Dell Mini 10 with Broadcom Crystal HD Accelerator review

Editor's Note: This review has been updated since Flash 10.1 Beta 3 was released.
Look and feel

Beyond that, Dell scratched the previous chassis of its Minis for a more rounded, wedge-shaped lower half. But the odd shape has purpose -- the back of the system is wider so that it can house its six-cell battery, rather than have it hang off the back. We're into the design, but it's much chunkier than other netbooks. And the three-pound,1.3-inch thick Mini 10 is noticeably heavier and wider than the 2.6-pound Acer Aspire One 532h and Toshiba NB305. Of course, with all that extra space the Mini 10 has the room to house the standard netbook ports, including three USB ports, VGA, Ethernet, SD card slot, and a headphone and microphone jack. Unfortunately there's no HDMI port -- Dell tells us the Pineview chipset doesn't support it, despite its claimed HD prowess.
Keyboard, touchpad and screen

While we could have done with a smaller, less glossy bezel, the 1366 x 768 screen is high quality and much roomier than the usual 1024 x 600 netbook resolution. Watching a 1080p clip of Up in the Air was crisp, and viewing angles were decent, but the screen is so glossy that getting it set to an angle where you aren't staring at yourself takes skill.
Performance, HD playback and battery life

So, does the Broadcom Crystal HD accelerator put an end to our netbook HD woes? Our answer is a resounding "kind of."
Though the Mini 10 will not come preinstalled with Adobe's Flash 10.1 Beta 3 or the updated Broadcom drivers that support it, users can download those tools and enjoy watching streaming HD content. And after making sure everything was installed, that's exactly what we did! A number of 1080p movie trailers played surprisingly smoothly both in the smaller screen YouTube player and when upped to the full screen. Need some proof? Check out the video below of the Mini 10 handling YouTube HD and some other 1080p CBS.com HD clips. While the playback was nice and smooth, we did have a few browser crashes here and there which we will blame on Flash 10.1's beta status.
As for downloaded HD content, a 1080p WMV video of dolphins and the Iron Man 2 trailer from Apple's site played smoothly in Windows Media Player 11 -- something we'd hoped Pine Trail netbooks would do on their own. However, because Broadcom only supports Windows Media Player, that same MOV was like watching a slide-show in QuickTime. We're pretty happy we figured that out before we went and purchased Iron Man in HD from iTunes. In turn, because Windows Media Player 11 doesn't support Blu-ray playback, and Broadcom's other software partners haven't released players yet (we're told ArcSoft is working on one), playing a Blu-ray disc if you happen to have an external drive isn't an option at the moment.
Our sense here is that the Broadcom chip will be a fine solution for those who just want to watch online videos once Flash 10.1 Beta 3 and a supported Blu-ray player is out -- you'll be able to hit your favorite streaming sites and playback most local video you have. But it's still no more than a Band-Aid on Pine Trail's graphics woes -- unlike Ion, it won't help with gaming or video encoding, and the Mini 10's low 3DMark scores second that.
| PCMark05 | 3DMark06 | Battery Life | |
| Dell Mini 10 (Pine Trail, Broadcom Crystal HD) | 1264 | 132 | 5:58 |
| HP Mini 311 (Ion) | 2016 | 1464 | 3:53 |
| Toshiba Mini NB305 (Pine Trail) | 1272 | 156 | 6:30 |
| Acer Aspire One 523h (Pine Trail) | 1310 | 154 | 6:31 |
| ASUS Eee PC 1005PE (Pine Trail) | 1431 | 157 | 8:10 |
With a 56Wh, six-cell battery, the Mini 10 lasted 5 hours and 58 minutes on our video rundown test, which loops the same SD video at 65 percent brightness. While that'll let you leave the charger at home for most of the day, it isn't as long as the other Pine Trail netbooks, and nowhere near the Eee PC 1005PE's eight hours on that same test. When just used for surfing the web and listening to streaming music through YouTube, the Mini 10 lasted about seven and a half hours. We did really appreciate that Dell ships the system with a clean desktop, though the Dell dock is locked to the top of the screen for easy access to Windows applications.
Wrap-up




























