Welcome to the next Engadget
Welcome to the new Engadget, humans! As you can tell by taking a quick look around, we've been doing some major work on the site behind the scenes, and we couldn't possibly be more excited to finally share this work with the rest of the world. For months now -- nearly the whole year -- we've been tinkering, adjusting, tweaking, and honing the experience at Engadget with one goal in mind: do what we do as best as we can, and bring news to our readers better than anyone else. We think we've achieved that goal through a lot of hard work and long days (and nights), and it is truly awesome to finally be able to show everyone!
Obviously there is a ton of new stuff here, and if you're a long-time reader of the site, you'll probably be a little shell-shocked at first. Don't worry, we're still cranking out news the way we always have; in fact, we think the new design will allow us to crank even harder and provide more up-to-the-minute info to you guys. If you're a new reader, you picked the right time to check us out, because the site has never been more organized, had more content, or been more useful to someone who's reading us for the first time!
We just want to say that this has been a long labor of love, and we're thrilled that we get to share it with the world. We think that the new Engadget evolves our work in a major way, moving us from a straightforward blog into something else, an expandable amalgamation that fuses the good bits of blogs, social media, news sites, magazines, and video into something bigger than those parts.
We're going to walk you guys through some of the major new features (there are a ton, believe us), but first we want to talk a little about how the site got to where it is right now, and who the people are responsible for this thing. Read on after the break for all the info!
Update: Hey, we're having a few issues with the introduction of the new site. Hang tight, it'll be perfect soon!
First and foremost, the new Engadget is built from a collaboration between the editorial / developer team here, and the amazing, genius designers at Code & Theory -- a group responsible for sites such as The Daily Beast and Interview. We brought our huge stack of concepts and ideas to Code & Theory, and they managed to distill our dreams into reality. We tip our hats to the men and women there who focused what we wanted into the site you see today; their contribution to our new look and feel cannot be overstated.
Secondly -- but certainly not any less important -- are the teams on our side that put this thing together. Justin Glow and Dan Chilton (our resident developers... well Justin is on loan from Joystiq) took the beautiful skin that Code & Theory created and built the bones and guts with wildly creative code that we're using all over the place (really, everywhere). They upended what we thought was possible with our platform and our site; there is no way to accurately describe how instrumental they were in our relaunch, except to say this site wouldn't be here today without them. Amidst all the other work going on, the WIN design team helped put all the puzzle pieces into place, solved issues that had us scratching our heads, and made sure we were shipshape for launch. Team Blogsmith, the stewards of the amazing platform Engadget runs atop of, made some killer and clutch changes that let us make some of the magic you're seeing on the page. Without them, the new Engadget would have been only a dream!
The biggest change of all is probably the fact that we've somewhat merged our three main sites together. That is to say, where Engadget Mobile and Engadget HD were totally separate entities before, we're now able to share more content across the sites and allow for readers to more easily jump between the properties. We'll no longer have duplicate posts on the three sites either -- one post will exist, and will appear on whatever site is appropriate, perfectly syncing comments, galleries, and links. That has benefits beyond the front page, too. It means we can offer RSS feeds for all which omit duplicate stories, or give you a super feed of every story posted to every site, so there's no way you'll miss any piece of news. Keep in mind, Mobile and HD will keep their unique content and identity, but the new system will be somewhat different and might take a little adjusting to. We're confident that once you see how the sites play together, you'll love it as much as we do.
Besides that, we've got a bunch of new content and navigation here as well. We're figuring that most of you will just start clicking around like maniacs to check out what we've done (we don't read manuals either), but here's a few highlights anyway:
You'll notice some changes to comments which should make using the system and carrying on a conversation way more pleasant.
The first and probably biggest change is that we now have persistent logins, and permanent, dedicated usernames. That means two things; firstly, you can select a proper username for your account which will be PERMANENT and UNCHANGEABLE, meaning you get to have a real identity here (and that no one can take or duplicate your name once you've chosen it). Secondly, persistent logins mean you can just login at the top of the site (up in the header) once (like a real website!), and comment to your heart's content.
