I've always heard anything encryption with less then a 256-bit cipher is useless...I mean you can easily break 8 and 16 bit by hand...64 bit as well with a little bit more work...why did they even bother with the old standard.
Name
Email
Reason
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I've always heard anything encryption with less then a 256-bit cipher is useless...
I mean you can easily break 8 and 16 bit by hand...64 bit as well with a little bit more work...why did they even bother with the old standard.