nice work, Dell, looking good!
@jerm
This is all George Bush's fault.
Sweet! I've been holding off on getting a new machine until Crystal Accelerators were available.
If it's also got Blast Processing, I'm totally getting one!
@(Unverified) All computers have Blast Processing! It's called Gens!
@(Unverified) Those processors surely made anyone's senses perked up. If you think dell mini 10 price is a bit too much for you, its tablet version mini 5 which boast might fit into your liking. It's an oddly satisfying implementation of a camera, in a super sizing kind of way.
This will be dell's flagship for their tablet device. More Details: http://bit.ly/dell-mini-5-details
That's not a netbook! Maybe by size, but that's way thick! Looks like a toaster oven on its side.
@OsoOto
Err... what? It looks about normal to me.
@Vance No, it looks like a laptop that gained weight, lost it and now it's all gone to it's hips, (Or hinge?)
@OsoOto I agree. My humongous Vaio FW is just as thick (1.3") but looks thinner. This thing looks way too fat for a netbook (think Asus Seashell).
I know this is a dumb question, but will it Hackintosh?
@Bosco about to ask the same thing... not dumb :D
Not easily. Video chipset isn't supported right now.
Johanna, please stop using "we" and "our" so much. I want to know what you thought. If there is a point where multiple people contributed, that's fine, but please refrain from using those words if the review is entirely yours. Thank you.
@Jeff
It's a standard editorial trick -- all the Engadget articles speak in the "we" and "us" voice. Like it or not, it's intended to give a sense of unity to the articles so that you identify the writer as "the Engadget team" instead of as Joanna Stern, Joshua Topolsky, etc. It's actually pretty effective.
@Cameron
It is effective, but I still know who wrote the article therefore it contradicts itself. If the review said "By The Engadget Team" I wouldn't have a problem with it.
@Jeff Be kind! Johanna and Josh Topolsky are actually schizophrenics; the "we"s and "us"s simply mean that each of their personalities agree, especially when Apple launches a new "Precious... We loves the Precious!" ;-D
@Palomino
Touche.
@Jeff This quote makes it so much worse.
"when we used it while lying in bed."
You had people review this with you in your bed??
@lazylazyjoe I must admit writing that line is always a bit odd. But yes, all of the Engadget staff gets in bed and tests the laptop. We're close like that.
@Joanna Stern
I think you could have written that quote another way without being constrained by the we/our rule. In fact, I don't think you needed to even mention that you were in bed.
Another fact, you used we/our five times in four sentences (the paragraph containing the "in bed" quote). I think we have established that the review is a collection of things that "we" noticed, I don't think you need to be stating that over and over.
@Joanna Stern
It wonder if it could have been done "When one of reviewers was in bed..." or "it will warm your lap while in bed" These still aren't first person plural, though. Either way, it's a constricting format that I think you did a good job with, bed joke withstanding. Good review. Thanks,
Please be a good "editor" and try to refrain from using language such as "We're close like that." More specifically, the "like that" part. Why must so many people use "like that" after everything these days? "We roll like that." "I'm good like that." "We're close like that." It comes off as "ghetto." Did you grow up in the ghetto? Didn't think so. I digress.
@Jeff Stop already, or I'll start picking on your writing. Example: "I don't think you need to be stating that over and over." You don't need to use "TO BE" in a sentence like the one above (your sentence). Also, using a word like "repeatedly" instead of the phrase "over and over" would be nice, too; I don't like reading "over" repeatedly in a sentence. :-p
The Broadcom HD accelerator has open-source drivers and works fine under MPC-HC, KMPlayer, GOM and XBMC.
99% of people who download MKVs would be using one of these players, not some WMP or Quicktime (!) crap.
Most people I know use VLC. Does it work with that?
@One Love Just tried the Ion Man clip in VLC...playback is worse in VLC than in QuickTime.
@Joanna Stern : Thanks for trying it.
I think the whole idea of needing additional hardware for HD content (in a netbook) is silly. Especially when it costs an extra $30. Netbook graphics should at least handle 720p (smoothly) in 2010. Just my take.
@One Love
GMA950s can handle 720P fine...
@One Love They did. Remember the n280??
@
Of course, the term 'HD playback' is very loose. It is all about the complexity of the video stream.