While both of these things are totally radical, you'll need to do a couple of things to get started. First, when you login with your current account, you should be prompted to pick a username. When selecting a username, take care to grab exactly what you want (using letters and numbers only, no special characters, and not case sensitive). You'll have that name forever. Since these are unique, they're pretty much first come first served, which means if you want to grab John Smith, you better get to the party early. No matter what, we can't help you get a username you want -- you have to come and register it and hope that it's available. Furthermore, there is the possibility that your old cookies may log you in without letting you pick a new username. That's bad because your account becomes unverified (as you can see above), which means your name won't display in comments at all, and we'll eventually delete all unclaimed accounts (the comments will stay, but the login info will no longer work and you'll have to create a new account).
The easiest way to correct this issue is to just jump to www.engadget.com/login (or the header up top) and logout. When you log back in with your CURRENT CREDENTIALS, you'll be asked to pick a new username, and boom: you're in. It's as simple as that. Again, we can't guarantee that you guys will get the exact name you want, but you're pretty creative -- we know you'll do okay.
Other than that, you'll see we've changed the look and feel of comments, and made some real improvements that make it easier to carry on a real conversation. We now provide "reply" links at the bottom of every comment, which means that you're actually answering the person you want to answer. On top of that, the comment will begin with an @username (don't worry, you can erase it), which specifically calls out the person you're talking to. It's a little Twitterism that we think is pretty handy here. You should also find that those annoying bugs with misplaced comments have left the building.
We've changed the display of comments too -- now when you downrank someone (as we know you guys love to do), their comment just disappears. For all the trolls out there, prepare to have your hearts broken. Also, we've made it so that the editors of the site can't be ranked at all. We think that it's important that everyone who reads the site can see what they have to say, and this is the most effective way to do that.
The team at Engadget, as well as Justin and Dan, WIN design, Blogsmith, Code & Theory, and a score of folks at AOL have been working tirelessly on this project for some considerable time. We've put a lot of blood, sweat, and tears into this, and it's incredible to finally take the wraps off!
Let me switch to the first person here for a moment. I just want to say a huge "thank you" to some specific folks who have supported this and helped make it happen. First and foremost is Josh Fruhlinger, the editorial director of the AOL Tech Network -- without him I am positive we never would have gotten this site relaunched, or done all the amazing things we've done with it. He has been instrumental in this project from day one. I'd also like to thank Marty Moe and Bill Wilson at AOL, who supported us from the get-go and trusted us to do what we wanted. Brad Hill, the director of Weblogs, Inc. was also incredibly supportive and positive about this and has been a great friend and champion of the site and our vision through this process. I also want to thank Victor Hasemen at AOL and Rob Sandie at Viddler for their vigilance on getting video right for the site.
One last person I would like to single out who has been incredibly gracious, patient, and helpful during this is Joystiq's Editor-in-chief Chris Grant. Not only did he allow us to yank Justin Glow on-board for this project, but he's helped me from day one with planning, visualizing, and executing some of these ideas we've had.
Lastly, I want to thank you guys -- the readers -- for reading this site through the years, and not just reading, but coming back for more and in greater numbers. At the end of the day, this thing is for you, and we hope that you enjoy the new site as much as we do. That said, we're open to any suggestions or comments on ways we can improve the experience or offer more. We view this as an iterative process, so we're not planning on stopping here at all. In fact, we're just getting things started.
Obviously there is a ton of new stuff here, and if you're a long-time reader of the site, you'll probably be a little shell-shocked at first. Don't worry, we're still cranking out news the way we always have; in fact, we think the new design will allow us to crank even harder and provide more up-to-the-minute info to you guys. If you're a new reader, you picked the right time to check us out, because the site has never been more organized, had more content, or been more useful to someone who's reading us for the first time!
We just want to say that this has been a long labor of love, and we're thrilled that we get to share it with the world. We think that the new Engadget evolves our work in a major way, moving us from a straightforward blog into something else, an expandable amalgamation that fuses the good bits of blogs, social media, news sites, magazines, and video into something bigger than those parts.
We're going to walk you guys through some of the major new features (there are a ton, believe us), but first we want to talk a little about how the site got to where it is right now, and who the people are responsible for this thing. Read on after the break for all the info!
Update: Hey, we're having a few issues with the introduction of the new site. Hang tight, it'll be perfect soon!
Site design / coding
First and foremost, the new Engadget is built from a collaboration between the editorial / developer team here, and the amazing, genius designers at Code & Theory -- a group responsible for sites such as The Daily Beast and Interview. We brought our huge stack of concepts and ideas to Code & Theory, and they managed to distill our dreams into reality. We tip our hats to the men and women there who focused what we wanted into the site you see today; their contribution to our new look and feel cannot be overstated.
