Samsung 700Z OLED photo frame hands-on


A look back on popular stories from today in a specific year.

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Looks nice, have been after a digital photo frame for AGES, but the majority are utter tosh. I did in fact buy one from Polaroid which was nice apart from the defective glowing green pixel smack in the middle.. DIxons grudgingly took it back.
Does this one need to be plugged into the mains power? It'd be nice to have one w/o trailing leads. Also with these picture frames the trend seems to be to turn them into a "does it all picture frame" with WiFi, touch screen, radio, movies, coffee maker etc. I don't want and of these features, just an SD card slot and a decent high res screen....
Suppose I should read the specs for this one....
@OrsonX
Most of these frames require external power
AWESOME OLED SCREEN → Camera Optics → Camera Sensor → JPEG compression → TN panel LCD → :(
Theoretically, OLED tech should use less power than LCD tech (CCFL or LED), so it could be battery powered and require charging from time to time. It would require a side by side comparison. Kodak has been selling an OLED picture frame for quite some time, but as the price is up there ($999), we'll have to wait what the price tag will be.
As Sammy has a netbook with OLED screen of the same size, this probably sports the same 1024x600 resolution.
Most expensive photoframe ever and it doesn't look to save any space either. Why can't we have a laptop with oled rather than a useless photo frame.
@cdf74dc9 The KODAK one? True enough, but the Samsung is reported as having a RRP $300
Is that an hdmi port on it?