Ion Netbooks ComparedSee all photos
|ASUS Eee PC 1201N ($499.99)
ASUS Eee PC 1201NSee all photos
|Lenovo IdeaPad S12 ($649.00)
Lenovo IdeaPad S12See all photos
|HP Mini 311 ($474.99)
HP Mini 311See all photos
|Samsung N510 ($599.99)
Samsung N510See all photos
Round 1: Design
When it comes to aesthetics, the Lenovo, Samsung and ASUS all closely resemble their smaller netbook siblings, and their glossy, fingerprint-loving lids and black matte keyboards decks exude a pseudo-professional look. The Lenovo's light circular dot pattern gives it some difference, but overall all three look quite similar. We did appreciate the small differences though, like the tear drop power button nestled on the Samsung's hinge, and the pearl-like decoration on the Lenovo. But it's really HP that manages to hit on both portability and design. We really liked the Mini 311's subtle, swirly pattern on its white lid and the contrasting silver keyboard and palmrest. And as fingerprint-smudged lids really drive us nuts, it didn't hurt that the lid didn't leave any traces of our slimy hands.
Round 2: Keyboard, touchpad and screen
All the touchpads were comfortable. But HP continues to have an Achilles heel when it comes touchpads: the Mini 311's pad is positioned too close to the keyboard, and when we typed our palm repeatedly moved the cursor to a different location on the screen. Because you can't turn the touchpad off, we did figure out how best to angle our hands, but it was quite peeving. Both the Samsung and ASUS have multitouch pads, and we're happy to report two finger scrolling worked fine, although the single mouse buttons were lame and we preferred to double tap. In the end, Lenovo's wide pad and firm, dedicated right and left buttons provided the best all-around experience.
While the ASUS and Lenovo have 12.1-inch displays, HP and Samsung went with smaller 11.6-inchers -- though they're really not noticeably smaller to the naked eye. Lenovo's screen has a 1200 x 800 resolution, but the rest have 1366x768 resolutions, which makes viewing HD content crisp and clear. However, the glare caused by the glossy screens on the ASUS, Lenovo and HP is extremely noticeable and results in poor horizontal viewing angles when trying to share the screen with a friend. We did, however, take a liking to the viewing angles on the Samsung N510's matte screen, and the fact that we didn't have to look at our reflection every time the screen turned dark in a game or video. Though Samsung's screen was better in terms of pure quality, this round still goes to Lenovo for superb ergonomics.
Round 3: Overall performance
Okay, here's the big surprise. Though NVIDIA says Ion should have no impact on everyday performance, the Samsung, HP and the Lenovo felt slower than other Atom N270 and N280 netbooks we've tested. Though it's not really reflected in the benchmarks, we noticed it taking longer for the machines to open programs, and when working in Firefox with a handful of tabs they just lagged more than others. In an informal stopwatch test it took the Lenovo and Samsung 2.5 seconds to open Firefox with no other programs running, while it took the standard N280-based HP Mini 5101 1 second. Similarly, it took the Lenovo 8 seconds, the Samsung 6 seconds to open the same 1.5MB PDF in Adobe Acrobat 9, while both the standard HP Mini 5101 and the next-gen Atom N450-based Eee PC 1005PE opened it in 3 seconds flat.
So while Ion promised better performance, these netbooks feel more sluggish in everyday tasks. And though we've heard theories trying to explain it -- including Liliputing's about increased screen resolution causing more strain on the CPU -- all we actually know is that these results are disappointing. Sure, all these laptops will capably handle your web surfing and light application needs, but the inescapable fact is that a netbook which costs $200 less will probably do it faster.