Secondly -- but certainly not any less important -- are the teams on our side that put this thing together. Justin Glow and Dan Chilton (our resident developers... well Justin is on loan from Joystiq) took the beautiful skin that Code & Theory created and built the bones and guts with wildly creative code that we're using all over the place (really, everywhere). They upended what we thought was possible with our platform and our site; there is no way to accurately describe how instrumental they were in our relaunch, except to say this site wouldn't be here today without them. Amidst all the other work going on, the WIN design team helped put all the puzzle pieces into place, solved issues that had us scratching our heads, and made sure we were shipshape for launch. Team Blogsmith, the stewards of the amazing platform Engadget runs atop of, made some killer and clutch changes that let us make some of the magic you're seeing on the page. Without them, the new Engadget would have been only a dream!
Big changes

The biggest change of all is probably the fact that we've somewhat merged our three main sites together. That is to say, where Engadget Mobile and Engadget HD were totally separate entities before, we're now able to share more content across the sites and allow for readers to more easily jump between the properties. We'll no longer have duplicate posts on the three sites either -- one post will exist, and will appear on whatever site is appropriate, perfectly syncing comments, galleries, and links. That has benefits beyond the front page, too. It means we can offer RSS feeds for all which omit duplicate stories, or give you a super feed of every story posted to every site, so there's no way you'll miss any piece of news. Keep in mind, Mobile and HD will keep their unique content and identity, but the new system will be somewhat different and might take a little adjusting to. We're confident that once you see how the sites play together, you'll love it as much as we do.
Besides that, we've got a bunch of new content and navigation here as well. We're figuring that most of you will just start clicking around like maniacs to check out what we've done (we don't read manuals either), but here's a few highlights anyway:
- The homepage. We're really psyched on our new homepage. Not only can we surface big features and major stories we cover up in the strip at the top of the site (we call it the "hero module"), we're also able to surface a bunch of important / timely stories in our Top Stories cluster, which lets us push news we think is of particular interest right into your first view, giving you an overview of the last few hours of tech news in a single glance (you can also jump to the newest headline with just a click). You'll also note that we now have persistent navigation to all of the pages on the site (many of which are brand new)!
- New sidebar modules. We've totally revamped all of our sidebars and mini-content views. It would take a long time to go into all of the new functionality over there, but we're hooking into the site in all kind of new ways, and working to deliver better, more relevant content to readers. These will be updated frequently, and added to as time goes on, so keep your eyes to the right.
- Hubs. You've seen the basic hubs we used to have on the old Engadget, but we've totally juiced the new ones with more content and more dynamic ways of showing context. We're grouping our hubs into three main sections: products, topics, and events. The topic and event hubs include one of our favorite tools, the "Follow the saga" module, which lets you view a timeline of a product over weeks, months, and years. It's really cool -- check it out! Also, we plan on utilizing the event hubs for ongoing events, giving you a feed of our liveblog, while dynamically updating the content on that page. It will be truly awesome -- just wait.
- Proper video and gallery pages. Pretty simple, but we're really happy to have a place where you can peruse all of that extra content in a useful and enjoyable manner.
- New topics page with content sorting. Kinda says it all -- super easy way to find what you're looking for in any category.
- Better via and sourcing... and More Coverage. Vias and sources are now clearly displayed with the name of the sites where our stories are coming from, making it super simple to follow the breadcrumbs. Doubleplus good? We've added a new feature called More Coverage, which lets us aggregate links related to what we're reporting on. We're really psyched about this -- it gives us a chance to direct readers to stories that take a different angle on the news, go deeper, or we think are just plain worth reading. You'll start to see this all over the place, because we want to not just be a source for news, but a resource as well.
- Improved search. Our search tool still isn't Google level or anything, but we're now able to return not only relevant search results, but tag results and galleries. We suggest single word searches for the best results, but try phrases... you may get lucky!
- Archives. This one is especially awesome to us. See that calendar on the right side? Click on a date -- you'll get that full day's news, plus a really cool visualization -- something we call The Recap -- of the stories of the day crossed by time and comment activity. We think it's not only a nice looking piece of functionality, but helps give you a better idea of our ebb and flow of posts. We'll also be transporting that module to places like our daily roundup, allowing us to give you a better picture of where the news went that day in a more concise and clear manner.
