Clear WiMAX USB modem impressions
Clearwire (along with Sprint and Comcast, just to name a couple) has been fiercely expanding its WiMAX network across America for months on end now, and while select citizens in select cities have had access to the 4G superhighway for just over a year, we haven't actually had the opportunity to find ourselves in one of those locations for any amount of time. Until recently, that is. The Clear 4G service was lit up in Las Vegas late last year, which gave the Engadget squad just enough time to scrounge up a gaggle of Motorola 4G USB sticks and really test out the network while at CES. Meanwhile, the North Carolinians among us were also able to test the boundaries of the 4G patches that have been setup here, and we're finally ready to dish out a few opinions on the fourth generation of cellular data. Eager to know if it's the best thing since sliced bread the invention of the MP3? Read on to find out.
Unlike most 3G options, Clear's WiMAX solution can actually replace your home ISP. We'd probably recommend an at-home modem over a USB stick if you're going that route, but we suppose one could always shove their USB modem in their home desktop before hitting the web for the day. Our focus here is on the mobile side, but suffice it to say, if your home is within a well-covered patch of 4G, there's no reason you shouldn't considering ditching your existing ISP and giving this a shot. Granted, we wouldn't recommend that heavy users (particularly those who spend days on end uploading wacky YouTube HD videos) do such a thing, but for casual browsers the speed is likely to satisfy -- and it'll probably save you a buck or two in the end over what you're paying now.
The actual Motorola USB modem that we used was a 4G-only device, which makes it extremely limited when you're traveling. For example, if using a traditional 3G USB modem whilst in the backseat of a vehicle, it can automatically step down to 2G when you pass out of the city and into a more rural setting. It's typically seamless, and it enables one's internet experience to remain in tact even when jumping from one network to another. Unfortunately, this 4G stick is useless when traveling outside of a 4G coverage area; frankly, we'd recommend one of the 4G / 3G sticks if you're jonesing for something quicker, which will allow you to still surf at 3G speeds if you travel to an area that's outside of the 4G umbrella.
That said, the modem itself performed well in the 4G cities that we surveyed. Installation was a breeze on both Mac and PC platforms, and the bundled USB adapter enabled us to angle it as we pleased and prevented the stick itself from blocking our power ports when inserted. The connection management software was rather barebones, and it simply auto-searches and auto-connects to a network (at least on the Mac side) whenever it detects that a 4G device is present. Once connected, a row of lights informs you of your signal strength. And that's where things begin to get iffy.
More so than any 3G area we've ever been in, 4G connections just seemed overly finicky. We could literally move two feet from our current position and drop the entire signal, yet be downloading at blazing fast rates after we moved back and reconnected. We also found that the fringe areas of the posted 4G blankets are more "fringy" than those in the 3G world; unless you're in the heart of the city that Clearwire covers, you should probably expect spotty or intermittent coverage. As an example, the entire Engadget staff had full coverage (and great throughput speeds) while using 4G at our CES trailer; just a five minute walk away to the hotel brought about varied results.
I personally couldn't connect to Clearwire's network at all from my 18th floor room, while my Sprint 3G card hummed along fine; my good buddy and confidant Chris Ziegler had no issues hopping on the 4G waves from his 18th floor room that sat just a few meters down from mine. It seemed that our hotel luck was all over the place, with some connecting sans issue, some not at all and some with paltry rates and a signal that tended to drop with some level of frequency. We fully understand that CES was going on, but it's not like everyone has shifted to 4G handsets just yet -- in fact, we'd wager that the 4G network in Vegas was the lightest used during the show. We also had varying levels of success in hotel suites where press conferences were being held. Some of the team was able to liveblog entire pressers on 4G without a hiccup, while others just down the road couldn't find a signal at all to connect to (meaning we had to resort to 3G).
When we were able to nail down a solid connection, speeds were admirable. Not mind-blowing, but definitely a step up from the 3G rates that we've grown accustomed to seeing. On average, we were able to pull between 2,000 and 3,000Kbps down, while upload rates rarely topped 600Kbps. That's a fair bit less than those theoretical maximums (around half, actually), but since when has any internet service actually delivered those lofty peaks? We should also note that latency was far better on 4G than on 3G; we rarely saw ping times over 100ms, while our 3G test from a year ago rarely saw ping times under 150ms.
If you'll compare these rates to those found in the aforementioned 3G test, you'll notice that 4G is a lot more like 3.5G, so to speak. It's not going to smoke your HSDPA connection by any wide margin, and it's a lot more likely to drop out on you in our experience. Of course, one must remember than this technology is still in its infancy, and there are still waves upon waves of rollouts that need to happen before the level of infrastructure supporting it comes close to matching that already installed by 3G operators. Still, if you're looking to buy into 4G today, we can't recommend any solution that doesn't also offer 3G compatibility as a backup. In our testing, we found 4G networks to be far too spotty and unreliable to use as your sole mobile broadband solution. Even if your home or place of work is supposedly blanketed according to Clearwire, there's a decent chance that some rooms, corners and hallways won't be. 'Course, we'd be a lot more willing to forgive the shortfalls if WiMAX were available in more than a handful of cities, but hey, expansion takes time and money -- neither of which are particularly easy to come by these days.
