@JJ for the types of screens it makes more sense if it used face tracking cameras to simulate 3D. since that sort of technology only works on 1 person and 22 inch screens are more personal than 40 inch tv's,
Gaming love - Indeed! All the above comments (& previous comments on similar 3D articles) give a good account of all the pros & cons of the different systems.... but what about (laptop) gaming? SURELY this is where the revolution will start and stem outwardly from? It is just SO obvious! The user is at a pretty fixed distance, the screen is relatively small (& cheep) the graphics card can EASILY cope and a FPS will never be the same again!
If Battlefield 3 came out as Battlefield 3D then I would never get any work (or anything else) done ever again!!!!
Why isn't the 3D-PC reality now?!
[PS: regarding specs or not. I saw the NASA 3D vid whilst at CK which uses polarised glasses, an interesting (but not compelling) effect.. but after 30 min my brain was mashed!]
The phone has 256MB of RAM and a 1GHz processor, which do the job reasonably well, though the Anna interface will likely leave something to be desired for many smartphone users.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Who cares about expensive large screen t.v's, lets see this type of screen in a cheaper smaller 22 inch puppy as a monitor or a notebook.
Gimmie some 3D gaming love....
@JJ for the types of screens it makes more sense if it used face tracking cameras to simulate 3D. since that sort of technology only works on 1 person and 22 inch screens are more personal than 40 inch tv's,
@JJ
Gaming love - Indeed! All the above comments (& previous comments on similar 3D articles) give a good account of all the pros & cons of the different systems.... but what about (laptop) gaming? SURELY this is where the revolution will start and stem outwardly from? It is just SO obvious! The user is at a pretty fixed distance, the screen is relatively small (& cheep) the graphics card can EASILY cope and a FPS will never be the same again!
If Battlefield 3 came out as Battlefield 3D then I would never get any work (or anything else) done ever again!!!!
Why isn't the 3D-PC reality now?!
[PS: regarding specs or not. I saw the NASA 3D vid whilst at CK which uses polarised glasses, an interesting (but not compelling) effect.. but after 30 min my brain was mashed!]