Comments

You'll notice some changes to comments which should make using the system and carrying on a conversation way more pleasant.
The first and probably biggest change is that we now have persistent logins, and permanent, dedicated usernames. That means two things; firstly, you can select a proper username for your account which will be PERMANENT and UNCHANGEABLE, meaning you get to have a real identity here (and that no one can take or duplicate your name once you've chosen it). Secondly, persistent logins mean you can just login at the top of the site (up in the header) once (like a real website!), and comment to your heart's content.
While both of these things are totally radical, you'll need to do a couple of things to get started. First, when you login with your current account, you should be prompted to pick a username. When selecting a username, take care to grab exactly what you want (using letters and numbers only, no special characters, and not case sensitive). You'll have that name forever. Since these are unique, they're pretty much first come first served, which means if you want to grab John Smith, you better get to the party early. No matter what, we can't help you get a username you want -- you have to come and register it and hope that it's available. Furthermore, there is the possibility that your old cookies may log you in without letting you pick a new username. That's bad because your account becomes unverified (as you can see above), which means your name won't display in comments at all, and we'll eventually delete all unclaimed accounts (the comments will stay, but the login info will no longer work and you'll have to create a new account).
The easiest way to correct this issue is to just jump to www.engadget.com/login (or the header up top) and logout. When you log back in with your CURRENT CREDENTIALS, you'll be asked to pick a new username, and boom: you're in. It's as simple as that. Again, we can't guarantee that you guys will get the exact name you want, but you're pretty creative -- we know you'll do okay.
Other than that, you'll see we've changed the look and feel of comments, and made some real improvements that make it easier to carry on a real conversation. We now provide "reply" links at the bottom of every comment, which means that you're actually answering the person you want to answer. On top of that, the comment will begin with an @username (don't worry, you can erase it), which specifically calls out the person you're talking to. It's a little Twitterism that we think is pretty handy here. You should also find that those annoying bugs with misplaced comments have left the building.
We've changed the display of comments too -- now when you downrank someone (as we know you guys love to do), their comment just disappears. For all the trolls out there, prepare to have your hearts broken. Also, we've made it so that the editors of the site can't be ranked at all. We think that it's important that everyone who reads the site can see what they have to say, and this is the most effective way to do that.
Wrap-up
The team at Engadget, as well as Justin and Dan, WIN design, Blogsmith, Code & Theory, and a score of folks at AOL have been working tirelessly on this project for some considerable time. We've put a lot of blood, sweat, and tears into this, and it's incredible to finally take the wraps off!
Let me switch to the first person here for a moment. I just want to say a huge "thank you" to some specific folks who have supported this and helped make it happen. First and foremost is Josh Fruhlinger, the editorial director of the AOL Tech Network -- without him I am positive we never would have gotten this site relaunched, or done all the amazing things we've done with it. He has been instrumental in this project from day one. I'd also like to thank Marty Moe and Bill Wilson at AOL, who supported us from the get-go and trusted us to do what we wanted. Brad Hill, the director of Weblogs, Inc. was also incredibly supportive and positive about this and has been a great friend and champion of the site and our vision through this process. I also want to thank Victor Hasemen at AOL and Rob Sandie at Viddler for their vigilance on getting video right for the site.
One last person I would like to single out who has been incredibly gracious, patient, and helpful during this is Joystiq's Editor-in-chief Chris Grant. Not only did he allow us to yank Justin Glow on-board for this project, but he's helped me from day one with planning, visualizing, and executing some of these ideas we've had.
Lastly, I want to thank you guys -- the readers -- for reading this site through the years, and not just reading, but coming back for more and in greater numbers. At the end of the day, this thing is for you, and we hope that you enjoy the new site as much as we do. That said, we're open to any suggestions or comments on ways we can improve the experience or offer more. We view this as an iterative process, so we're not planning on stopping here at all. In fact, we're just getting things started.























Been reading engadget for a long time now .. the new look is awesome .. not to over the top but a bit more professional .. very nice.
Awesome job, I'm loving the new look!