Unlike most 3G options, Clear's WiMAX solution can actually replace your home ISP. We'd probably recommend an at-home modem over a USB stick if you're going that route, but we suppose one could always shove their USB modem in their home desktop before hitting the web for the day. Our focus here is on the mobile side, but suffice it to say, if your home is within a well-covered patch of 4G, there's no reason you shouldn't considering ditching your existing ISP and giving this a shot. Granted, we wouldn't recommend that heavy users (particularly those who spend days on end uploading wacky YouTube HD videos) do such a thing, but for casual browsers the speed is likely to satisfy -- and it'll probably save you a buck or two in the end over what you're paying now.

The actual Motorola USB modem that we used was a 4G-only device, which makes it extremely limited when you're traveling. For example, if using a traditional 3G USB modem whilst in the backseat of a vehicle, it can automatically step down to 2G when you pass out of the city and into a more rural setting. It's typically seamless, and it enables one's internet experience to remain in tact even when jumping from one network to another. Unfortunately, this 4G stick is useless when traveling outside of a 4G coverage area; frankly, we'd recommend one of the 4G / 3G sticks if you're jonesing for something quicker, which will allow you to still surf at 3G speeds if you travel to an area that's outside of the 4G umbrella.
That said, the modem itself performed well in the 4G cities that we surveyed. Installation was a breeze on both Mac and PC platforms, and the bundled USB adapter enabled us to angle it as we pleased and prevented the stick itself from blocking our power ports when inserted. The connection management software was rather barebones, and it simply auto-searches and auto-connects to a network (at least on the Mac side) whenever it detects that a 4G device is present. Once connected, a row of lights informs you of your signal strength. And that's where things begin to get iffy.

More so than any 3G area we've ever been in, 4G connections just seemed overly finicky. We could literally move two feet from our current position and drop the entire signal, yet be downloading at blazing fast rates after we moved back and reconnected. We also found that the fringe areas of the posted 4G blankets are more "fringy" than those in the 3G world; unless you're in the heart of the city that Clearwire covers, you should probably expect spotty or intermittent coverage. As an example, the entire Engadget staff had full coverage (and great throughput speeds) while using 4G at our CES trailer; just a five minute walk away to the hotel brought about varied results.
I personally couldn't connect to Clearwire's network at all from my 18th floor room, while my Sprint 3G card hummed along fine; my good buddy and confidant Chris Ziegler had no issues hopping on the 4G waves from his 18th floor room that sat just a few meters down from mine. It seemed that our hotel luck was all over the place, with some connecting sans issue, some not at all and some with paltry rates and a signal that tended to drop with some level of frequency. We fully understand that CES was going on, but it's not like everyone has shifted to 4G handsets just yet -- in fact, we'd wager that the 4G network in Vegas was the lightest used during the show. We also had varying levels of success in hotel suites where press conferences were being held. Some of the team was able to liveblog entire pressers on 4G without a hiccup, while others just down the road couldn't find a signal at all to connect to (meaning we had to resort to 3G).

When we were able to nail down a solid connection, speeds were admirable. Not mind-blowing, but definitely a step up from the 3G rates that we've grown accustomed to seeing. On average, we were able to pull between 2,000 and 3,000Kbps down, while upload rates rarely topped 600Kbps. That's a fair bit less than those theoretical maximums (around half, actually), but since when has any internet service actually delivered those lofty peaks? We should also note that latency was far better on 4G than on 3G; we rarely saw ping times over 100ms, while our 3G test from a year ago rarely saw ping times under 150ms.

If you'll compare these rates to those found in the aforementioned 3G test, you'll notice that 4G is a lot more like 3.5G, so to speak. It's not going to smoke your HSDPA connection by any wide margin, and it's a lot more likely to drop out on you in our experience. Of course, one must remember than this technology is still in its infancy, and there are still waves upon waves of rollouts that need to happen before the level of infrastructure supporting it comes close to matching that already installed by 3G operators. Still, if you're looking to buy into 4G today, we can't recommend any solution that doesn't also offer 3G compatibility as a backup. In our testing, we found 4G networks to be far too spotty and unreliable to use as your sole mobile broadband solution. Even if your home or place of work is supposedly blanketed according to Clearwire, there's a decent chance that some rooms, corners and hallways won't be. 'Course, we'd be a lot more willing to forgive the shortfalls if WiMAX were available in more than a handful of cities, but hey, expansion takes time and money -- neither of which are particularly easy to come by these days.




