For example, MPEG-4 ASP (Xvid/Divx) is very undemanding, and just about any computer from the past 10 years can manage it at 720p or higher. H.264 Baseline is not too demanding either, thats why the ZuneHD can do it at 720p. H.264 High-profile (as used by pretty much every downloaded MKV) on the other hand, is very demanding. And of course, on top of resolution you have to factor in bitrate (avg and max), settings (such as ref-frames) etc.
Thats why in theory the average Atom+GMA netbook CANT handle HD video. Until you can handle absolutely everything thrown at you, all codecs, all profiles, all levels, (within reason) all the way up to 1080p with Bluray bitrates, you are stuck in a situation where some stuff plays, and some stuff doesnt. So you cant claim HD playback.
Thats where the Broadcom HD comes in. It genuinely does have enough power to handle all this stuff. This reviewer just doesnt know enough about video to review it properly.
So let me get this straight. No HDMI, only supports WMP (no Blu-Ray support to boot), and lower performance than other Pine Tail netbooks.
What's the point of holding out (paying more) for Broadcom equipped netbooks? 720p video that I downloaded? I'll pass.
Oh, and it's ugly.
@bittoman
That's what's written in the review, pretty much. Joanna does I nice job picking out all the weaknesses without coming across as biased or unfair.
Ugliness is in the eye of the beholder.
@bittoman
Funny thing is, my year old Mini 10 (the original one) with Intel GMA500 and coreAVC installed handles 720p MKV perfectly and has an HDMI out.
@bittoman On the other hand, the $330 HP Mini 210 HD Edition can handle 1080p.
@hmmwv
or the HP mini 311, which to date is still the best solution IMO. Told my boss to get one for his 12 year old daughter. Plays flash games fine, plays videos excellent. Plus Ion > Broadcom HD, and honestly, I think the 311 looks way sharper than the Dell.
How far back can you open the screen? I've found the Mini 10v didn't let you tilt the screen back far enough if you were standing at a kitchen counter.
Also does the trackpad still not play nice when trying to use 2 hands, i.e. one finger moving the cursor and another hovering over the button? Every time I go to use the 10v it drives me nuts.
Decent review but with that thickness I can't say there's much appeal for a netbook like this. And the Broadcom accelerator sounds like a pretty poor substitute for ION.
@tux2005 Screen only tilts to about a 145 degree angle, see pictures in the the gallery. This touchpad is better with two fingers, but it isn't big enough for two fingers which is part of the reason it sucks. Uou should disable the multitouch in the mouse settings on your Mini 10V.
Yawn, I'd rather have Ion w/ less battery life.... y would anyone want to spend so much on a piece of slow crap anyway?
@Joanna Stern : Are you going to do a review on the 1001P and maybe compare it with the 1005PE? (I seen the 1005PE review). Thanks.
No HDMI out? That makes a loser for me. Why waste extra cash to support "HD" if your only option is that tiny screen. I won't buy a netbook that doesn't give me the option to take it to a friend's house and play video on their TV.
It would be nice to have a netbook that could output video to a TV via HDMI, and have the grunt to play back 1080p. Clearly Intel decided that wasn't going to happen.
@One Love
I don't think the VLC devs have any plan to support it. An admin post on the VLC forum said something like they wanted money to add support.
@voodoo : That's fine. I'd rather just depend on my GPU anyway.
Using wmp 11/12 it seems as if only mp4 video gets accelerated (at least on the bcm70012 in my acer d250)
installing either the hp variant of arcsoft's total media theater, MPC-HT, or xmbc allowed use for almost all video i threw at it.
also managed blu-ray running anydvd hd, the above mentioned apps, and selecting the actual video file with the movie. some played fine, others stuttered when the bitrate jumped.
now, is this using the bcm70012 or bcm70015? is it on board or a mini pci-e card?
Its a shame this turned out to be a bit of a dissappointment...
Great work with the review though Joanna! I can't wait to check out your broadcom HD review of the HP Mini 210!
@Shash450
I second that, when are we going to see a review of the HP Mini 210 and the MSI Wind U135?
y your at the price of a ulv notebook now i don't know about you but there is no way im paying 425 for a netbook when i can get a msi x-340 for 500 and o yeah it actually has a 720p display and videos are really smooth
@Joanna Stern
How does it do with HMTL5 video?
Or HD HTML5 video if there is any....
UGLY!!!! man do pc manufactures just try to make ugly machines these days??? so glad i splurged for the nokia booklet. taking this anywhere would make me look like a styleless zombie. geez, make a decently looking laptop for once. (this coming from a long time dell/pc user)
@cplush I agree that Nokia booklet is where design needs to go. But it needed a 768 screen. I hope they will come out with a new version. Listen manufactures - No more 1024x600! Got it?