So I've been an ushamed "Endgadgict" for a few years, logging in far too often everyday to get my fix. Well my addiction is cured, I'm an Endadgict no more! Engadget still has the best articles and editorial team, but after a few days trying to read the 20+ font styles on the new site my eyes hurt, I've a headach and just p***d off that my favourite read is no more.
For anyone else wanting to do a comparison, head over to Engadget.de which still uses the old styles. In fairness there's a lot I like about the new mechanics, it's the presentation that sucks so badly. So here's my penneth's worth........
The good:
1. "we've somewhat merged our three main sites together":
Great idea and works well
2. Logins
Way, way better, thanks guys
3. Persistent navigation
Basic but very handy
4. Hubs. "we've totally juiced the new ones with more content and more dynamic ways of showing context."
These look and feel great and will be a superb tool when researching what Netbook or gizmo to buy
5. Archives
Title list is a great tool, no idea what the recap vizualization is for.
6. The Homepage
Looks great as a piece of in your face poster graphics but......
The Bad
1. The Homepage
As I said before, it looks very bold, bright and fresh but It's a complete mess to read, especially the fonts. Why oh why would anyone use times roman on a site today? Add to that the tiny body font and complete mish mash of other styless and you have zero consistency. The site is no longer a pleasure to read, surely the key idea? Article titles are also a disaster (no HTML so can't copy to messenger). Code & theory should be fired on the spot.
2. The strip at the top of the site (we call it the "hero module"):
This is bigger than many webpages and a complete waste of space, especially as you can no longer see the first article when you load the site, duh! Save this stuff for the sidebar where it belongs. I'll re-christen this the Zero module......
3. "we're also able to surface a bunch of important / timely stories in our Top Stories cluster, which lets us push news we think is of particular interest right into your first view"
Comments as before, keep it in the sidebar so as we can actually see the articles. Nice idea, badly implemented.
4. "New sidebar modules. We've totally revamped all of our sidebars and mini-content views. It would take a long time to go into all of the new functionality over there, but we're hooking into the site in all kind of new ways, and working to deliver better, more relevant content to readers"
So where is the better content? So far it's another mashup of feeds, crappy graphics, kindergarten graph paper and over-bold fonts. This is the side bar, not main content, so keep it more subtle please as it distracts from the core site. (I'm not saying get rid of it, just soften it!!!)
5. Proper video and gallery pages.
When will the video start working? Just get a 'loading video information' picture and nothing more
6. "Archives. This one is especially awesome to us."
The recap is very pretty, some impressive coding but a complete waste of time and effort; what purpose does it serve? However as noted above, the list of titles is nice and will be good for catching up.
So to sum it all up, some great ideas ruined by the acid trip web design that puts form before function. It does look pretty, but is just such a poor read I'm giving up and looking for a new 'everyday' blog that's easier on the eye.
Here's hoping someone takes notice, and the editorial team start respionding to the hundreds of similar comments. The silence is nearly as bad as the design.........
I liked the previous search method. This one does not allow you to sort results by date added. I like to search this way to see when things happened / what order things happened.
I just came here today and saw the new engadget. I typed that phrase, "new engadget" into the search box and couldn't find anything relevant nor useful. I had to go to Google which pointed me to a Digg article that had in their comments the link to the engadget story about the new site. I see that the word new is not used in the article and maybe that's why it didn't show up, but nonetheless, I was shocked and upset at there not being a way to sort results by date.
The new layout and design is awesome! Thanks for your hard work!!
Well being a first timer to the site I'm already starting to really like it. Im not sure how the old format was but I like this format. Its easy to find things and thats what I want, to come to the site and just find when I want to read and learn something new. Keep up the good work.
Is it possible to change the default font, it really hurts my eyes?
As much as I like Engadget, the new look and feel really seems cluttered and busy so I'm hoping this is just a something I need to get used to :(
SLOW. Freezes Firefox. Have to "log in" now to leave comments?? WTF? Is this a bank?
Also, what happened to the wap site? Yeah, I use that one b/c it's fast and clean, or at least it used to be, seems to be gone now????
I like the changes, but it looks like you can no longer sort the search results by date, so the most recent posts are at the top. Or am I missing something?
Site's still as slow, coming close to removeing engadget from oft-visited tab folder...
Clutter much? I hate the new format. Youve got it made. flashy colors, unusable pages (404 error on everything), and my favorite is the over sized pictures you guys are now using.. they simply add to the clutter of what used to be a decent webpage.