Does it work on the iPad? oh never mind...
@Drago
Metropolitan Los Angeles would like a slice of the WiMax pie, too. Millions of people over here; second largest city in the US... just sayin'
@Drago GO ON YAHOO.COM AND CHECK OUT THEIR HEADLINE ABOUT THE IPAD! I'M PRETTY SURE TOPOLSKY IS IN THE HEADLINE'S PICTURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@John Stathakis Yep you're correct that's Josh himself
@Drago
Way to go, Mr. Topolsky. Josh is everywhere. His face is becoming synonymous with geek culture (Mr. Fallon's late-night show, engadget show, etc.).
btw, why was my previous post downranked into oblivion? Did I offend someone? :'-(
@a dumb cat
Maybe it's not there, because of the size of population requires an extensive amount of bandwidth on the backhaul.
@Drago considering that I've used my usb modem with a clearspot (basically a rebranded wipipe from cradlepoint) with my iphone, I don't see why it couldn't be used the same way with Apple's iPad. I've found the clearspot useful for when I want to use apps that have been restricted from working over 3G. Personally I've been debating if I'll get an iPad instead of upgrading my Kindle 2 to a DX. The clearspot works pretty well so I might just get a wifi only one, or get the 3G but only turn it on when traveling out of the area. I get really good 4G reception where I live.
@Drago The $140 thing fits in your pocket, runs for four hours on a lithium-ion battery, connects up to 8 laptops via Wi-Fi, and works like a charm when you're in a decent WiMax coverage area. (You still need to connect a WiMax modem, which costs $50 and requires a data plan.)
More Clear Details: http://bit.ly/wimax-clear-details
And again, why not in the Bay Area!?
-Taylor
@Taylor Yes Taylor Why do you always sign your posts? In case you haven't noticed your name is there already.
@Taylor
I know! I just got a Sprint Overdrive in the hopes that 4G will be hitting SoCal and the SF Bay Area soon(my home area). Would be nice to get 4G both at school and back at home when I'm back for the holidays.
@Drago
Is that why taylor was downranked? I didn't think his post was offensive.
@Taylor Yes Taylor
Why? Because everyone knows that you folks in the SF area are whiny, ungrateful pr*cks.
Now go to your room without supper and 4G.
@Drago
I just sign everything. And it upsets people like you every time. That's why I changed my Engadget name so that I actually repeat my name twice in my own title, even though I sign it at the end. Its funny to see it upset people like you.
But honestly I just sign stuff online, it's just a habit. Somehow, my redundancy offends you people enough that i often get down-ranked.
-Taylor
-Taylor
@Drago Twice...
@Taylor Yes Taylor
You're so desperate to be hardcore, that you feel the need to imagine people are actually offended in your head. Oh how delusional you are. No one is actually offended by it, we just think it's ridiculous, so we downvote it into oblivion so we no longer have to stare at it. Just because someone choses not to look at something, or do something, doesn't mean it offends us. What an odd, black and white life you must lead
@EGOvoruhk
Uh, yeah.
-Taylor
This is all nice and good but it still wont work on a 64bit version of Windows 7. So far everyone is pointing fingers at each other and nothing has improved.
@cibertek, What? I'm using it here in Portland on 64bit Windows 7.
@cibertek I've been using clear in las vegas on windows 7 64-bit for a few months now. what are you talking about??
@cibertek
I am using Clear WiMax USB drivers on my Win7 x64 laptop in Atlanta, GA and it runs great. There have been a few updates in the past few months; have you checked the clear support site for the latest drivers?
@cibertek Absolutely right in most cases. But I learned just a few weeks ago that the 4G/3G card for national use still does not work with W7/64. This is the high-end card that can be used anywhere in the US on either a 4G or 3G network. Clear and Sprint sell the same card. There seems to be two hardware vendors for this type of card and both of them are dragging their feet on an update. If they have released an update in the past 3 weeks, I wasn't aware of it.
I get better speeds than that on my iPhone 3GS in Dallas. Must be on the new 7.2 b/c my download speeds average around 3Mbps and around 250Kbps up.
@swede76 yeah same, i get the better speeds on my g1 (2.6mb/s down and 1.30mb/s up). for me to consider switching to them they need to up there speeds alot and i mean alot since tmobile is rolling out 21mb/s speeds by the end of the year which will probably mean i'll get download speeds of 5mb/s or so.
@swede76
These speeds are SLOW for Clear in my opinion. I have the service (no-contract) here in Philadelphia and it is very good. Average speeds for me are between 3.5Mbps-6.5Mbps. I am currently in a basement at Drexel University, and have only 1 Green bar out of 10 and just received a Speakeasy speedtest result of 1195kbps / 413kbps.