|PDF Open Times||GIMP Open Times|
|ASUS Eee PC 1201N (Win 7 SE)||3.5 sec||21 sec|
|HP Mini 311 (XP)||5 sec||24 sec|
|Lenovo IdeaPad S12 (Win 7 SE)||8 sec
|Samsung N510||6 sec||33 sec|
|ASUS Eee PC 1005PE (Intel Atom N450)*||3 sec||21 sec|
|HP Mini 5101 (Intel Atom N280)*||3 sec||20 sec|
The HP, Lenovo and Samsung all may come equipped with standard, single-core Atom processors, but the Eee PC 1201N's dual-core 1.66GHz Atom N330 processor showed no hurt. And as we mentioned in our full review of the 1201N, it felt much snappier in everyday use than any of the N270 or N280 Atom netbooks we've tested, and the benchmark chart below echoes that.
|ASUS Eee PC 1201N (Win 7 SE)||1106||2208|
|HP Mini 311 (XP)||957||2016|
|Lenovo IdeaPad S12 (Win 7 SE)||833||1394|
|ASUS Eee PC 1005PE (Intel Atom N450)||942||1431|
|HP Mini 5101 (Intel Atom N280)||920||1650|
Round 4: Graphics and HD performance
Graphics and multimedia performance, on the other hand, blew us away -- Ion undoubtedly provides better multimedia handling, even if it's at the expense of everyday performance. All four of the netbooks were able to play a Blu-ray clip at a full 1080p resolution, smoothly stream a YouTube 1080p clip with Flash 10.1 installed, and handle some mainstream games -- all things we couldn't do with the HP Mini 5101 or the Pine Trail-powered MSI Wind U135. But as you'd expect, the Eee PC 1201N's stronger CPU helped it to notch better benchmarks and framerates than the other systems. Playing Batman: Arkham Asylum at 1024 x 768 resolution was noticeably speedier on the ASUS than with the Lenovo IdeaPad S12.
|ASUS Eee PC 1201N (Win 7 SE)||1555||30|
|HP Mini 311 (XP)||1464||29|
|Lenovo IdeaPad S12 (Win 7 SE)||1243||21|
|ASUS Eee PC 1005PE||157||---|
|HP Mini 5101||128||---|
Quick note: the Samsung N510 and HP Mini 311 have an Ion LE chipset. The only difference between LE and regular Ion is that the LE version disables support for DirectX10, but if you're up for the challenge you could always try and hack it.
Round 5: Battery life
|Battery Life on video rundown|
|ASUS Eee PC 1201N (Win 7 SE)||2:26:00|
|HP Mini 311 (XP)||3:53:00|
|Lenovo IdeaPad S12 (Win 7 SE)||2:40:00|
|ASUS Eee PC 1005PE||8:10:00|
|HP Mini 5101||5:45:00|
NVIDIA claims that Ion has minimal effects on battery life; we'd beg to differ. Despite the fact that each netbook was outfitted with a higher-capacity six-cell battery, none of them lasted longer than four hours on our HD video rundown test. Both the ASUS and the Lenovo got less than three hours, which is incredibly low for a modern ultraportable or netbook. Nevertheless, the Mini 311 posted the best time at 3 hours and 51 minutes -- far short of the standard Atom-based HP Mini 5101's six hours, and not even close to the eight hours we got from the Pine Trail-equipped ASUS Eee PC 1005PE.
We're sad to say that we're a little disappointed in this crop of Ion netbooks -- we've waited over a year for them to arrive, and, well, it's just not last year anymore. While the $499 Eee PC 1201N is our choice of the group since it doesn't sacrifice performance for added graphics, it still feels dated in some ways: Intel's next generation Pine Trail Atom has just been released and you can get a comparable ULV laptop for just a few more bucks. You'll have to ask yourself if the improved graphics and multimedia capabilities of these machines are worth the decrease in performance and battery life the Ion chipset seems to involve -- and whether that tradeoff is worth an extra $200 over a typical netbook. In the end, we just feel like this is all too little, too late, and maybe NVIDIA knows it too -- Ion 2 is supposedly right around the corner. Let's just hope we don't have to wait another year.