Not that it probably matters, but seriously, I hate the New Engadget. It's ugly and harder to use. I'm a daily engadget reader (and podcast listener) so I generally come to the site, read the first page and blink out. All of that neo-hub stuff at the top is just a barrier to what I want to read, and the stuff on the side is either really ugly (those colors! yuck) or uninteresting (the quote, 7 out of ten times) or counter intuitive (as much as I love engadget, I don't relate individual posts to distinct days, so why have a calendar; could it be possibly faster than just searching?)
I'm surprised that Josh is so high on this, given the harsh criticism through the site and podcast about things that don't work well. This looks like a re-boot that is focused on flash, and not substance, and was done for the purposes of saying you did an update. I'm not going to say that I'm running to Gizmodo because I hate the New Engadget; I've always read Gizmodo too, AFTER engadget. But now I'm going to start there
Oh you guys are assholes.
I wanted " beats&melody " and nowhere on the username creation page does it say SPECIAL CHARACTERS NOT ALLOWED. Well, maybe it does, I did it from the password recovery page which also has a login page. That's another thing that bugged me, after logging out my password didn't work and I had to reset it.
After giving it a good reading, I'll resume in a sentence: "Ugly as hell". I do miss the old format. These fonts are **terrible**.
I don't know if anyone has already mentioned this, but the formatting is kind of screwy on the iPhone-- all the text on any given page is really hard snapped to the left of the screen-- not even one pixel to spare-- it makes it a little hard to read because of black letters and the black screen edge... I find that I keep trying to move the text away from the edge like I could with the old site--
The "Newer Posts" and "Older Posts" are backwards compared to "industry standard"... I find it extremely off-putting!
No.
I keep thinking I am reading gizmodo, except there is a double banner at the top.
Seriously, if it wasn't for the top section, it would work. But it really is a mess up there. Whoever designed it that thought that a banner on top followed by what by glance seems a banner in the next section should get their eyes removed.
It's total crap. Get rid of one of the top sections and change the color from black back to engadget blue.
Or what do I know, maybe you are trying to look like gizmodo.
Oh wait....I see you were "working on it with AOL".
Really?
Seriously?
Why would a website about technology have ANYTHING to do with AOL? You should be ashamed.
But it does explain a lot about how this looks.
I don't think the serif font works as well as it could on Endgaget. The font should be made larger by default so that the inherent low resolution of computer monitors can display the serif font better. I am using Times New Roman on my website at http://www.multimediaforlife.co.uk , you can see how I have made the font larger than normal on the body text, and this can help to alleviate problems with serif fonts not displaying very well.
Since this post was so long ago I dont know if a question would be answered..but here goes...
Why do I have to have a seperate Log in for this AOL site? Why couldn't Engadget incorporate AOL's native login system? I would rather have one login(AOL/AIM Screen name) rather than a whole new log in..
Anyway thats just my thoughts! Love the redesign though!
Where's account management to update our email address?
Can not seem to find an answer in the Q&A or anywhere else.
Is it possible to find a history off all my comments? Get a list of what comments were made in their respective articles?
I know I'm late to the party, but I need to vent!
Horrible. That sums up this "redesign". Site takes forever to load in IE, with Script problems/errors on EVERY page. In a year, I've posted a comment once, but this redo spurred me to speak up.
I come to this site everyday, often multiple times, but not sure anymore. My phone (winmo) won't go to articles I click on anymore, I had to move to firefox (on my laptops) just to submit this comment, because the "submit" button doesn't even show up on IE.
I love your wit, sarcasm, and reporting, but wow, what a complete FAIL!
As a previous poster said, you guys are so harsh on products that miss the mark, I find it incredible you guys brought this live.
Perhaps a lot more testing, and a little more humility in the future would be a good start.
Ugh. I've been using it for a while and I'm just not liking it at all. I'm running at 1920 X 1200 and I STILL can't see the first post until I scroll or hit your Jump to the latest posts link.
Just short of 50% of the screen is taken up by that banner ad at the top.
Terrible. I've been a long time reader of Engadget and this is a shame.
I like the comment reply format. Keeps off-topic fools from posting as replies to be on the first page.
Other than that... The contrast is harsh and the format is just plain ugly.