My guess is: as they build out and expand it will improve in other cities. As for Philly, I've VERY satisfied by the coverage and speeds I get.
@swede76 Yeah, same speeds here, ocassionally touching up to 3.1mpbs. I told my g/f to get the Clear 4G and it works great at her place- 5-9mpbs consistently, enough for Xbox Live. But at the Shops at Legacy, it can't find any signal, despite the map showing full coverage.
@Drago LMAO!
Weren't any of you around when 3G was being rolled out? If so, then how about a comparison between then and now?
ill just wait and get the supersonic
I don't know if Clear has a better network here in Atlanta, or if the network in Vegas was just overly taxed during CES but I've been extremely pleased with my Clear USB modem (the home unit is a different matter...very, very directionally oriented).
I can regularly pull down 8+Mb with ~1Mb up.
I just wish I could get it to work with Linux. A linux driver is available but not for this particular modem chipset.
@superpatty
I also have the at home version, but I hooked mine up to a wireless router. Would a router help with your linux issue?
The modem is VERYY sensitive with direction. I am about a block away from the tower in Philly and I keep my modem in the window at all times. I pull speeds around 4MBps with the $30/mo plan.
Tested from Chicago.
http://i45.tinypic.com/2n1t72h.png
@neopc007
Nice, I live in the Chicago suburbs and have often thought about switching to clear's home service. Those speeds are very reassuring.
Whereabouts, neopc007? At the northern end of Andersonville, my experiences are far worse:
http://www.speedtest.net/result/645788103.png
Compare to my lowest-tier RCN service:
http://www.speedtest.net/result/645807257.png
Also, the article doesn't mention that the 4G/3G USB modem is incompatible with the Mac. I had to drop another $170 for the wifi router.
Sorry -- I should have mentioned that I got the 4G+, which the Clear rep said was Mac-compatible. Two months later, drivers are still "coming soon."
I heard that Clear is planning on expanding its operations into the California markets this year, just not sure when yet. Here are the markets that it is live in...http://www.clearwirelessinternet.com/clear-coverage.html
an iPhone that downloads quicker than CLEAR WiMAX...surely you jest...i just got back from Dallas...same lame ATT coverage as ALWAYS...same slow iPhone 3GS. as for CLEAR...it RULES here in Austin...i have the home unit, mobile unit and the SPOT....so i can bypass ATT so as not to see the wheel go round and round. and it runs just fine on Windows 7 32/64 bit...u just download the driver from their website, yo.
Wonder when this will hit Huntsville? I mean, we're one of the leading tech cities in America but due to the whole "Alabama" thing we always end up at the bottom of the mobile tech list.
What software is that you are using for the test, the one that is shown the screen shot?
Looks cool.
@edwardsilver
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest?flash=1
That sounds pretty good to me. Granted I've seen similar bandwidth on my iPhone but no where near that ping. In fact, that is close to 50x's faster than the ping I've seen on my test runs. If that's the only increase it will make wireless much more usable.
I wonder if this explains why their are holes in Clear's coverage maps. If you zoom in on a map, there will often be small areas with no coverage surrounded by areas with coverage.
Also, several of us have attempted to enter our Chicago area addresses into their website, and the site replied that there was no service offered at the location. However, if you enter an address a block away, the service is available.
Is it really that spotty?
But Clearwire is being sued currently, class action I believe for poor service
Using Clear in Honolulu. Yes it is "touchy" and definitely unusable in a moving car. On average while stationary getting 3M down and 1M up. During low traffic times(late night) I've seen 6M down consistently. Also, not good for gamers, ping is 150+ all the time.
Has anyone read Clear's Acceptable Use Policy? This segment stands out as a major concern to me:
"Examples of uses that are not permitted include the continuous unattended streaming, downloading or uploading of videos or other files, maintaining an unattended or continuous uninterrupted connection to the Internet such as through a web camera or machine to machine connections that do not involve active participation by a person, or operating an Internet hosting service such as web hosting or gaming hosting."
I really hope they don't expect people to refrain from "downloading or uploading videos or other files"
@DrTrent I'm clearly in violation. Unlimited never really means what you think it means does it?
Haha, is this 4G? You must be shrooming. LTE should be at least 50 Mbit.
@unyari
You do know Verizon's specified speeds for LTE are 5-12Mb/sec right?
https://www.lte.vzw.com/AboutLTE/VerizonWirelessLTENetwork/tabid/6003/Default.aspx
@COCOViper I weep for america.
These speeds sound like a joke if you're talking about "4G". Here's the result from my prepaid 3G SIM in *China*, and this was measured in my hotel room with just a bar of reception. http://www.speedtest.net/result/679734720.png
Why haven't I seen any WiMAX results that are as fast as HSDPA yet? At least the LTE networks in scandinavia have speeds that start out at the high-end HSDPA speeds even if they're not much faster.