
"You've got to pay the troll toll..."
Bird Law? You mean...Harvey Birdman?
@(Unverified) Your honor I would move to strike the evanescence from the previously mentions hereto fortnight and plainly my case has been made.
Dick towel dot com.
@(Unverified)
FILIBUSTER!!!!
"Fool me once", RIM...
Bottom line is the web browser is still a year away from being on equal footing with any other major touchscreen phone. Stick to what you're good at, RIM - plastic key qwerty messaging.
I guess I could never be an Engadget "reviewer" because I think the browser is decent. I haven't had any issues visiting my favorite sites. And if you don't like it, download Skyfire or Opera. If you're an iPhone user and don't like Mobile Safari go download, oh wait, you can't...
I agree, why didn't they just stick to what they know.... And (browsing issues aside) why didn't they make it so there's a mechanical switch under every key as opposed to one piezoelectric switch in each corner????
What sort of monkey designers do these people employ???
@Jaystar: this whole "oh wait... you can't" is getting a bit old. And in this case missinformed.
There are like 30 browsers in the Appstore, but i wouldnt know if they are any good, cause i never felt that Safari needs to be replaced. There are many things wrong with the iPhone, but Safari aint one.
Browser is bad - but I have a better time with it than with Opera or any of the other couple I've tried (still have one installed, but just don't use it.)
And SurePress is something you either get or don't get. I LOVE it - and just can't figure out why I wouldn't want what I call "two stage click" - to me (and to the other Storm lovers I know) the question is "why would I want to move my cursor AND click at the same time. . .?" This gives me a discrete separation between navigation and selection.
But it's different for different people. I don't figure the "other" method is better - it's just for those who like it. Which is awesome for them - sucks for me.
The BIGGEST problem, and the real killer for me, is the lack of EAS support (Exchange Active Sync) which EVERYONE but RIM now has. There are two third-party clients for Blackberry and they both suck (imho). If RIM would write one and make it work as well as their other apps, it would be a winner!
And I love my custom and automated skins - try that iPhone! :D
i don't understand what all the bitching about the shift key is about. there's 2 shift keys on the keyboard. if you're typing a letter close to one end, use the shift key on the other end, and vise versa. a real keyboard is like that too...
"And SurePress is something you either get or don't get. I LOVE it - and just can't figure out why I wouldn't want what I call "two stage click" - to me (and to the other Storm lovers I know) the question is "why would I want to move my cursor AND click at the same time. . .?" This gives me a discrete separation between navigation and selection."
I don't have a Storm or Storm2, but yes, this is exactly the reason (besides the keyboard) that they have SurePress and I can see the utility in that. The fact that it wasn't mentioned in the review leads me to believe that Chris had something of an axe to grind here. But oh well, reviews are opinions and at least he explains his thinking for the most part.
And i just got a Storm 3months ago...sucks to be me...
Make sure you upgrade to 5.0, this gives you all the Storm2's features except the improved SurePress screen.
Most people research before dropping Benjamins.
Some of us get money to purchase by a certain time and we have to get what we can when we can. It's why I got the Storm 1 - no Droid, no Palm Pre, and Storm 2 on some horizon we weren't quite sure about. . . so we gets what we gets.
If we did research and then waited for the next best thing, we'd always be waiting.
Not really. RIM has big things in store next year. Possibly the Dakota/Magnum will be released as will RIM updating it's browser etc... It already bought that webkit company and has signed on with adobe for flash etc...
Besides, the Storm2 is more like Storm1.5
If you own a Storm, there's not much incentive to upgrade. Yes it has more memory, WiFi and tighter surepress typing but it doesn't justify the upgrade just yet.
I own the Bold 9000 and there's no way i'm getting the 9700 which increases memory and camera, but decreases size and has weaker speakers. Trackpad is nice though.
some people got one for free. she likes it.
I think if you're not a power texter or typing e-mail's it's ok...
but how many people like that exist would get a BB, which is, essentially for power texters/mobile e-mailers.
the piezoelectric screen is cool, but doesn't feel the way I thought it would. It doesn't take away the need to press-release-press to type. They need to program it so some actions require the surepress ("Are you sure you want to do this?", menu selections, app opening, certain game actions, alternate key functions/characters), while typing just needs the touch (typing, browser scrolling).
Otherwise, just do away with the surepress.
sosay I.
(sigh)
I meant to say "I have a who got one free; she likes it."
oh, just @%@! it.
Damn, guess its 0-2 for the storm. It's a shame, I was really hoping the storm 2 to kick some but, better luck next time I guess.
Lets hope it does better than the V's latest offering:
http://wp.appadvice.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/chart3.jpg
OUCH!!
Unfortunately Verizon used up it's marketing budget on the Droid, so the Storm2 isn't going to get any love from VZW. The Storm2 is a kick ass phone in my opinion.
@Frank: What was that? WW sales for the iPhone vs. US-only sales for Droid? Skewed much?
Those numbers are probably right... Apple sold about 2.4 million of the first gen iPhone in it's first quarter -- that's approximately 800,000 a month. VZW sold over 1 million Storm's in it's first quarter. Not too shabby. I doubt Storm2 sales will come close to the first Storm though because Verizon desperately wants you to buy the Droid, which so far has barely sold 200,000 units.
@Sanskrit,
1st gen iPhone sales number for launch weekend is US-only, at least.
The first-gen Storm I have runs great on the v5.0 platform. Definetly upgrade.
Too bad they're 11 months too slow for most...
If you look at the original Storm review compared to this hands on of the Stom 2 the things they complain about are night and day differences for the most part. I don't know if it's just me but whoever wrote this article came off with a lot of bias.
Compare this iPhone to iPhone 3G hands on it's night and day difference even though they are essentially the same phone..
yeah, but what has always put me off about the storm is the moving screen to press. the video shows that it recognizes contact, it is a capacitive screen, but why not allow the option of just typing capacitively? Perhaps this is more of an "iphone experience" but I have never understood why a capacitive screen, which is incredibly accurate, needs to be supplemented with the button underneath. The wifi and newest software is awesome, if surepress had changed to a purely capacitive screen, I would buy one. But if the button is now even harder and louder, not for me.
It separates navigation from selection. It's just something you like or you don't like. Personally, I can't stand the "other" way - I always clicked when I was not intending to. . .now selection is a deliberate action - and I guess my thumbs are strong enough: I don't get muscle fatigue when texting a lot. . . :D
If only Engadget was this brutally honest all the time.
when do they sugarcoat reviews? Are they not allowed to actually LIKE a product, without being called biased? If they give the iPhone a good review, it's because it's a good phone, not because they're in Apple's pocket. Same thing goes for any other product.
A proper iPhone review would be how they blasted this phone and instead of saying "there's an app for that" scream out it's unacceptable...
Brutally ridiculous is more like it. It's clear from the beginning they just don't like the storm. I've owned 7 or 8 smart phones over the years, and sure-press is the best thing to ever come to a full touch screen phone. The only people who don't like it are people who base their opinions on 5 minutes of playing with the phone. "[B]ut frankly, we still don't get it," clearly you don't. If you are too big of a iphone fanboy to do a fair review, then find a new job.
I*click*r*click*e*click*a*click*l*click*l*click*y*click**click*l*click*i*click*k*click*e*click**click*m*click*y*click**click*s*click*t*click*o*click*r*click*m*click**click*2
That's an enterprise feature especially aimed at cafeine induced
stressed managers... it relaxes them when their phone gives them some
confirmation.