I liked the design that I saw earlier today ;-)
Loose the much too big Top Stories with pictures..,
OR integrate them (let's say 4 of them) into the the menu of big reviews (like the DROID review)
That would look much smoother PLUS newest stories are on the first screen ;)
I hope that's understandable and that you consider my input =)
Long live Engadget!
OR make the Top Stories retractable so that every user has the choice if he wants them. and of course save these preferences in a cookie ;)
*yummy*
New site looks like ass, the grey and light blue looks horrific reminds me of the equally terrible be broadband site here, another redesign monstrosity:
https://www.bethere.co.uk/web/beportal/homepage
This site looks like it crawled out of a 90's geocities archive.
I like the new look. It doesn't look like "just a blog" kind of site anymore
I agree that the serif main story font seems harder to read, maybe that's just because my eye has become accustomed to sans-serif fonts on the web. I think most of the (admittedly limited) research that has been done on the matter has indicated that sans-serif fonts ARE easier to read on computer screens, though.
More egregious though, is the constant intermixing of serif and sans-serif fonts. For example, these comments have serifs on the post header but not on the body. The comment entry box has sans serif and serif fonts mixed up all around it. It's a visual jumble and makes it much harder to read than it needs to be.
Hi there, after reading your page for ages, i see you have changed the layout
i would like to complain that:
1. to see the first post on the front page now requires scrolling down (even on my 1200 pixel high screen)
2. the top roundup graphic which has replaced the first post makes no sense as it contains effectively 4 different font colours and has random sized images.
3. before the last update it was simple, you logged in and see the first post, immediately telling you if anything is different etc...
4. also the whole page freezes for about 4 seconds on my 8-core mac before you can scroll down on most pages...whereas it was almost instant scrolling available before
regards
adrian
Ok Engadget, I have tried give your new design time to sink in, and I must say that it is mostly a pain in the ass.
I will admit that at first glance the site looks slick and beautiful, but after using for some time now (I check the site several times a day) I find it about as un-user friendly as Gizmodo and Lifehacker.
1.Unless you read from right to left, or have your scroll bar on the left, the link to go to older pages is obnoxiously inconvenient. I have not seen any other blog that uses a left justified and left pointed button to access more information. And yes I worded it that way because I understand the idea of 'going back in time' logically seems to the left. But that only counts if when you want to get more information is always to the right. With blogs, you are always at the end of the book. So there. Two logical reasons to stay in the mainstream and put the older post nav back on the right.
2.I am sick of having to scroll past the top stories every time I go to the next page. Maybe if they did not fill my screen I would not be as annoyed. The browser tools and the add take up the third of screen real estate, your Engadget Show banner and tabs take up the next third, and then another set up tools/tabs and your "Top Stories" takes up the last third. Yes, I have found the "jump to the posts" button, but that just seems like a sad excuse to fix the problem of not seeing what I come to you for.
3.Ok so most of what I don't like at the top of the page use to be conveniently out of the way on the side. Why did you have to move it? Because you filled up the side with annoying metrics and crap. Ok, I like the ARCHIVES. That is a brilliant idea to be able to jump to a date. But the rest of it!?!?!?!?! Featured/Breaking: You already have top stories at the top. Seems redundant. Quoted: Could have the size. Most Commented: Could be shrunk to half the size, but personally I don't give a crap. I don't read Engadget to read the comments of the unwashed masses, so I don't care about the metrics of what they are commenting on. KIRF: shrink it!
On Twitter: If I was into Twitter, I would be looking at Twitter not your blog site.WORTHLESS! Game Changer:Shrink it. Editors@Twitter: same as my twitter comment.GET RID OF IT! Gadget Stats: Shrink it.
Since there doesn't seem to be any forum for discussing the site other than this post, I'll mention some thoughts on recent changes.
I like the auto-expanded threads, more like they used to be, but it might be a good idea (for those who thought the change was a good idea) to give an option on that.
I like the serif font, despite what many say. Typography studies say that blocks of text are best in a serif font, because it's easier for the eye to track.
We still want to be able to edit our own posts, or at least amend them.
My main want: To be able to see all posts in a single listing. Right now, I have to go down the main site, and Mobile, and HD to make sure I haven't missed anything. Most of those posts are duplicate, since most posts are in two lists if not in all three. But some are only in one of the sub-lists, and I don't want to miss them.